Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Barack Obama is by far the most radical candidate we have ever had for president. He would even put political correctness and social engineering schemes ahead of military readiness and national defense...and so would the rest of his party.
1 posted on 08/13/2008 7:26:33 AM PDT by Apollos21K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Apollos21K

Forward ... mince!


2 posted on 08/13/2008 7:27:41 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (College kid: "Do you have a minute for Obama?" NVA: "Not now or ever.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Apollos21K
Barack Obama is by far the most radical candidate we have ever had for president.

Obama is a radical and we don't yet know how radical. However, we have had many radicals run for president in the past, some perhaps more radical.

3 posted on 08/13/2008 7:28:15 AM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Apollos21K

Gonna have to build more barracks. Gonna need new ones for the mos and lezzies, cuz they have no sexual interest in each other, and can be housed in the same building.


4 posted on 08/13/2008 7:29:49 AM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ("Don't touch that thing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Apollos21K

B. Hussien Obamanation will change the MILITARY UNIFORMS, too. Instead of camo uniforms, B H O will have them in pink and other bright colors!1


5 posted on 08/13/2008 7:36:03 AM PDT by MaineConservative (Charlie Summers -- an Iraqi Vet and businessman for Maine's CD-1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Apollos21K

He’d also end up reinstating the draft. There’s no way otherwise to realize his program of a domestic security force larger than the military without unwilling conscripts. But in the new millennium, he would also have to include women among the draftees as any program that compelled only men would quickly fall as discriminatory. I wonder how poplar he would be among the college crowd if they realized their fates at the hands of their savior.


7 posted on 08/13/2008 7:36:57 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Apollos21K

Having homosexualists in the military will give whole new meaning to ranks like “Rear Admiral”, “Lance Corporal”, “Chief Petty Officer”, “Able Seaman”, “Gunner’s Mate”, and of course “Private”.


8 posted on 08/13/2008 7:40:02 AM PDT by DieHard the Hunter (Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fàg am bealach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Apollos21K

I fear for my country...

...and MY Marine Corps.


9 posted on 08/13/2008 7:40:50 AM PDT by Ben Reyes (CWO-4, USMC, Retired...And you, Private.... I said 'march!', not 'pirouette')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Apollos21K

11 posted on 08/13/2008 7:41:55 AM PDT by davidlachnicht ("IF WE'RE ALL TO BE TARGETS, THEN WE ALL MUST BE SOLDIERS.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Apollos21K
Start the Music

Break out the glowsticks, it's a feel good rave!

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

12 posted on 08/13/2008 7:42:27 AM PDT by Sax (this idea was not a practical deterrent, for reasons which, at this moment, must be all too obvious)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Apollos21K
This is one subject where I break with many Freepers...

I support all of our troops.
I support anyone willing to pick up a gun
and go get them before they come here to get us.



16 posted on 08/13/2008 7:52:36 AM PDT by davidlachnicht ("IF WE'RE ALL TO BE TARGETS, THEN WE ALL MUST BE SOLDIERS.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Apollos21K

I really don’t care if they are gay or not, as long as they can handle a gun.

For that matter, I’d rather have a big butch female rather than a paint my nails kind of girl.


22 posted on 08/13/2008 8:10:02 AM PDT by autumnraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Apollos21K

Draft all homosexuals into the military and bar the heterosexuals. That way the homosexuals can screw the enemy to victory instead of shooting them.


23 posted on 08/13/2008 8:21:35 AM PDT by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Apollos21K

....and so do I......and openly...enough with the BS DADT policy.

Just keep ‘em outta the combat arms, for now, like they do with women.


24 posted on 08/13/2008 8:36:53 AM PDT by ElectricStrawberry (1/27th Infantry Wolfhounds...cut in half during the Clinton years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Apollos21K

There are already homosexuals in the military. What they are calling for is for out-in-the-open homosexuality.


29 posted on 08/13/2008 8:48:03 AM PDT by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Apollos21K

When I joined, homosexuality was forbidden.
Then it was tolerated.
I’m glad I retired before it was required.


34 posted on 08/13/2008 9:57:16 AM PDT by kas2591 (Life's harder when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Apollos21K

America, home of the stupid; America, home of the idiots with hands stuck out for free stuff. REAL AMERICANS had better wake up to the utter destruction of this Republic, our moral values, our way of life, our faith in God, and get off their dead asses and move to destroy this bunch in November. But, no, however, America the stupid wants to blame everything on Bush, the republicans (both of whom deserve loads of blame), however the alternative is absolutely unforgivable and destructive. We have to defeat these radical leftists. They must not only be defeated, they must be destroyed once and for all. Fags in my military is NOT going to work. Open gays will find their lives in jeopardy, because the majority of men are not going to share quarters or fox holes with fagots. This has to be stopped. AMERICAN, YOU HAVE LITTLE TIME LEFT. YOU NEED TO WAKE UP AND DEFEAT THESE RADICALS. THEY OPENLY LOVE THAT THE RED CHINANESE ARE DOING WELL IN THE OLYMPICS AND THAT THE SOVIET UNION IS ONCE AGAIN ON THE MARCH. The war between the Soviets and Georgia is nothing more than MCCAIN’S MOVES TO CREATE a war to get votes. They blame it on Bush and on McCain. Wake up people before it is too late.


35 posted on 08/13/2008 10:41:25 AM PDT by RetiredArmy (Obama is the biggest threat too your freedom, liberties and pocket book since FDR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Apollos21K

Top general: Remarks on gays were ‘personal moral views’

http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/03/13/gays.military/index.html

POSTED: 2:36 a.m. EDT, March 14, 2007 WASHINGTON (CNN) — The top U.S. military officer, Gen. Peter Pace, said Tuesday he should have focused more on military policy and less on his own opinion when he told a newspaper homosexual acts are immoral.

His remarks drew opposition from some lawmakers and an advocacy group.

Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told the Chicago Tribune on Monday that he supports the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy banning openly gay people from serving in the U.S. armed forces.

“In expressing my support for the current policy, I also offered some personal opinions about moral conduct,” Pace said in a statement. “I should have focused more on my support of the policy and less on my personal moral views.” (Watch viewers weigh in on Pace’s comments )

Earlier Tuesday, senior staff members for Pace said the general had no plans to apologize for his comments, which included comparisons between homosexuality and adultery — behavior that he said is prosecuted in the military.

“My upbringing is such that I believe that there are certain things, certain types of conduct that are immoral,” Pace told the Tribune. “I believe that military members who sleep with other military members’ wives are immoral in their conduct.”

Pace also told the paper, “I believe that homosexual acts between individuals are immoral, and that we should not condone immoral acts.

“So the ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ [policy] allows an individual to serve the country ... if we know about immoral acts, regardless of committed by who, then we have a responsibility.

“I do not believe that the armed forces are well served by saying through our policies that it’s OK to be immoral in any way, not just with regards to homosexual acts,” the Joint Chiefs chairman said.

“So from that standpoint, saying that gays should serve openly in the military to me says that we, by policy, would be condoning what I believe is immoral activity,” he added.


37 posted on 08/13/2008 10:50:50 AM PDT by victim soul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson