Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Thompson Leads Giuliani While Clinton’s Lead over Obama Grows (Harris Poll)
Harris Interactive ^ | September 20, 2007

Posted on 09/20/2007 2:41:32 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

After officially declaring his candidacy, U.S. Senator Fred Thompson moves ahead of former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani in the race for the 2008 Republican presidential nomination. One-third (32%) of those who say they will vote in a Republican primary or caucus will vote for Thompson while 28 percent will vote for Giuliani. Much further back is John McCain, who continues his downward slide with 11 percent saying they would vote for the Arizona Senator, and 9 percent who say they would vote for former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney.

On the Democratic side, Senator Hillary Clinton continues to build on her large lead. Just under half (46%) of those who would vote in a Democratic primary or caucus would vote for the former First Lady while one-quarter (25%) would vote for Illinois Senator Barack Obama. Former vice president candidate and North Carolina Senator John Edwards is further back with 14 percent saying they would vote for him. No other candidate is in double digits.

These are some of the results of a Harris Poll of 2,372 U.S. adults surveyed online by Harris Interactive® between September 6 and 14, 2007. This survey included 769 adults who expect to vote in a Democratic primary or caucus and 504 adults who expect to vote in a Republican primary or caucus. Like all polls conducted well before an election, this should not be read as a prediction. Rather, it is a snap shot of the presidential “horse race”, at an early stage in the race.

Votes by Generation

One interesting difference is the support of the different generations. On the Democratic side, Senator Obama does better than Senator Clinton among Echo Boomers (those aged 18 to 29). While 42 percent of this youngest generation will vote for him, 37 percent will vote for her. However, in the age group that is most likely to actually vote, Matures (those 61 and older), Senator Clinton leads Senator Obama by a very wide margin (56% versus 16%). In fact, one in five Matures (21%) will vote for John Edwards, so he is ahead of Senator Obama as well in this key age group.

On the Republican side a similar difference occurs. One-third (33%) of both Echo Boomers and Generation Xers (30 to 41) will vote for Rudy Giuliani while Fred Thompson garners just 8 percent and 22 percent of these generations respectively. But, again among those generations more likely to vote, Fred Thompson is ahead. It is close among Baby Boomers (those aged 42 to 60) as one-third (33%) of this generation will vote for Giuliani and 37 percent will vote for Thompson. Among Matures, the lead is greater – 44 percent will vote for Thompson and 16 percent will vote for Giuliani. Interestingly, one in five (20%) of the youngest generation, Echo Boomers, say they will vote for the oldest candidate, John McCain.

Consideration

Before being asked to pick their first choice in the primary elections, all adults surveyed were also shown a list of all the main candidates in both parties and some other well-known Republicans and Democrats, and asked which of them they would consider voting for. They could name as many people, in both parties, as they wished. On the Democratic side, three-quarters of Democrats (76%) would consider Hillary Clinton while over half (58%) would consider Barack Obama and just under half (48%) would consider Al Gore. Among Independents, it’s a tie as 35 percent would consider Hillary Clinton and 34 percent would consider Barack Obama.

On the Republican side, just over half (52%) of Republicans would consider Rudy Giuliani and just under half (46%) would consider Fred Thompson. The next two Republicans are not even candidates as 39 percent of Republicans would consider former Secretary of State Colin Powell and 34 percent would consider current Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. Among Independents, 28 percent would each consider Rudy Giuliani and Colin Powell while one-quarter (23%) would consider John McCain and 20 percent Fred Thompson. Overall, more would consider a Democratic candidate over a Republican candidate but the gap has narrowed. In May, 71 percent would consider one of the Democratic candidates while 58 percent would consider one of the Republicans – a gap of 13 percent. Over the summer this has narrowed and today the gap is just six points – 66 percent would consider a Democratic leader and 60 percent would consider a Republican leader.

So What?

Now that Fred Thompson has ended his “flirtation” with the presidential race, it will be interesting to watch as he participates in debates and is actually campaigning. Does his rise to the top hold or was it pure star power? Time will tell. On the Democratic side, it appears that the race really is Hillary Clinton’s to lose at this point as her ever expanding lead is now at 21 percent. The two running in second place for each party’s nomination currently are tops with the youngest of voters. Barack Obama feels like one of them – his youth and vitality are something they can latch onto and relate to. Rudy Giuliani is one the main figures from the one major national event that has shaped their lives so far – September 11th. They feel drawn to him because of that. But, as both camps are aware, these youngest voters actually vote in the lowest of numbers. Can either campaign translate their popularity into turnout come primary or caucus day?

(See site for actual poll breakdown)


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008polls; algore; barackhusseinobama; barackobama; conservatism; conservatives; democrats; duncanhunter; election; election2008; electionpresident; elections; federalism; firstprinciples; fred; fredthompson; gop; harrispoll; hillary; hillaryclinton; johnedwards; johnmccain; mikehuckabee; mittromney; obama; pollingdata; polls; republicans; rinos; ronpaul; rudygiuliani; rudymcromney; thompson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 last
To: jmeagan

If this fairytale makes your day more power to you. But be advised that, that younger generation you speak of has been claimed by a lot of would be presidents only to find out that they are quite loud but don’t vote in large numbers. Us old buzzards however turn out in droves. Sorry!


101 posted on 09/20/2007 7:13:42 PM PDT by ontap (Just another backstabbing conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

I won’t vote for that ticket, and there isn’t a stronger Thompson supporter around.


102 posted on 09/20/2007 9:39:40 PM PDT by Politicalmom (Of the potential GOP front runners, FT has one of the better records on immigration.- NumbersUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: jackieaxe
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
103 posted on 09/20/2007 9:43:18 PM PDT by Politicalmom (Of the potential GOP front runners, FT has one of the better records on immigration.- NumbersUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

that Fred sure doesn’t know how to campaign...stumbling all the way to a lead


104 posted on 09/20/2007 9:45:26 PM PDT by wardaddy (Pigpen lives!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom

Thank ypu for your vote and paticipation in shaping America’s future.
- President Clinton will send you her thanks.


105 posted on 09/21/2007 4:15:31 AM PDT by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

another “vote for rudy or we’re all gonna die” prognostication? fred doesn’t need rudy as a running mate to beat hillary.


106 posted on 09/21/2007 4:19:52 AM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

Why don’t you go say that to Jim Robinson?

He says he won’t vote for Giuliani either.

I happen to think Giuliani would be worse for this country than the Hildebeast.


107 posted on 09/21/2007 6:49:24 AM PDT by Politicalmom (Of the potential GOP front runners, FT has one of the better records on immigration.- NumbersUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: bill1952
If Thompson chooses a RINO as a VP then he himself ain't the "REAL DEAL" and we can expect no better than Hillary anyway. Besides, if Hillary were to win, I suspect the return of Jesus Christ would interrupt her term in office. I really think we're that close. I hope and pray that we are and would wish for it to happen this instant!
108 posted on 09/21/2007 7:05:51 AM PDT by ExSoldier (Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom

Because I wrote it to you.

JR has stated that he will not support rudy for POTUS not the VP so you are assuming facts not in evidence.

Personnaly, I will vote for Fred, but if I don’t pervail, I will vote for anyone but Hillary!

As far as your last statement you are wrong but don’t worry. American taxpayers will pay the bill.


109 posted on 09/21/2007 8:30:14 AM PDT by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier
Hm. Well, thank you for your reply.

I do understand your sentiment but I have to make my decisions about the future course of America based on something else.

-bill

110 posted on 09/21/2007 8:32:38 AM PDT by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

No, Jim said he WOULD NOT VOTE FOR HIM.

I would assume that meant for any position.

I refuse to vote to put that creep so close to the Presidency.


111 posted on 09/21/2007 10:43:27 AM PDT by Politicalmom (Of the potential GOP front runners, FT has one of the better records on immigration.- NumbersUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: bill1952
I have to make my decisions about the future course of America based on something else.

Agreed and that's what makes this country so great!

112 posted on 09/21/2007 12:44:16 PM PDT by ExSoldier (Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier
If Mitt, Rudy or McLame are present on the ticket as a VP, then I think I'll still sit on my hands. Better the Devil you know wants to destroy you than the one who works from within.

I must agree with that. Furthermore, I don't think campaigning is the best way to beat her. It isn't a fair fight. (If it were, Hillary Clinton would not be IN it.)
The best way to beat her is to investigate her campaign financing practices, and collect enough evidence to prosecute her ass.

113 posted on 09/23/2007 10:50:41 AM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (Write. Phone. Fax. Demand answers. Demand questions!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom

Agreed. If Giuliani is on the ticket, I go elsewhere.


114 posted on 10/06/2007 8:29:52 AM PDT by B Knotts (Tancredo '08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: gridlock
"Too bad Fred got into the race too late and lacks the fire in the belly to succeed...."

Just playing devils advocate here, and "fire in the belly" is a very vague and ambiguous term.

IF "fire in the belly" means he's not running around like that idiot Obama proposing a pile of new programs and blapheming every opponent he has on a daily basis..maybe we need some of that now.

Maybe Mr. & Mrs. America is damn tired of the legacy seekers out there, and just to slow down and get our country secure again, and back in shape.

Fred - if nothing else - has steadfast principles and is nobody's fool. He says what thinks and seems to stand buy it.

At this stage in America we don't need someone who is constantly "doing something" every day...we need some "UN-doing". We've got a zillion stupid laws and taxes on the books that need to be eradicated.

We need some more "speak softly and carry a big stick" on a domestic and foreign level.

Idiots like clinton slashed the military, destroyed missile silos and half of our air forces just to kiss the commies collective asses, and now we have now position of power from which to deal with third world dictators like Iran, etc.

Almost every argument I've heard again Thompson is from someone with Hunter, Rudy, etc in their tagline. Go figure.

You don't have to run around barking like a chiuhauha to make a good leader, sometimes run silent-run deep is the better tact.

I think he would handle the press better...sometimes the more you say, the more the press and the left have to demogogue you.

We don't need any more clintons [used car salesmen] in the White House, nor anymore legacy seekers and power merchants. What we need is someone who truly loves this country, and is looking out for generations to come.

If hillary gets in, you probably should get out the old swastika and sew it on your sleeve. Go ahead and tell your boss to start sending 75% of your pay to the feds (IF you have a job left), and buy one of those "Home Remedies" books, as going to the doctor will be akin to going to the DMV to get you tag renewed. The exam will take 5 minutes, but he government red tape could take days.

/rant off
115 posted on 10/06/2007 9:29:32 AM PDT by FrankR (Sean Hannity - king of the Rudybots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: FrankR
Maybe Mr. & Mrs. America is damn tired of the legacy seekers out there, and just to slow down and get our country secure again, and back in shape.

You got that right. I remember back during the Clinton Administration, people would talk about the government doing this or that and spending Billions of Dollars to ensure Clinton's precious legacy as if that was a rational reason to do anything. Who really cares what people think of Bill Clinton in twenty or thirty years?

If a President wants to advocate some program to better the country, we can have a discussion. I think that nine times out of ten the proposals are wrong-headed and ultimately destructive, but that is a matter for policy debate. If the purpose of the program is just to make people feel better about a former President, how do you even argue with that? It is just so stupid, you realize that anybody advocating it has to be so far removed from reality that argument is futile.

We would do better selecting our President at random out of the phone book than we do by selecting from the group of people who want to be President so bad they will do anything to make it happen. These are the very last people you want in control of anything.

But given we are not going to start drawing names out of a hat anytime soon, you go for the guy who seems to have ambition balanced by humility, and who will not run over his mother to get into the White House. Fred Thompson is the pick of the litter, by that criteria.

116 posted on 10/06/2007 10:47:54 AM PDT by gridlock (C'mon people now / Smile on your Brother / Everybody get together / Try to love one anoth-kaBOOM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson