Posted on 01/31/2008 9:29:37 PM PST by Yosemitest
Click on the photo to go to "youtube.com" to listen and watch it for yourself.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
Knock it off with the Hate crap.
Every time one of you Mitt supporters use that line you sound just like a democrat.
Nobody hates Mitt or Mormons.
Grow-up!
“Someone?” What happened to you? Did your fingers fall off and you’re typing with your thumbs?”
ROTFLMFAOWTIME!!! Ohhh... my hernia is about to bust... I can hardly see the keyboard!
"The Constitution Party" sounds interesting.
In 1992, a coalition of independent state parties united to form the U.S. Taxpayers Party. The U.S. Taxpayer's Party's goal was to limit the Federal Government to its constitutional boundaries and to restore civil government to the principles our country was founded upon. Some of the state affiliate parties have adopted the national party name, while others have adopted or retained a different name. In 1992, the partys presidential candidate, Howard Phillips, was on the ballot in 21 states, with Albion Knight Jr. as his running mate. In 1995, the party became the fifth political party to be formally recognized by the Federal Election Commission as a national political party. In 1996 the party achieved ballot access in 39 states, with Howard Phillips as its presidential nominee and Constitutional scholar Herb Titus as its vice-presidential nominee.
In 1999, at its national nominating convention for the 2000 elections, convention delegates chose to change the party name to "Constitution Party," believing that the new name better reflected the partys primary policy approach of enforcing the U.S. Constitutions provisions and limitations. Also at that convention, Howard Phillips was elected to be the partys presidential nominee for the 2000 elections. Dr. J. Curtis Frazier of Missouri was selected as his vice-presidential running mate at a meeting of the Party's National Committee over the Labor Day weekend of 2000.
In 2004, the Constitution Party nominated Michael Peroutka as its presidential candidate and Chuck Baldwin as his vice-presidential running mate.
The challenges our nation faces are dire and pervasive. Therefore, the Constitution Party maintains its focus on identifying, training and preparing candidates for future elections at all levels of government, from the local level on up. In support of this objective and to raise public awareness, the party has built its membership and organization at the state, county and local level.
The Constitution Party strongly champions the principles of government laid down by our Founding Fathers in the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution, principles which have been abandoned by our political establishment. Unlike other political organizations, we do not believe these principles are outdated. We recognize that the Constitution of the United States of America is the supreme law of the land and must be enforced.
The proper and lawful division of governmental authority among the Federal, State and local governments was an arrangement that the Founders rightly saw as necessary to preserving freedom and justice. Only after that federal, constitutional order is restored to its proper balance can we reverse Americas slide into lawlessness, corruption and tyranny.
The Constitution Party is the only party which is completely pro-life, pro-gun, pro-American sovereignty and independence, and in favor of a strong national defense. It is also the only party that is anti-globalist, anti-free trade, anti-deindustrialization, and anti-unchecked immigration. We also oppose special rights for homosexuals, the constantly increasing expansion of unlawful police laws,and both foreign aid and military interventionism.
This might be a good replacement for the GOP.
I agree with Ann. I’d vote for Hillary before I’d vote for McCain. However, I wouldn’t vote for either of them.
While still contemplating the Florida primary result, I came to the conclusion that voting for HILLARY!! might be the most Conservative vote I could mark, while smoking a cigarette and sipping a glass of lambusco in the garage this afternoon and now I’m told that one of the other 3 GreatMinds in the world has arrived at the same conclusion ?!? :) But I understand exactly what Ann said.
Worse than Clinton?
I must admit that I find Romney’s weak record on abortion to be very disturbing. Abortion is my main issue after national security. I just wish I had any confidence in McCain to nominate good judges.
Where have YOU been??? Not on the Romney threads apparently. Because we have been dealing with SOME posters, for about a year now, who undoubtedly hate Romney and despise the Mormon religion.
http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2006/03/10/catholic_charities_to_halt_adoptions_over_issue_involving_gays/
from the above article, Within an hour of Catholic Charities' announcement, Gov. Mitt Romney said he planned to file a bill that would allow religious organizations to seek an exemption from the state's anti-discrimination laws to provide adoption services. .... "While I respect the board's decision to stay true to their principles, I find the current state of the law deeply disturbing and a threat to religious freedom," he said
Its satire?
One can hope ;
Oh. Okay. It’ll just be our little secret! :)
I think she stole my thunder. I use absurdity to illustrate the absurd.
I doubted Anne’s ability and rationale once when she challenged the 9/11 widows. I winced. I didn’t get it and was about to trash her. But she paved the way. Now it is PC to slam any liberal plant.
It’s brilliant.
I think Earthdweller wants what the "liberal boyfriend" got.
I can understand her frustration.
I will be dissenting in a few ways myself.
1) On Super Tuesday, I will not be voting for McCain.
2) When McCain is nominated, ON THAT VERY DAY, the wife and I will be be at town hall changing our party affiliation from Republican to Independent.
3) When Election Day comes, I will be writing in Fred Thompson.
Here Here!!!
We need to start a club, "Republicans for Hillary".
Romney is running on a conservative platform, has conservative support, will be beholding to conservatives and therefore is going to have to govern that way, or risk his second term. That’s the way it works and most people seem to understand that. Unfortunately, in your ignorance, you don’t.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.