Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: Sub-Driver
Fascist is as fascist does.
2 posted on
10/10/2007 11:17:15 AM PDT by
Doctor Raoul
(Columbia = Ayatollah U.)
To: Sub-Driver
I tend to believe the Spectator on this one. But with Waxman’s flat out denial (which isn’t a surprise), I hope the Spectator releases what the basis for their article was and the record is set straight, Waxman shown to be a liar, or the Spectator retracts its story.
4 posted on
10/10/2007 11:19:51 AM PDT by
Phantom Lord
(Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
To: Sub-Driver
Now Waxy has done it. Either he is lying or he failed to obey the demands of the nut log voter base he serves. One way or the other, he is going to get a snoot full!
But at least he doesn't have to worry about yanking out his hair!
To: Sub-Driver
Liberals want free speech. As long as they agree with what’s being said.
6 posted on
10/10/2007 11:21:21 AM PDT by
samtheman
To: Sub-Driver
"No, we're not doing that at all!"
Translation: "Keep transcribing folks."
9 posted on
10/10/2007 11:22:38 AM PDT by
theDentist
(Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
To: Sub-Driver
In his statement, Waxman called on the Spectator to "immediately retract the item and apologize for the confusion its fictitious report has caused." Watch out, Spectator! Waxman's caught your scent!
![](http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_100907/content/01125110.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg)
10 posted on
10/10/2007 11:23:20 AM PDT by
COBOL2Java
(The Democrat Party: radical Islam's last hope)
To: Sub-Driver
Have him make is denial under oath so he can be prosecuted if he is lying.
11 posted on
10/10/2007 11:23:38 AM PDT by
NeilGus
To: Sub-Driver
Waxman LIMBAUGH called on
the Spectator SENATOR REID to "immediately retract
the item HIS STATEMENTS ON THE SENATE FLOOR and apologize for the confusion
its fictitious report HIS LIES
has HAVE caused."
Fair and balanced...
13 posted on
10/10/2007 11:25:01 AM PDT by
SERKIT
("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
To: Sub-Driver
Rush reading this article NOW!!!
20 posted on
10/10/2007 11:34:20 AM PDT by
SierraWasp
(Stop the gutless forclosing on righteous Reaganesque conservatives in the GOP!!! Do it to Lefties!!!)
To: Sub-Driver
I think Waxman got caught with his hand in the cookie jar and is trying to forestall any real implications into his behavior.
If this gets legs, might be time to get him out of Congress for that kind of fascism. We'll see.
22 posted on
10/10/2007 11:35:45 AM PDT by
Pistolshot
(Richardson/Paul '08 - Sometimes this stuff just writes itself.)
To: Sub-Driver
http://www.house.gov/waxman/news_files/news_profiles_waxman_for_better_07_17_06.htm
Excerpt——”On this particular Tuesday, Brian Cohen is in his windowless warren, pulling together yet another report, this one on prescription costs for seniors in New York. Costco is beating the government’s new Medicare benefit by a long shot.
In his previous life, Cohen, 38, was an MIT scientist; here, he is the quintessential Waxman staffer. He could double his salary in the private sector. Instead, he works at a desk just big enough for a computer, a family picture and a banana. He says he does it because he believes he’s performing a public service.
Though most staff research is issued in the congressman’s name, this report will be released under the name of Rep. Carolyn Maloney, Democrat from New York; Waxman won’t be mentioned.
It is an idea the congressman came up with to expand his reach while in the minority. Any lawmaker in Congress can request a study tailor-made for a particular district. Waxman’s staff plugs in local figures; the same model can produce as many as 100 different analyses. Local newspapers usually pick them up and a spotlight is trained on an issue the White House or majority party prefers not to highlight. Cohen has done close to 1,000 of them.”——
23 posted on
10/10/2007 11:36:08 AM PDT by
LucyJo
To: Sub-Driver
Waxman was referring to a report Monday that he "has asked his investigative staff to begin compiling reports on Limbaugh, and fellow radio hosts Sean Hannity and Mark Levin based on transcripts from their shows" Parsing his words, I suspect that the investigation is based on something else other than the transcripts from their shows. Maybe tapes. Or maybe it's just Limbaugh he's investigating. In any event, you can bet that Waxman's comment is a lie in some regard.
To: Sub-Driver
I strongly suspect Waxman is raising hell with his own staff right now about the leak that forced him to lie....(chuckle)
33 posted on
10/10/2007 12:03:00 PM PDT by
Badeye
(Free Willie!)
To: Sub-Driver
He lobbed it into The American Spectator court. Time to lob back at him with their sources.
What Waxman is accused of is an abuse of power. Time to get him under oath.
37 posted on
10/10/2007 12:08:48 PM PDT by
mware
(Americans in armchairs....doing the job of the media.)
To: Sub-Driver
To: Sub-Driver
I notice that all three hosts names end with a letter greater than “G”. I guess that means Hillary doesn’t have their FBI files in the A-G collection she kept from the Clinton White House years...
I see Sandy Berger, master criminal thief has just been hired on the Hillary political team. Since 9/11 haven’t the American people suffered enough without more political thuggery?
To: Sub-Driver
Maybe someone in his staff said it because they thought it was true? Waxman really doesn’t have a dog in the fight since he didn’t vote in the last Fairness Doctrine Resolution.
44 posted on
10/10/2007 12:40:22 PM PDT by
tobyhill
(The media lies so much the truth is the exception)
To: Sub-Driver
I am not in favor of ad hominem attacks but I am compelled to say that every time I see a picture of Henry Waxman I think of the “bar scene” in Starwars.
To: Sub-Driver
Waxman called on the Spectator to “immediately retract the item and apologize for the confusion its fictitious report has caused.”....WOW, Waxman must want to apologize to Rush!!! No?
51 posted on
10/10/2007 1:06:31 PM PDT by
Safetgiver
(So simple, even a Muslim can do it.)
To: Sub-Driver
Don’t let up now boys we got em in full retreat. Keep firing !!
61 posted on
10/10/2007 7:34:58 PM PDT by
festus
(No matter how guilty you are a jury will probably get you off.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson