Watch out, Spectator! Waxman's caught your scent!
Fascist is as fascist does.
I tend to believe the Spectator on this one. But with Waxman’s flat out denial (which isn’t a surprise), I hope the Spectator releases what the basis for their article was and the record is set straight, Waxman shown to be a liar, or the Spectator retracts its story.
But at least he doesn't have to worry about yanking out his hair!
Liberals want free speech. As long as they agree with what’s being said.
Translation: "Keep transcribing folks."
Watch out, Spectator! Waxman's caught your scent!
Have him make is denial under oath so he can be prosecuted if he is lying.
Fair and balanced...
Rush reading this article NOW!!!
If this gets legs, might be time to get him out of Congress for that kind of fascism. We'll see.
http://www.house.gov/waxman/news_files/news_profiles_waxman_for_better_07_17_06.htm
Excerpt——”On this particular Tuesday, Brian Cohen is in his windowless warren, pulling together yet another report, this one on prescription costs for seniors in New York. Costco is beating the government’s new Medicare benefit by a long shot.
In his previous life, Cohen, 38, was an MIT scientist; here, he is the quintessential Waxman staffer. He could double his salary in the private sector. Instead, he works at a desk just big enough for a computer, a family picture and a banana. He says he does it because he believes he’s performing a public service.
Though most staff research is issued in the congressman’s name, this report will be released under the name of Rep. Carolyn Maloney, Democrat from New York; Waxman won’t be mentioned.
It is an idea the congressman came up with to expand his reach while in the minority. Any lawmaker in Congress can request a study tailor-made for a particular district. Waxman’s staff plugs in local figures; the same model can produce as many as 100 different analyses. Local newspapers usually pick them up and a spotlight is trained on an issue the White House or majority party prefers not to highlight. Cohen has done close to 1,000 of them.”——
Parsing his words, I suspect that the investigation is based on something else other than the transcripts from their shows. Maybe tapes. Or maybe it's just Limbaugh he's investigating. In any event, you can bet that Waxman's comment is a lie in some regard.
I strongly suspect Waxman is raising hell with his own staff right now about the leak that forced him to lie....(chuckle)
What Waxman is accused of is an abuse of power. Time to get him under oath.
What a sack of scheisse
I notice that all three hosts names end with a letter greater than “G”. I guess that means Hillary doesn’t have their FBI files in the A-G collection she kept from the Clinton White House years...
I see Sandy Berger, master criminal thief has just been hired on the Hillary political team. Since 9/11 haven’t the American people suffered enough without more political thuggery?
Waxman called on the Spectator to “immediately retract the item and apologize for the confusion its fictitious report has caused.”....WOW, Waxman must want to apologize to Rush!!! No?
Don’t let up now boys we got em in full retreat. Keep firing !!