Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'SNL' Palin 'Incest' Skit Angers Viewers - Viewers, Bloggers Think Skit Went Over Line
WNBC ^

Posted on 09/22/2008 9:56:46 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

'SNL' Palin 'Incest' Skit Angers Viewers Viewers, Bloggers Think Skit Went Over Line

POSTED: 11:30 am EDT September 22, 2008 UPDATED: 12:14 pm EDT September 22, 2008 For the second week in a row, NBC's "Saturday Night Live" has taken to lampooning Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin -- but this time, it has angered conservative viewers over a skit that suggests that the Alaska governor's husband, Todd Palin, was having sex with the couple's daughters.

In the skit, show guest host James Franco plays an assignment editor at the New York Times at the head of an editorial meeting. During a mock assignment meeting where the paper announced that 50 reporters were being sent to look for dirt on Sarah Palin, a Times "reporter" asks, "What about the husband? You know he's doing those daughters. I mean, come on. It's Alaska."

In response, Franco's character said, "He very well could be. Admittedly, there is no evidence of that, but on the other hand, there is no convincing evidence to the contrary. And these are just some of the lingering questions about Gov. Palin."

(Excerpt) Read more at wnbc.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Alabama; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: alfranken; comedy; culturewar; democrats; elections; hystericalmedia; jamesfranco; liberalmedia; mccainpalin; nbc; nytimes; palin; palinattacks; pds; propagandawingofdnc; satire; smearcampaign; snl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300301-314 next last
To: Checkers

Saw the skit and thought it was nothing but homosexual cliches and vicious attacks against Palin’s husband. There is no reason for us to laugh at incest. The Polar bear jokes were beyond stupid.

Some of us would like to laugh at a joke every decade or so which is why we don’t watch that pablum show. That shark jumped before Happy Days.

Pray for W, Palin and Our Freedom Fighters


261 posted on 09/22/2008 8:42:35 PM PDT by bray (Drill Congress!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: Checkers

Persistent you are, but I think you miss the point. Jokes about incest, regardless of who is the butt of the joke, simply aren’t funny. It is a debased mind that finds humor in that topic.


262 posted on 09/22/2008 8:43:12 PM PDT by comps4spice (Obama supporters are fascist thugs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: Checkers
“Where I come from, you don’t make jokes about a man’s family and say the father is committing incest with his daughter.”

Here ya go:

I have seen the video. The suggestion that Todd Palin is committing incest with his daughters is reprehensible. It is irrelevant to me that a bigoted reporter is making the accusation.

In your glee that SNL is mocking the NYT, you are quite willing to overlook this despicable act of impugning Todd Palin's honor. But I can find no humor here. I am rather sad that this passes for humor today because it ruins what might have been a good piece of satire.

263 posted on 09/22/2008 8:47:16 PM PDT by stripes1776 ("That if gold rust, what shall iron do?" --Chaucer .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: comps4spice

“Jokes about incest, regardless of who is the butt of the joke, simply aren’t funny.”

There was no “jokes about incest”. There was satire about the attitudes of the New York Times staff.

Sorry you missed it.


264 posted on 09/22/2008 8:53:53 PM PDT by Checkers (Voting for McCain? Then don't complain. (Hey, that rhymes.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: stripes1776

Did you watch the WHOLE eight minutes of the skit?


265 posted on 09/22/2008 8:55:08 PM PDT by Checkers (Voting for McCain? Then don't complain. (Hey, that rhymes.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

Check out post 263.

These people are, respectfully, idiots.


266 posted on 09/22/2008 8:57:28 PM PDT by Checkers (Voting for McCain? Then don't complain. (Hey, that rhymes.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: bray
Of course there was no jokes about BJ and Chelsea as there shouldn’t be. That is the point.

Oh, I see what you were saying now. SNL wasn't making jokes like that because Clinton was a Democrat. Yes, I agree.

Pray for W, McCuda and Our Troops

Yes, as long as I have breath. Thank you for doing the same.

267 posted on 09/22/2008 8:58:46 PM PDT by stripes1776 ("That if gold rust, what shall iron do?" --Chaucer .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]

To: Checkers

So are you telling me that there was no mention of incest among the Palin family? Is that what you are saying?


268 posted on 09/22/2008 9:00:08 PM PDT by comps4spice (Obama supporters are fascist thugs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: Checkers

I’m guessing you are a Paulista, right?


269 posted on 09/22/2008 9:01:45 PM PDT by comps4spice (Obama supporters are fascist thugs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: Checkers
Did you watch the WHOLE eight minutes of the skit?

I have seen the whole skit, from beginning to end, from the start to the finish, from a to z, from alpha to omega, from top to bottom, completely, wholly, entirely, integrally, the whole enchilada.

It could have been a good piece of biting satire if they had left out the incest part. That was uncalled for.

270 posted on 09/22/2008 9:06:45 PM PDT by stripes1776 ("That if gold rust, what shall iron do?" --Chaucer .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

It occurs to me that when the new “Moose Hunting” Palin song was posted the other day on FR as performed by Pat Garrett, anti Palin types on the source site were writing posts that implied Garrett has a criminal record involving children. I could find nothing online saying any such thing, so figure this must be a new, sick Dem strategy, the pedophile/incest insinuation. Wouldn’t surprise me.


271 posted on 09/22/2008 9:18:08 PM PDT by Mjaye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Checkers

Web search engines are wonderful things, Checkers.

Here you go: Palin AND VILF

Now please just figure it out for yourself. I’m not inclined to repeat that hideous acronym any more.


272 posted on 09/22/2008 10:29:33 PM PDT by unspun (Tell the truth about Obama to all you know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: Checkers

Web search engines are wonderful things, Checkers.

Here you go: Palin AND VPILF

Now please just figure it out for yourself. I’m not inclined to repeat that hideous acronym any more.

(And don’t bother me.)


273 posted on 09/22/2008 10:30:06 PM PDT by unspun (Tell the truth about Obama to all you know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: unspun

“Web search engines are wonderful things, Checkers.

Here you go: Palin AND VPILF

Now please just figure it out for yourself. I’m not inclined to repeat that hideous acronym any more.

(And don’t bother me.)”

What’s the connection between your post and the SNL skit, again?


274 posted on 09/22/2008 10:32:31 PM PDT by Checkers (Voting for McCain? Then don't complain. (Hey, that rhymes.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]

To: Mjaye

Did you see the skit?

If you have not, here it is: http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=179063


275 posted on 09/22/2008 10:34:23 PM PDT by Checkers (Voting for McCain? Then don't complain. (Hey, that rhymes.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: comps4spice

“I’m guessing you are a Paulista, right?”

Why is that?


276 posted on 09/22/2008 10:35:35 PM PDT by Checkers (Voting for McCain? Then don't complain. (Hey, that rhymes.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: Checkers

Why didn’t you answer the question?


277 posted on 09/23/2008 12:07:03 AM PDT by Ajnin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

To: Checkers; comps4spice
So are you telling me that there was no mention of incest among the Palin family? Is that what you are saying?

Answer this question please.

278 posted on 09/23/2008 12:09:10 AM PDT by Ajnin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

To: Burr5
I have seen it for myself, I stand by my comments. The Palin family was smeared. The liberals at SNL wrapped the smear in a "we were talking about the media" blanket. They did not have to state Todd was having sex with his own daughters in the skit to show NYT media bias.

Give the libs a pass if you will. To me they are guilty until proven innocent.

279 posted on 09/23/2008 1:13:42 AM PDT by Ajnin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: Mjaye
...... anti Palin types on the source site were writing posts that implied Garrett has a criminal record involving children. I could find nothing online saying any such thing, so figure this must be a new, sick Dem strategy, the pedophile/incest insinuation. Wouldn’t surprise me.

You may be on to something....Sinking Deeper: Randi Rhodes Suggests Palin Likes to Sleep with Teenage Boys
280 posted on 09/23/2008 4:19:12 AM PDT by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300301-314 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson