Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sub-Driver

I tend to believe the Spectator on this one. But with Waxman’s flat out denial (which isn’t a surprise), I hope the Spectator releases what the basis for their article was and the record is set straight, Waxman shown to be a liar, or the Spectator retracts its story.


4 posted on 10/10/2007 11:19:51 AM PDT by Phantom Lord (Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Phantom Lord

Too late for a retraction, congressman. Next time, we’ll melt down your f’n phone.


7 posted on 10/10/2007 11:21:47 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Go Hawks !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Phantom Lord

Agreed, Waxman has provided no evidence whatsoever that the Spectator story was in error in any important regard.


8 posted on 10/10/2007 11:22:10 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson