Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

80th Oscars a Dud, Preliminary Ratings Show 14 Percent Lower Than Least-Watched Ceremony
Fox News ^ | February 25, 2008

Posted on 02/25/2008 11:19:09 AM PST by Zakeet

LOS ANGELES — The Oscars were a ratings dud. More so than usual, even.

Preliminary ratings for the 80th annual Academy Awards telecast were 14 percent lower than the least-watched ceremony ever, according to Nielsen Media Research.

Nielsen said Monday that overnight ratings were also 21 percent lower than last year, when "The Departed" was named best picture.

The least-watched Oscars ceremony ever was in 2003, when there were 33 million viewers.

[Snip]

Nielsen has no estimate yet on how many people watched Sunday night, but based on ratings from the nation's biggest markets, the Oscars will be hard-pressed to avoid an ignominious record.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hollywood; msm; oscars; yawn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-154 next last
To: lmailbvmbipfwedu
I’d rather watch it rain on NASCAR.

Yep, that's what we did at my house.

I'd rather watch a Test Pattern than The Oscars!


101 posted on 02/25/2008 1:23:44 PM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: mel
I’m hooked on movies from the 40s, 50s and 60s. Real characters and story development. Today’s stuff is beyond scatological.
102 posted on 02/25/2008 1:25:17 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (ENERGY CRISIS made in Washington D. C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

look its the show that beats all of PMSNBC.


103 posted on 02/25/2008 1:25:49 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1

Since you brought up Star Wars, have you seen this cute video?
http://youtube.com/watch?v=EBM854BTGL0


104 posted on 02/25/2008 1:28:50 PM PST by llmc1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: phil1750; lmailbvmbipfwedu
OK! They finished the race about an hour ago.

Roush, Hendrick, Hendrick !!

105 posted on 02/25/2008 1:30:38 PM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

The Oscars were on last night?


106 posted on 02/25/2008 1:31:17 PM PST by al_c (Avoid the consequences of erudite vernacular utilized irrespective of necessity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sprite518

Could careless about junkies in Hollyweird giving themselves award after award.

Junkies who actually think we care what they think. High School drop outs spewing quotes from move-on.org. Most suffer guilt complexes because they make millions and live the high life for doing nothing more than act like other people.


107 posted on 02/25/2008 1:31:42 PM PST by Bitsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

What a freeking waste of time!I havent watched the AA show since 1972!


108 posted on 02/25/2008 1:39:11 PM PST by texson66 ("Tyranny is yielding to the lust of the governing." - Lord Moulton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
It’s not illegal to watch, just illegal to upload.

No, it is illegal to watch. It's piracy, any way you cut it.

If you don't like Hollywood politics, which most of us don't, then fine, don't buy their product.

But to say that you're "better" than Hollywood, and then go out and steal their product is the height of hypocrisy. And spare me your artificial distinctions of "uploading" vs. "streaming" - the movie is getting to your computer without you paying the asking price. Theft is theft.

109 posted on 02/25/2008 1:41:43 PM PST by Yossarian (Everyday, somewhere on the globe, somebody is pushing the frontier of stupidity...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

I am told that the original script for “Pretty Lady” had the girl as a heroin addict, and was a dark comedy where they split up in the end. Supposedly the original author (who was, of course, well paid for his story) was upset Hollywood made it into a feel good movie. (Same story with Shreck One, I am told.)


110 posted on 02/25/2008 1:42:38 PM PST by 50sDad (Liberals: Never Happy, Never Grateful, Never Right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

You are right, but do you watch them over and over again. If you have any age on you at all. You have seen them all at least twice.


111 posted on 02/25/2008 1:43:50 PM PST by mel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
80th Oscars a Dud, Preliminary Ratings Show 14 Percent Lower Than Least-Watched Ceremony

What's his name, the host? He was boooorrrrriiiiiiinnnnnggggg!!!!!

I actually tuned in for the beginning of the show and tried to listen to the monologue from the host, whatshisnameagain?, and I just couldn't stand it. So I switched over to something a lot more entertaining, like the re-runs of ultimate fighter cage-fights. I still don't know his name and I don't know who won what, But, I'm Ok because I really don't care.
112 posted on 02/25/2008 1:47:43 PM PST by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Emmett McCarthy
Millionaires patting themselves on the back for how great they are is too much even for a movie buff like me. Its ridiculously self-absorbed, and the glitz and glamor of Hollywood is becoming less important in people's lives.

People still love movies, but the only surviving part of the Hollywood social scene lives in those stupid women's magazines where they details red carpet dresses and other nonsense.

If every man in America could get his wife or girlfriend to give up those dumb magazines like Us and People, we could render the Hollywood gossip factor moot, and we wouldn't have to listen to their stupid political beliefs.

Wishful thinking though. I've seen even the most intelligent woman addicted to reading those damn things.

113 posted on 02/25/2008 1:51:08 PM PST by GunRunner (Vote for Obama, because the past is history, the future is yet to come, and platitudes are forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mel
I saw an oldie that I had never seen just a few weeks ago. But you’re right, I’m running out of pix I have not seen. Maybe I’ll switch to old English movies. Then, of course, there are the French and Spanish movies, and the Japanese. You never know how those Tonosama samurai cutemups are going to turn out...
114 posted on 02/25/2008 1:51:37 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (ENERGY CRISIS made in Washington D. C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: TNCMAXQ
If the ratings continue to slide they will go the route of the Miss America show and get knocked off a major network.

Being a crew person who works live televised events (sports & entertainment), I am familiar with the cost of putting a telecast like this on the air, and my estimate is (conservatively) that this costs the producers at least $250,000.00 based on a three-day window (two setup days and the telecast day). If they used more days for set up, that would add on to the price.

Now, I have no idea what they charge for commercial time (certainly more than the average TV show but nowhere near the Super Bowl), but if they continue to drop year to year in the ratings, they will be hard pressed to make any money by selling time to sponsors.

I'd give it another year before they move to some obscure cable channel like Oxygen.

115 posted on 02/25/2008 1:53:34 PM PST by peteram
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: llmc1
Check out this Star Wars video called "Vader Sessions." One of the funniest Star Wars parodies ever made. "

http://youtube.com/watch?v=6A0rwG39Jzk

116 posted on 02/25/2008 1:53:44 PM PST by Free ThinkerNY ((((Truth shall set you free))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Yossarian

It’s no different than going to my nephew’s theater on his free passes. Sometimes I pay, sometimes I watch it again on the computer. In the end I buy the DVD. Sorry, not a bit of guilt about it.

And perhaps you can show me the law that says it is illegal to watch? You won’t find it.


117 posted on 02/25/2008 1:54:42 PM PST by netmilsmom (Giving up "Hairspray" and the cast for Lent. Prayers appreciated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

bump for later


118 posted on 02/25/2008 1:55:45 PM PST by mel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
"The Oscars were on last night ? Who knew ?"

I only found out this morning when I saw the picture of one of the winners , someone I've never heard of, on the front page of my morning newspaper.

119 posted on 02/25/2008 1:56:23 PM PST by blam (Secure the border and enforce the law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner

I really lost interest in these movies when these stars got so vocal. They should have just stuck with sex scandals.
Bug eyed Sarandon, nutcase Cruise, bigmouth Roberts (remember what she called Republicans), Katrina fake Penn, the list goes on and on. How can I sit there and watch one of their movies and enjoy it while all the time I am thinking about their socialist, anti american statements.
At least with these series, the actors aren’t such big names, that their stupid statements make headlines.


120 posted on 02/25/2008 2:02:50 PM PST by mel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-154 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson