Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Joseph Smith Marries the Wives of Other Men
Some files of interest re: Mormonism ^ | Feb 14, 1997 | James David

Posted on 05/10/2008 11:06:21 AM PDT by AnalogReigns

There is substantial evidence to show that Joseph Smith was sealed to the wives of other men. This occurred while the men were still legally married to their wives. Sometimes these second marriages even occurred outside the presence of their husbands. Many of the poor guys were on their missions when Joseph Smith married their wives. The most unfortunate men came back from their missions with their wives pregnant. How would you feel if the Prophet asked you for your wife? How would you feel if you came back from a business trip or a mission to find your wife months into pregnancy?

I should not be leaving the female audience out of this debate. How do you think the women felt about this? Their husbands were away on missions, and Joseph, a "Prophet of God", desired to marry them and have them for himself. What would your response be to this?

The question has now been asked of you, "Would you give your wife to Joseph Smith or any Prophet?" What is your response?

If you said, "Yes", then you share the same answer that some men gave to Joseph.

In this article we are going to be dealing with a couple of issues. There are going to be a lot of people that have no idea what I am talking about, so I have provided a lot of my documentation in this article.

The first hint that led me to believe that Joseph Smith married the wives of other men was in a speech given by Jedidiah Grant on February 19, 1854. (See Journal of Discourses, vol. 2, pg. 14)

Imagine yourself listening to a sermon by the second counselor of the Prophet:

"I would ask you if Jehovah has not in all ages tried His people by the power of Lucifer and his associates; and on the other hand, has He not tried them and proved them by His Prophets? Did the Lord actually want Abraham to kill Isaac? Did the Prophet Joseph want every man's wife he asked for? He did not, but in that thing was the grand thread of the Priesthood developed. The grand object in view was to try the people of God, to see what was in them. If such a man of God should come to me and say, "I want your gold and silver, or your wives," I should say, "Here they are, I wish I had more to give you, take all I have got."

There are a couple of ways that you could interpret this sermon. First, you could say that Joseph Smith never asked such things, but this has been verified by reliable accounts, including one of Heber C.Kimball (Stanley Kimball, "Mormon Patriarch and Pioneer", University of Illinois Press, 1981, pg.93). The second foreseeable argument is that this was only a "test".

In this lengthy article I will attempt to show that Joseph Smith not only asked for the wives of married men, but that he actually married them both for "time" and "eternity". Some may then argue that Joseph never consummated the relationships. This may be difficult for me to prove, but I will make an effort at it.

Going back to Jeridiah's speech. He alluded to the story of Isaac and Abraham when Abraham was going to sacrifice his son (Genesis 22).

Think about it - "Would there have been a threat to Isaac if Abraham did not have a knife to slay his son? Would Isaac have been in jeopardy if his father had not bound him?" In my opinion, there would have been no test if there wasn't the possibility that Isaac could have been killed.

Now I pose a similar question "How could Joseph be testing men if there was not the knowledge that he had already married other men's wives?" In my opinion, the threat of Joseph marring another man's wife was real -- Joseph had married the wives of other men! This I intend to show to you beyond any reasonable doubt.

In my attempt to show that Joseph married other men's wives I will use some "anti" Mormon sources. But, because I realize that my Mormon audience will likely ignore these sources I will keep them to a minimum.

It's very interesting to note that it was the apostates and non- Mormons that showed that Joseph Smith practiced polygamy during the early years of the church. At this time, the LDS Church and Joseph Smith denied the practice, yet now, almost everyone knows that Joseph had plural wives. At that time there was truth to the apostate's statements and there is truth to their statements today.

JOSEPH'S PLURAL WIVES Lucinda Pendelton Morgan Harris Birthday: September 27, 1801 Second Husband: George Washington Harris First Husband: Famous Anti-Mason, William Morgan Date of marriage to George: January 12, 1831

Joseph Smith likely married Lucinda in 1838 when she was staying at the Harris home in Far West (History of the Church, vol. 3, pg. 9). This is supported by a statement made by Mrs. Sarah Pratt, "Mrs. Harris was a married lady, a very great friend of mine. When Joseph had made his dastardly attempt on me [in 1842], I went to Mrs. Harris to unbosom my grief to her. To my utter astonishment, she said, laughing heartily: 'How foolish you are! Why, I am his mistress since four years'." (Mormon Portraits, 1886, pg. 60, "anti")

Prescindia Huntington Buell Birthday: September 7, 1810 Husband: Norman Buell Date of marriage to Norman: 1837

The Utah Church historian, Andrew Jensen provides the date of the marriage to Joseph on December 11, 1841. Prescindia's brother performed the ceremony. In 1846 Prescindia left Norman and later married Heber C. Kimball. (No Man Knows My History, Fawn Brodie, pg. 462, "anti").

Some may argue that Joseph never consummated his relationship with Prescindia. However, Oliver her son may have been Joseph's son. Oliver was looked upon by the Huntington family as the Prophet's son by sealing Oliver to Joseph. The diary entry for November 14, 1884 for Oliver Huntington says, "Then I stood Proxy for the Prophet Joseph Smith in having sealed or adopted to him a child of my sister Prescenda, had while living with Norman Buell."

At this point I am probably not doing to well in proving my point to my Mormon audience. There are likely two strikes against me for using the "anti" Mormon references. I will try to make a better case for Nancy Marinda Hyde. Nancy Marinda Johnson Hyde Birthday: June 28, 1815 Husband: Orson Hyde Date of marriage to Orson: September 4, 1834

Nancy was likely taught polygamy by Joseph when Orson Hyde was on his mission to Palestine. In 1841, Nancy was given a direct revelation through Joseph to "hearken to the counsel of my servant Joseph in all things whatsoever he shall teach unto her" (History of the Church, vol. 4, pg. 467).

Two of Nancy's children may have been the Prophet's. I researched the birthdays of both of the children and only with Frank Henry is there any substantial credence to this claim. Frank Henry was born on January 23, 1845. Orson Hyde had left on a mission to Washington on April 4, 1844 "immediately" after a meeting with Joseph Smith (History of the Church, pg. 286). The gestation period for a human is on average 266 days (not 9 months). Of course 266 is an average date and the figures vary. To give you an idea of the range, only four percent of pregnancies are actually carried two weeks or more beyond the average time (Guttmacher, 1983).

Frank Henry was born on January 23, 1845. Orson Hyde left for Washington April 4, 1844. The difference in these two dates is 294 days! That is almost a month longer than expected and is basically physiologically impossible, especially considering that Orson Hyde had not returned to Nauvoo until August 6, 1844 (Andrew Jenson, Church Chronology, August 6, 1844). Zina Diantha Huntington Jacobs Birthday: January 31, 1821 Husband: Henry B. Jacobs Date of marriage to Henry: March 7, 1841

Joseph Smith was married to Zina shortly after her marriage to Henry Jacobs. Zina has been recorded as saying, "I wish to bear my testimony to the principle of celestial marriage, that it is true ......I became [Joseph's] wife at this time in Nauvoo and I never in my life had a rebellious thought against that principle, for which I thank the Lord." (Collected Discourses, vol. 5, Joseph F. Smith, December 23, 1894)

Statements written by apostates strengthen this evidence. For instance, John D. Lee wrote that "I then took a tour down through Illinois [winter 1842]. H.B. Jacobs accompanied me as a fellow companion on the way. Jacobs was bragging about his wife, what a true, virtuous, lovely woman she was. He almost worshipped her. Little did he think that in his absence she was sealed to Prophet Joseph" (Mormonism Unveiled, p 132, "anti"). William Hall's statement in his book supported this statement further: " A Mr. Henry Jacobs had his wife seduced by Joe Smith, in his time, during a mission to England." (The Abominations of Mormonism Exposed, pg. 43-44, "anti").

Zina had not left Jacobs until 1846 which means that Joseph Smith married a woman that was already married.

For a look at more evidence read "All Things Move in Order in the City": The Nauvoo Diary of Zina Diantha Huntington Jacobs, Edited by Maureen Ursenbach Beecher, BYU Studies, Vol. 19, No. 3, p.285 Mary Elizabeth Rollins Lightner Birthday: April 9, 1818 Husband: Adam Lightner Date of Marriage to Adam: August 11, 1835

Mary admitted her marriage to Joseph Smith in a public address. She said in part, "I am the first being that the revelation was given to him for and I was one thousand miles away in Missouri, for we went up to Jackson County in 1841 ..... I went forward and was sealed to him. Brigham young performed the sealing, and Heber C. Kimball the blessing. I know he had six wives and I have known some of them from childhood up. I knew he had three children. They told me. I think two are living today, but they are not known as his children as they go by other names." (Mary Lightner,1905 Address, typescript, BYU, Pg. 2-3)

In another statement Mary Lightner said, "Joseph said I was his before I came here and he said all the Devils in Hell should never get me from him. I was sealed to him in the Masonic Hall, over the old brick store by Brigham Young in February 1842 and then again in the Nauvoo Temple by Heber C. Kimball." (Original sworn affidavit owned by Mrs. Nell Osborne of Salt Lake City, February 8, 1902). Patty Bartlett Sessions Birthday: February 4, 1795 Husband: David Sessions Date of marriage to David: June 28, 1812

Patty Sessions was sealed to Joseph Smith on March 9, 1842 as indicated by her personal journal entry, "I was sealed to Joseph Smith by Willard Richards March 9, 1842, in Newel K. Whitney's chamber, Nauvoo, for time and all eternity ...." Fanny Young Murray Birthday: November 8, 1787 Husband: Roswell Murray Date of marriage to Roswell: 1832

Brigham Young reported the marriage of his sister to Joseph Smith in the Journal of Discourse: "As far as this pertains to our natural lives here, there are some who say it is very hard. They say, 'This is rather a hard business; I don't like my husband to take a plurality of wives in the flesh.' Just a few words upon this. We would believe this doctrine entirely different from what it is presented to us, if we could do so. If we could make every man upon the earth get him a wife, live righteously and serve God, we would not be under necessity, perhaps, of taking more than one wife. But they will not do this; the people of God, therefore, have been commanded to take more wives. The women are entitled to salvation if they live according to the word that is given to them .... I recollect a sister conversing with Joseph Smith on this subject.... Joseph said, 'Sister, you talk very foolishly, you do not know what you will want.' He then said to me [B.Y.]: 'Here, brother Brigham you seal this lady to me.' I sealed her to him. This was my own sister according to the flesh." (Journal of Discourses, vol. 16, pg. 166-167).

The marriage ceremony occurred on November 2, 1843 according to Andrew Jenson, LDS Church Historian. (No Man Knows My History, Fawn Brodie, pg. 484, "anti"). POLYGAMY WAS AGAINST THE LAW:

Polygamy was against the law in Illinois. An Illinois state law was enacted February 12, 1833:

"Bigamy consists in the having of two wives or two husbands at one and the same time, knowing that the former husband or wife is still alive. If any person or persons within the State, being married, or who shall hereafter marry, do at any time marry any person or persons, the former husband or wife being alive, the person so offended shall, on conviction thereof, be punished by a fine, not exceeding one thousand dollars, and imprisoned in the penitentiary, not exceeding two years." (Revised Laws of Illinois, Vandalia: Greiner & Sherman, 1833, pg. 198-199).

POLYGAMY WAS AGAINST THE DOCTRINE AND COVENANTS:

The first edition of the Doctrine and Covenants (1835) included a section on LDS Marriages:

"Inasmuch as this Church of Christ has been reproached with the crime of fornication and polygamy, we declare that we believe that one man should have one wife, and one woman but one husband, except in the case of death, when either is at liberty to marry again." (History of the Church, vol. 2, pg. 247, it is interesting to note that this section in the D&C was in every single edition until 1876 when the D&C first included D&C 132).

One of the best books on the subject of Mormon polygamy is "Mormon Polygamy; A History", by Richard S. Van Wagoner, Signature Books, Salt Lake City, 1989, 2nd edition.

Another source which may be helpful is Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought, vol. 29, No. 2 "A Trajectory of Plurality: An Overview of Joseph Smith's Thirty-three Plural Wives".

Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought, vol. 27, No.l, Spring 1994 "Nauvoo Roots of Mormon Polygamy, 1841-46: A Preliminary Demographic Report" by George D. Smith. pp.1-72.


TOPICS: Ecumenism; History; Other Christian; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: josephsmith; lds; mormon; mormonism; nonconsummation; polygamy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: Ron Jeremy

LOL


41 posted on 05/10/2008 1:55:48 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana
He had stolen David’s wife... Michal was David’s legal wife.. Actually Michal was the 2nd wife that Saul had taken off David and given to another man... Because he was jealous of David..

Is there any mention of who Michal wanted to be married to? Or is she just property for the purposes of this story?

42 posted on 05/10/2008 1:57:37 PM PDT by Ron Jeremy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: restornu; ZX12R; Tennessee Nana; Regulator
Keep your focus on the topic not attacking the poster!

Here's a poster I think we can all attack:


43 posted on 05/10/2008 1:58:02 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: restornu
The Lord’s purpose of Plural marriage is about reconciliation bring back into the fold and welding family lines for all eternity!

Truly, I am ignorant of all this. Is this from the bible, or another source?

44 posted on 05/10/2008 1:59:18 PM PDT by Ron Jeremy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

Isn’t she more like 120-150 feet?


45 posted on 05/10/2008 2:00:14 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
Isn’t she more like 120-150 feet?

Attacking the poster, huh?

Any other insults you want to throw at the poster?

46 posted on 05/10/2008 2:02:10 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Ron Jeremy

No

It’s not in the Bible

It’s just something that the false prophet Joseph Smith made up when his wife caught him cheating on her...


47 posted on 05/10/2008 2:02:37 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana
It’s just something that the false prophet Joseph Smith made up when his wife caught him cheating on her...

Was he boning her on earth, or just for all eternity?

48 posted on 05/10/2008 2:05:06 PM PDT by Ron Jeremy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Ron Jeremy

Michal was in love with David...

And Michal Saul’s daughter loved David: and they told Saul, and the thing pleased him. 1 Samuel 18:20


49 posted on 05/10/2008 2:07:43 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Ron Jeremy

Emma his wife caught him in the act...


50 posted on 05/10/2008 2:08:31 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
It's a beautiful poster. I wonder how much an original is worth.
51 posted on 05/10/2008 2:14:41 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
It's a beautiful poster. I wonder how much an original is worth.

I think the poster is a bit odd.
52 posted on 05/10/2008 2:17:33 PM PDT by ZX12R
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: ZX12R
I think the poster is a bit odd.

Well, there are four immediate things: 1. the yellow sky, but the poster would have lost impact if they sky had been blue, 2. there are two cars in mid-collision and two guys running ahead of it. If they came from the stopped car ahead of them, why would they have gone back toward the woman and into traffic? 3. She's holding a car in her left hand on an upraised palm. It would have been more natural to have been picking it up from the top like picking up a brick or a loaf of bread. 4. The look of the action is as though she had suddenly just popped out of thin air.
53 posted on 05/10/2008 2:32:39 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy

David paid dearly for this sin.
Are you equating Joe with King David?


54 posted on 05/10/2008 2:48:01 PM PDT by svcw (There is no plan B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
Well, there are four immediate things: 1. the yellow sky, but the poster would have lost impact if they sky had been blue, 2. there are two cars in mid-collision and two guys running ahead of it. If they came from the stopped car ahead of them, why would they have gone back toward the woman and into traffic? 3. She's holding a car in her left hand on an upraised palm. It would have been more natural to have been picking it up from the top like picking up a brick or a loaf of bread. 4. The look of the action is as though she had suddenly just popped out of thin air.

Touche, but you missed one. She is mostly attacking people who were driving in blue cars. Now what is the symbolism in that? I submit that it is because the poster of the poster knows that the covers that bind the book of mormon are not really black, but a very very deep shade of blue, and that this odd poster was selected for that very sinister reason.
55 posted on 05/10/2008 2:49:34 PM PDT by ZX12R
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy

Oh yea. I am pretty sure she despised David because he took his clothes off and danced around in the streets praising God. But you would know for sure because you read the “Bible” accounts.


56 posted on 05/10/2008 2:50:41 PM PDT by svcw (There is no plan B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AnalogReigns
"I would ask you if Jehovah has not in all ages tried His people by the power of Lucifer and his associates; and on the other hand, has He not tried them and proved them by His Prophets? Did the Lord actually want Abraham to kill Isaac? Did the Prophet Joseph want every man's wife he asked for? He did not, but in that thing was the grand thread of the Priesthood developed. The grand object in view was to try the people of God, to see what was in them. If such a man of God should come to me and say, "I want your gold and silver, or your wives," I should say, "Here they are, I wish I had more to give you, take all I have got."

This is very explosive stuff.

57 posted on 05/10/2008 3:43:44 PM PDT by e.Shubee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
I was reading the Bible the other day and read again the disturbing (to me anyway) account of King David stealing the wife of another man - no, I’m not talking about Bathsheba and Uriah - I’m talking about Michal, Saul’s daughter. Michal’s husband was weeping over the loss of his wife. Later Michal “despised” David in her heart.

dont fret Saundra......your faith believes the Bible is only correct "as translated", so it's likely it's just translated wrong (sarc)

58 posted on 05/10/2008 4:01:09 PM PDT by Revelation 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AnalogReigns
Joseph Smith Marries the Wives of Other Men

Ah, crap.

And him being dead and everything.. that's just gross.

He's like a mouldering corpse and still shagging teeny girls?

What an immortal pervo puke he be.

59 posted on 05/10/2008 4:04:05 PM PDT by humblegunner (Che is Gay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: svcw
he took his clothes off and danced around in the streets praising God.

Were you at Mardi Gras 2004???

60 posted on 05/10/2008 4:05:45 PM PDT by humblegunner (Che is Gay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson