Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Arkinsaw
I said a few days ago that the Supreme Court would simply not get involved.

If they were going to not get involved, they would have not rendered a decision - they would have left the Appeals Court ruling stand.

They pro-actively made this decision.

52 posted on 10/17/2008 9:00:54 AM PDT by TexasNative2000 (Be bold. Be brave. You're an American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: TexasNative2000
If they were going to not get involved, they would have not rendered a decision - they would have left the Appeals Court ruling stand.

They pro-actively made this decision.


Ok. Either way its pretty much the same. I believe they have made a pro-active decision to send a message that they are staying away from involvement in policing the political process due to getting raked over the coals in Bush/Gore.

The Supreme Court is going to hunker down and stay out of it so don't count on them for anything this cycle.
80 posted on 10/17/2008 9:06:53 AM PDT by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson