Skip to comments.
Bobby Lee Cutts Verdicts
FOX News
Posted on 02/15/2008 8:06:44 AM PST by CitizenM
Developing...Bobby Lee Cuts found guilty of murdering his wife, but not aggrivated murder. Found guilty of aggrivated murder of his unborn baby.
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cutts; donutwatch; leo; murder
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
1
posted on
02/15/2008 8:06:45 AM PST
by
CitizenM
To: CitizenM
Sorry, it is Cutts, not Cuts. And I believe Davis was the mother of the unborn baby, but they were not married. There are other charges being read now.
2
posted on
02/15/2008 8:09:34 AM PST
by
CitizenM
("An excuse is worse than an lie, because an excuse is a lie hidden." Pope John Paul, II)
To: CitizenM
I don’t get the distinction between aggravated murder and not. Any help here?
3
posted on
02/15/2008 8:09:41 AM PST
by
Damocles
(MexAmeriCananda - Coming Soon To A Global Economy Near You!)
To: Damocles
I dont get the distinction between aggravated murder and not. Death penalty, maybe?
4
posted on
02/15/2008 8:12:37 AM PST
by
mwilli20
To: Damocles
I am not sure, either. I think a verdict of "murder" carries a lesser sentance than "aggrivated murder," but how they make the distinction is a legal thing. When all the verdicts are read I am sure they will be posted on FOX.
This fellow was real "cool" during the trial, and worked hard to appear penetant. At least he didn't fool this jury like OJ did!
5
posted on
02/15/2008 8:14:01 AM PST
by
CitizenM
("An excuse is worse than an lie, because an excuse is a lie hidden." Pope John Paul, II)
To: CitizenM
Cuts will be what former Officer Cutts gets in the Big House...
6
posted on
02/15/2008 8:14:29 AM PST
by
LRS
(It's time to put Hillary on the 3:10 to Yuma...)
To: Damocles
From wiki:
"Aggravation is a concept in law, which Black's Law Dictionary defines as: "Any circumstance attending the commission of a crime or tort which increases its guilt or enormity or adds to its injurious consequences, but which is above and beyond the essential constituents of the crime or tort itself." For example, aggravated assault is usually differentiated from simple assault by the offender's intent (i.e., to murder, to rape etc.), the extent of the injury to the victim, or the use of a deadly weapon. An aggravating circumstance is a kind of attendant circumstance and the opposite of an extenuating or mitigating circumstance, which decreases guilt."
7
posted on
02/15/2008 8:14:58 AM PST
by
Eepsy
(The object of opening the mind, as of opening the mouth, is to shut it again on something solid.)
To: Damocles
GLenn Beck has someone on who makes the distinction. Aggravated means something worse than muder due to what he did to the unborn.
8
posted on
02/15/2008 8:15:09 AM PST
by
lysie
To: Damocles
The scumbag contended it was an accident. That in his attempt to leave her house, his elbow came into contact with her throat and caused her to fall down.
They were not married but, she had a child with him previously. He was also married with I believe two additional children. A real role model for society.....
9
posted on
02/15/2008 8:15:09 AM PST
by
The Forgotten Man
(He works, he votes, generally he prays--but he always pays....)
To: Damocles
Aggravated murder is Ohio’s version of first degree murder. It requires purpose and design.
Murder, on the other hand, is killing without such design.
To: Damocles
Aggravated murder would be something that was planned and deliberate.
11
posted on
02/15/2008 8:16:18 AM PST
by
Red_Devil 232
(VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
To: lysie
I was just listening to that. So he is on the hook for the death of the child as far as the death penalty is concerned.
12
posted on
02/15/2008 8:17:36 AM PST
by
Damocles
(MexAmeriCananda - Coming Soon To A Global Economy Near You!)
To: Damocles
In practical terms I think it means that, even had he not meant to murder the pregnant woman, had he called a frikkin’ ambulance instead of hiding the crime, the unborn child would have most likely survived.
13
posted on
02/15/2008 8:18:15 AM PST
by
Eepsy
(The object of opening the mind, as of opening the mouth, is to shut it again on something solid.)
To: CitizenM
I am happy the unborn baby was viewed as a person as well.
14
posted on
02/15/2008 8:18:43 AM PST
by
AbeKrieger
(There is a special place in Hell for Lyndon Johnson.)
To: AbeKrieger
15
posted on
02/15/2008 8:21:05 AM PST
by
lysie
To: Red_Devil 232
Thanks, all of you for the clarification. So the murder of his lover was "unplanned," but because she was pregnant, they consider that the murder of her caused the death of their unborn child, so that child's murder was considered "aggrivated." That means he is subject to the death sentance for the murder of the child.
There are some other charges for which he was found guilty also, I think one was "endangering the life of a child."
Whatever, he will get what he deserves. It never surprises me that these people who don't get married, have multiple partners and children, lie, and live immoral lives always think they can get away with worse crimes. Society is full of them today. Nothing is sacred, nothing is beyond them doing. They have no self-discipline, no value for life. EXCEPT their own - they will do anything, say anything to save their own skin. Disgusting.
16
posted on
02/15/2008 8:25:17 AM PST
by
CitizenM
("An excuse is worse than an lie, because an excuse is a lie hidden." Pope John Paul, II)
To: AbeKrieger
Yes...for sure. The woman was 9 months pregnant. Tell me how that is considered murder versus the planned abortion of a baby less than 3 months not being considered murder??? I never could understand the way people rationalize that a life is not a life from the moment of conception on. This verdict might help the "Right to Life" movement.
Can anyone recall what the verdict was for the death of the baby of the Peterson couple a few years ago?
17
posted on
02/15/2008 8:29:16 AM PST
by
CitizenM
("An excuse is worse than an lie, because an excuse is a lie hidden." Pope John Paul, II)
To: CitizenM
Has anyone ever publicly questioned NOW, or NARAL, or any of these other murderous operations, when a guilty of murder verdict is returned against the killer of an unborn child?
Is there anything in the public record on this? Or are they stonily silent?
18
posted on
02/15/2008 8:30:33 AM PST
by
AbeKrieger
(There is a special place in Hell for Lyndon Johnson.)
To: The Forgotten Man
The scumbag contended it was an accident.The old "I only meant to beat the sh*t out of her" defense?
To: AbeKrieger
I do know when the state legislature in Kentucky wanted to change the murder laws to further encompass unborn children, feminists/abortion activists protested, saying that it was opening the door for prosecutions against abortion doctors. As for the public record of NOW or NARAL, I am unsure.
20
posted on
02/15/2008 8:34:25 AM PST
by
IMissPresidentReagan
("Don't give up your ideals, don't compromise, don't turn to expediency..."Ronald Reagan, 1976)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson