Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pete Stark on Gay Marriage Decision: 'I wonder what they're going to do with the Mormons.
Campaign Spot ^ | 05/16/2008 | Jim Gerahgty

Posted on 05/16/2008 1:04:28 PM PDT by JRochelle

Newly-announced Obama endorser and superdelegate, Rep. Pete Stark, talking about the California gay marriage decision on XM's POTUS08 earlier today:

Rebecca Roberts, XM: Congressman Pete Stark of California, a new super-delegate for Barack Obama. I wanted to get your reaction, by the way, since you're a Californian, on the Supreme Court decision to overturn the ban on gay marriage.

Stark: I think that was, you know... California usually leads on these issues of human rights and civil rights. I was quite proud of our state supreme court. We're going to have a big fight, because you know, the born-again Christians and their right wing loonies are going to put this thing on the ballot, which you can do easily in California through petitions. So it's going to be a tough fight. It'll be nasty. I find the homophobes become very unpleasant people and we're going to have to work hard to protect human rights in California. I hope we can do it. It would be a sad day for California to start to trash people's constitutional rights.

Somebody said earlier this morning that I — my colleagues, I don't — put their hands on the Bible to support the Constitution, but I've never seen them putting their hands on the Constitution to support the Bible... [Roberts says that's a pretty good line, and Stark returns to the topic.]

And I just think (muffled) we're dealing with people who want to have a responsible realtionship between two-

I wonder what they're going to do with the Mormons. I'd like to put polygamy up if they want to fight this battle. Let's go into Utah and have it out. I mean, I don't have any quarrel with polygamy, as long as they leave little kids alone, which is child abuse.

But if you want to have three husbands, be my guest. I think that to me, that's your decision.

I think it's kind of humorous you're going to find the Mormons leading the fight against gay marriage, which is an interesting commentary on what you believe.

(I would note that Rebecca Roberts of XM is way too classy to bring up Mormons or polygamy in this context; Stark brings up the false stereotype about Mormons on his own.)

Audio here.

So... I wonder how Senator Obama feels about Stark's characterization of the Mormon faith.

UPDATE: Campaign Spot reader Kevin notes, "He may want to check his Funk and Wagnalls, polygamy is having more than one wife, polyandry is having more than one husband."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; US: California
KEYWORDS: 110th; gayagenda; homosexualagenda; mormon; mormons; nagpra; petestark; samesexmarriage; stark
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last
Well Mr Stark, if you think we want gay marriage or polygamy, well think again!

P.S I had to adjust the title, too long.

1 posted on 05/16/2008 1:04:28 PM PDT by JRochelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Flame incoming.

I’m pretty sure most Mormons want polygamy or gay marriage either.

This congressman is a dolt.


2 posted on 05/16/2008 1:06:07 PM PDT by JRochelle (Keep sweet means shut up and take it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle

A guy with multiple guys would be ok.


3 posted on 05/16/2008 1:06:09 PM PDT by ex-snook ("Above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle

Fortney is one of those buffoons who believes that a bunch of black-robed idiots should ALWAYS trump the will of “We the People” in this country. Good Night America!


4 posted on 05/16/2008 1:12:53 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (De-Globalize yourself !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle

I don’t mind if THEY want polygamy, but I have to wonder WHY anybody would WANT more than one spouse!?!?!..........Multiple mothers-in-law is a punishment worse than death!............


5 posted on 05/16/2008 1:15:06 PM PDT by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle
Using Stark's logic, we're trampling on the constitutional rights of killers by putting them in prison.  And before someone notes that the constitution allows the government to create laws, and laws against murder are among them... You need to solve the paradox that Californians 'voted' to outlaw gay marriage and yet the supreme court of CA claimed that law to be unconstitutional.
6 posted on 05/16/2008 1:15:48 PM PDT by HawaiianGecko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HawaiianGecko

Mr Stark is proof that this is a great country. Anybody can get into government no matter how mentally challenged they might be.


7 posted on 05/16/2008 1:19:34 PM PDT by HusbandMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: HusbandMan

All he did was prove the argument that redefining marriage to fit gay marriage is a slippery slope to redefining it for polygamy, beastiality, pedophilia, etc. Stark’s kind used to scream, “slippery slope argument, slippery slope argument,” but he just proved by his words that it was a valid argument. Next up, beastiality, then we’ll start hearing the whining of “who are we to say what the age of consent is, it’s arbitrary anyway.”


8 posted on 05/16/2008 1:27:50 PM PDT by messierhunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle

Congress has become a worthless bunch of turds. The lot of them.


9 posted on 05/16/2008 1:31:51 PM PDT by combat_boots (She lives! 22 weeks, 9.5 inches. Go, baby, go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle
He is right that the Mormons will be leading the charge against gay marriage. He is wrong, however, about Mormons and polygamy. He knows very well that the Mormons don't practice polygamy, but he wants to smear them with the lie. He is a lying leftist, so what is new?
10 posted on 05/16/2008 1:39:42 PM PDT by HwyChile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

Agreed. I have never been so depressed about the future...seems like judge-made law is the way we are headed.

The voters just don’t count for much anymore.


11 posted on 05/16/2008 1:41:45 PM PDT by kjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: messierhunter
All he did was prove the argument that redefining marriage to fit gay marriage is a slippery slope to redefining it for polygamy, beastiality, pedophilia, etc.

Yep. Once gay "marriage" is the law of the land, the rest of the boundaries will come crashing down like dominoes. Why should a few thousand years of hard-won human experience that developed those taboos concern "human rights" geniuses like Fortney? His job is to tear civilization down. Visit San Fransicko and enjoy the "enlightened" stink.

12 posted on 05/16/2008 2:02:29 PM PDT by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: HwyChile

“Mainstreamed” Mormons have more social capital to lose with the legalizatino of polygamy than any other organized group in the country. Over a hundred years of effort to mainstream the cult will have been wiped away by a minority splinter group of polygamists if the polygamists put forward a legal challenge to the definition of marriage as only between two people, in the state of California, in today’s political and judicial climate.

Ask yourself why should polygamists NOT put forth a legal challenge? Ask yourself why a religion that is based on eternal celestial polygamy would NOT want to lose the more valuable social acceptance in the American society rather than follow the word and teachings of their prophets. Profits over prophets argument.

If you are a Mormon that believes the church teachings that one day polygamy is to be legal in this world again, would this not be considered The Sign that the time has come?

The Salt Lake based Church is going to be fighting off attempts by splinter groups to challenge this in California for the next several decades.


13 posted on 05/16/2008 2:02:50 PM PDT by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle

Just another idiot spreading joy and wisdom in the hallowed halls of the US Congress.


14 posted on 05/16/2008 2:03:17 PM PDT by jwalsh07 (El Nino is climate, La Nina is weather.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle
I want to find one of those cats that some rich widow left $10 million to. Then I'll grab the cat and move to California and claim the right to marry.

"Who are you to question our love? This is a civil rights issue, not a religious issue. Stay out of our bedroom."

15 posted on 05/16/2008 2:05:19 PM PDT by Hardastarboard (I have Zero Tolerance for Zero Tolerance policies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle

This turd is a raving lunatic.

Had I not known who said this from the beginning I would have sworn that it was the ramblings of a deranged mental patient.


16 posted on 05/16/2008 2:05:56 PM PDT by frankiep (Democrats base their ideology on the premise that you are too stupid to do anything for yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kjo

I agree.

I keep telling myself this is Biblical prophecy writ large. I thought the people paid to represent this country understood that they walk knee-deep in the blood of their countrymen and our forebears. To witness such cowardice, corruption and knavery over and over turns the image of all that white of the DC buildings to melting lava in my mind.

Pirates are everywhere.


17 posted on 05/16/2008 2:08:15 PM PDT by combat_boots (She lives! 22 weeks, 9.5 inches. Go, baby, go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle

can somebody can this jackass?


18 posted on 05/16/2008 2:16:40 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bernard Marx
what really kills me is that these state rights are unfair.....two homos can say they are "married" yet they don't have to pay the marriage penalty to the feds...

once all barriers are down, you won't see many gays marrying because they'll find out this country SCREWS married people.......

quick...somebody...find us a country.....or a state ....to move too...

19 posted on 05/16/2008 2:19:31 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle
Gay Mormons

Now THERE's a picture!

OF course; if the Living Prophet® said GOD TOLD ME, and the 12 yesmen agreed; we'd have Flamin' Faith meetings TOMORROW!!


http://www.gaymormonstories.com/

20 posted on 05/16/2008 2:25:09 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson