To: Arkinsaw
I said a few days ago that the Supreme Court would simply not get involved.If they were going to not get involved, they would have not rendered a decision - they would have left the Appeals Court ruling stand.
They pro-actively made this decision.
52 posted on
10/17/2008 9:00:54 AM PDT by
TexasNative2000
(Be bold. Be brave. You're an American.)
To: TexasNative2000
If they were going to not get involved, they would have not rendered a decision - they would have left the Appeals Court ruling stand.
They pro-actively made this decision.
Ok. Either way its pretty much the same. I believe they have made a pro-active decision to send a message that they are staying away from involvement in policing the political process due to getting raked over the coals in Bush/Gore.
The Supreme Court is going to hunker down and stay out of it so don't count on them for anything this cycle.
80 posted on
10/17/2008 9:06:53 AM PDT by
Arkinsaw
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson