Posted on 09/22/2008 9:56:46 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
'SNL' Palin 'Incest' Skit Angers Viewers Viewers, Bloggers Think Skit Went Over Line
POSTED: 11:30 am EDT September 22, 2008 UPDATED: 12:14 pm EDT September 22, 2008 For the second week in a row, NBC's "Saturday Night Live" has taken to lampooning Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin -- but this time, it has angered conservative viewers over a skit that suggests that the Alaska governor's husband, Todd Palin, was having sex with the couple's daughters.
In the skit, show guest host James Franco plays an assignment editor at the New York Times at the head of an editorial meeting. During a mock assignment meeting where the paper announced that 50 reporters were being sent to look for dirt on Sarah Palin, a Times "reporter" asks, "What about the husband? You know he's doing those daughters. I mean, come on. It's Alaska."
In response, Franco's character said, "He very well could be. Admittedly, there is no evidence of that, but on the other hand, there is no convincing evidence to the contrary. And these are just some of the lingering questions about Gov. Palin."
(Excerpt) Read more at wnbc.com ...
Saw the skit and thought it was nothing but homosexual cliches and vicious attacks against Palin’s husband. There is no reason for us to laugh at incest. The Polar bear jokes were beyond stupid.
Some of us would like to laugh at a joke every decade or so which is why we don’t watch that pablum show. That shark jumped before Happy Days.
Pray for W, Palin and Our Freedom Fighters
Persistent you are, but I think you miss the point. Jokes about incest, regardless of who is the butt of the joke, simply aren’t funny. It is a debased mind that finds humor in that topic.
Here ya go:
I have seen the video. The suggestion that Todd Palin is committing incest with his daughters is reprehensible. It is irrelevant to me that a bigoted reporter is making the accusation.
In your glee that SNL is mocking the NYT, you are quite willing to overlook this despicable act of impugning Todd Palin's honor. But I can find no humor here. I am rather sad that this passes for humor today because it ruins what might have been a good piece of satire.
“Jokes about incest, regardless of who is the butt of the joke, simply arent funny.”
There was no “jokes about incest”. There was satire about the attitudes of the New York Times staff.
Sorry you missed it.
Did you watch the WHOLE eight minutes of the skit?
Check out post 263.
These people are, respectfully, idiots.
Oh, I see what you were saying now. SNL wasn't making jokes like that because Clinton was a Democrat. Yes, I agree.
Pray for W, McCuda and Our Troops
Yes, as long as I have breath. Thank you for doing the same.
So are you telling me that there was no mention of incest among the Palin family? Is that what you are saying?
I’m guessing you are a Paulista, right?
I have seen the whole skit, from beginning to end, from the start to the finish, from a to z, from alpha to omega, from top to bottom, completely, wholly, entirely, integrally, the whole enchilada.
It could have been a good piece of biting satire if they had left out the incest part. That was uncalled for.
It occurs to me that when the new “Moose Hunting” Palin song was posted the other day on FR as performed by Pat Garrett, anti Palin types on the source site were writing posts that implied Garrett has a criminal record involving children. I could find nothing online saying any such thing, so figure this must be a new, sick Dem strategy, the pedophile/incest insinuation. Wouldn’t surprise me.
Web search engines are wonderful things, Checkers.
Here you go: Palin AND VILF
Now please just figure it out for yourself. I’m not inclined to repeat that hideous acronym any more.
Web search engines are wonderful things, Checkers.
Here you go: Palin AND VPILF
Now please just figure it out for yourself. I’m not inclined to repeat that hideous acronym any more.
(And don’t bother me.)
“Web search engines are wonderful things, Checkers.
Here you go: Palin AND VPILF
Now please just figure it out for yourself. Im not inclined to repeat that hideous acronym any more.
(And dont bother me.)”
What’s the connection between your post and the SNL skit, again?
“Im guessing you are a Paulista, right?”
Why is that?
Why didn’t you answer the question?
Answer this question please.
Give the libs a pass if you will. To me they are guilty until proven innocent.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.