[CitizenM]

Thanks, all of you for the clarification. So the murder of his lover was "unplanned," but because she was pregnant, they consider that the murder of her caused the death of their unborn child, so that child's murder was considered "aggrivated." That means he is subject to the death sentance for the murder of the child.

There are some other charges for which he was found guilty also, I think one was "endangering the life of a child."

Whatever, he will get what he deserves. It never surprises me that these people who don't get married, have multiple partners and children, lie, and live immoral lives always think they can get away with worse crimes. Society is full of them today. Nothing is sacred, nothing is beyond them doing. They have no self-discipline, no value for life. EXCEPT their own - they will do anything, say anything to save their own skin. Disgusting.

[AbeKrieger]

Has anyone ever publicly questioned NOW, or NARAL, or any of these other murderous operations, when a guilty of murder verdict is returned against the killer of an unborn child?

Is there anything in the public record on this? Or are they stonily silent?