![](http://images.salon.com/news/feature/2007/06/02/ron_paul/story.jpg)
CNN's Dream Candidate--- 2008's Ross Perot...
1 posted on
12/23/2007 7:36:19 PM PST by
melt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
To: melt
if does this, does he take any republican voters with him ?
2 posted on
12/23/2007 7:38:22 PM PST by
stylin19a
To: melt
Ron Paul proving his word is not worth piddle. He has told us several times he promised his wife he would not run as an independent. What type of man then wavers on a promise to his wife of that magnitude?
3 posted on
12/23/2007 7:40:25 PM PST by
jrooney
(Ron Paul makes Jimmy Carter look tough and Dennis Kucinich look sane.)
To: melt
![](http://cache.wonkette.com/images/thumbs/0f659b938fc26dead3e808622de3f864.jpg)
Oh, Cynthia, your running mate awaits you.
4 posted on
12/23/2007 7:43:12 PM PST by
fieldmarshaldj
(~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
To: melt
He’ll have trouble running his campaign from the locked ward of a psychiatric hospital which is where he desperately needs to be.
10 posted on
12/23/2007 7:50:04 PM PST by
Gay State Conservative
(Wanna see how bad it can get? Elect Hillary and find out.)
To: melt
He will run on the Cuckoo Bird Third Party ticket.
Judging from some responses on this forum, there are enough supports of this individual to help put Hitlery in the White House.
11 posted on
12/23/2007 7:51:17 PM PST by
ZULU
(Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts and guns made America great.)
To: All
14 posted on
12/23/2007 7:53:30 PM PST by
rlmorel
(Liberals: If the Truth would help them, they would use it.)
To: melt
Perot appealed to Republicans, Democrats, and mostly Independents. Ron Paul appeals to mostly KOOKS from what I’ve seen.
To: melt
The leftist moonbats love him. It’s not just the MSM trying to sabotage the Republican party. I see him linked on peacenik web sites, right next to Truthout and the like.
But he will also pull a certain number of “conservative” libertarians to vote for him, too, I’m afraid. I’m not sure which party would be hurt more.
16 posted on
12/23/2007 7:55:21 PM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: melt
"I deserve one weasel wiggle now and then, Tim!"That was pretty good.
I wonder if he was trying to raise the mental image of someone else?
To: melt
21 posted on
12/23/2007 8:03:45 PM PST by
wastedyears
("I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery." - Thomas Jefferson)
To: melt
Shouldn’t this disqualify him from being allowed to appear at the GOP debates? He doesn’t deserve official sanction as a Republican if he is going to run against the party.
27 posted on
12/23/2007 8:10:26 PM PST by
Defiant
(Huckabee puts the goober back in gubernatorial.)
To: melt
No escape, no mercy for anyone abetting the election of the USA’s enemies, the Democrats, in 2008. 2008.. seven years after 9/11.
No excuse is sufficient, no ego driven principle enough.
The die will be cast.
28 posted on
12/23/2007 8:16:28 PM PST by
Sunny Poipu
(Somebody else in Sunny Poipu for a while.)
To: melt
He might get as many votes as did Anderson from Illinois in what year was that? - although I think his were all hanging chads.
To: melt
I knew it. This kook can Perot enough votes to make another Clinton victory with less than 49% of the votes, for the 3rd time.
I wish the democrats were half as dumb as we are when it comes to elections, we would landslide the victories.
36 posted on
12/23/2007 8:43:53 PM PST by
GregoTX
(The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
To: melt
Does this mean we can go ahead and stop bringing him to the debates already? Jeez...
40 posted on
12/23/2007 8:52:52 PM PST by
Caipirabob
(Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
To: melt; Captain Kirk
I told you he was going to run 3rd party two months ago. Don’t forget our bet Captain Kirk.
If nothing else it should be entertaining watching GOP statists try to convince the libertarian part of their base to vote for Rudy/Huck aka Baby Killer/Nanny Stater ‘08 and not for the Libertarian candidate.
The same people who laughed at the “leave me, my rights and my money alone” libertarians will be begging and pleading for us to vote for their idiot GOP establishment nominee.
41 posted on
12/23/2007 8:53:47 PM PST by
Eric Blair 2084
(Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms shouldn't be a federal agency...it should be a convenience store.)
To: melt
Oh good, somebody got a photograph of him in one of his more lucid moments.
42 posted on
12/23/2007 8:53:58 PM PST by
Gator113
(My short list..Fred, Hunter, Romney.)
To: melt
43 posted on
12/23/2007 8:55:04 PM PST by
Chode
(American Hedonist)
To: All
To: melt
this isn’t fair...if i recall correctly he said he was 99% sure he wouldn’t run as a 3rd party
50 posted on
12/23/2007 9:15:06 PM PST by
ChurtleDawg
(kill em all)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson