Coulter: Absolutely fabulist

JewishWorldReview.com ^ | 8/8/07 | Ann Coulter

[JWR_Editor]

In their latest demonstration of how much they love the troops, liberals have produced yet another anti-war hoax.

[Random Access]

Is it possible to believe that Americans are capable of the acts that Pvt. Beauchamp describes in The New Republic?

Of course it is.

If you belong to the party that keeps reelecting a Senator that walked away from a drowning girl.

[Guenevere]

In the 2nd picture, are those two guys....one behind and one on her left...bodyguards?

[kellynla]

I hope the Soldiers from Beauchamp’s unit SUE THE HELL OUT of the New Republic!

Semper Fi,
Kelly

[knews_hound]

Pinging the Coulter List.



On or off, ping me.

Cheers,

knewshound

[Rummyfan]

In the one pic, the man on Ann’s left.... I have seen Ann Coulter three times at CPAC and that guy has always been at her elbow during signature sessions... Ann Coulter’s bodyguard... I’d like to apply for that position!

[Loyal Buckeye]

Arthur Andersen was implicated in fewer frauds.

A little clarification for Ann. The feds ran a perfectly good firm out of business; Anderson was initially found guilty of a felony, which precluded the firm from practicing their main business, auditing. Subsequently, that verdict was overturned, as I recall.

[freema]

Ann’s got a hammer out.

[Stepan12]

Pamela Geller and Ann Coulter

[Stepan12]

[Candor7]

They look like guards, there are actually 3 of them.

I am glad Anne is taking precautions, the dem looney fringe is definitely desperate.

[RavenATB]

“Um, I don’t know about this column of A.Coulter’s.

Not going to reach most Dems.”

It really wouldn’t matter if it did. Democrats are not typically interested in truth when truth doesn’t support their agenda.

[Checkers]

That’s not right.

Gomer and Frank may have their flaws, but both are Americans.

[Cecily]

It’s just a gallery of military doofuses. You are right in that the only one who is not a self-serving weasel and creep is Gomer Pyle.

[RonDog]

They look like guards, there are actually 3 of them.

I am glad Ann is taking precautions, the dem looney fringe is definitely desperate.

Ann, with ONE of her ever-vigilant new friends

Note to DUmmies: It would NOT be a good idea to make any sudden moves ANYWHERE near Ann. :o)

[Diana in Wisconsin]

Add ‘Colonel Flagg’ from M*A*S*H and you’ll have a Full House, LOL!

[RonDog]

"...The New Republic has gone mad.

Perhaps the magazine brought its former employee, fantasist Steven Glass, out of retirement. It’s long past time for The New Republic to file for intellectual Chapter 7.

Arthur Andersen was implicated in fewer frauds.

It is hard to keep track of so many PROVEN liars in the media.

Fortunately, SeafoodGumbo has posted a BREIF SUMMARY for us, from wikipedia.org:

• 2 Journalism scandals in the United States
  • 2.1 Walter Duranty, The New York Times (1930s)
  • 2.2 Janet Cooke, Washington Post (1980-1981)
  • 2.3 "Waiting to Explode", Dateline NBC (1992)
  • 2.4 The Oregonian's coverage of the Packwood scandal (1992)
  • 2.5 Bob Wisehart, Sacramento Bee (1994)
  • 2.6 Stephen Glass, The New Republic (1998)
  • 2.7 Patricia Smith, Boston Globe (1998)
  • 2.8 Operation Tailwind, CNN NewsStand (1998)
  • 2.9 Mike Barnicle, Boston Globe (1998)
  • 2.10 Michael Gallagher (1998)
  • 2.11 Jay Forman, Slate (2001)
  • 2.12 Bob Greene, Chicago Tribune (2002)
  • 2.13 Christopher Newton, Associated Press (2002)
  • 2.14 Houston Chronicle Light Rail Controversy (2002)
  • 2.15 Brian Walski, The Los Angeles Times (2003)
  • 2.16 James Forlong, Sky News (2003)
  • 2.17 CNN coverage of Iraq and Eason Jordan (2003)
  • 2.18 Jayson Blair, The New York Times (2003)
  • 2.19 "Gropegate", The Los Angeles Times (2003)
  • 2.20 Jack Kelley, USA Today (2004)
  • 2.21 Stephen Dunphy, Seattle Times (2004)
  • 2.22 The Oregonian's coverage of the Goldschmidt scandal (2004)
  • 2.23 The Boston Globe's Fake "GI Rape" Photographs (2004)
  • 2.24 The ABC News election memo (2004)
  • 2.25 Carl Cameron, Fox News Channel (2004)
  • 2.26 CBS News and the "Killian Documents" (2004)
  • 2.27 Jeff Gannon, Talon News (2005)
  • 2.28 Thom Calandra, Marketwatch.com (2005)
  • 2.29 Eason Jordan, CNN (2005)
  • 2.30 Fake American hostage, Associated Press (2005)
  • 2.31 Eric Slater, Los Angeles Times (2005)
  • 2.32 Mitch Albom, Detroit Free Press (2005)
  • 2.33 Barbara Stewart, Boston Globe (2005)
  • 2.34 Diana Griego Erwin, Sacramento Bee (2005)
  • 2.35 Chris Cecil, Cartersville Daily News (2005)
  • 2.36 The Daily Egyptian's fake orphan (2005)
  • 2.37 Bush administration journalism scandals (2005)
  • 2.38 Jim Van Vliet, Sacramento Bee (2005)
  • 2.39 Nada Behziz, The Bakersfield Californian (2005)
  • 2.40 Tim Ryan, Honolulu Star-Bulletin (2006)
  • 2.41 Hassan Fattah, New York Times' Abu Ghraib photos (2006)
  • 2.42 Michael Hiltzik, The Los Angeles Times (2006)
  • 2.43 Paul Bradley, Richmond Times-Dispatch (2006)
  • 2.44 Philip Chien, Wired News (2006)
  • 2.45 Greg Mitchell, Editor & Publisher (2006)
  • 2.46 Adnan Hajj, Reuters (2006)
  • 2.47 Miami anti-Castro broadcasts (2006)
  • 2.48 Jack Hitt and New York Times Abortion/Infanticide Article (2006)
  • 2.49 Jacqueline Gonzalez, San Antonio Express News (2007)
  • 2.50 Maria Bartiromo, CNBC (2007)
  • 2.51 Allan Detrich, The Blade (2007)
  • 2.52 "Katie Couric's Notebook," CBSNews.com (2007)

[RonDog]

BREIF SUMMARY

Err, make that:

BRIEF SUMMARY

[D-fendr]

Can't be. Body guards for Ann Coulter would be much much smaller.

[Lancey Howard]

The New Republic finally revealed the "Baghdad Diarist" to be ... John Kerry! Actually it was Pvt. Scott Thomas Beauchamp, Democratic candidate for president circa 2028. (That gives him 20 years to learn to pronounce "Genghis.")

Nobody but nobody can string words together like the brilliant Ann Coulter.

[alloysteel]

“Arthur Andersen was implicated in fewer frauds.”

Ah, but that was just in financial terms, and no matter the immediate injury, money can be earned back. Not so with reputations and moral capital. The frauds perpetrated upon the people of this nation, and of the world, for that matter, impugning the honor and integrity of the adults that keep the fires of intellectual honesty burning, are of far greater scope and much more pernicious nature. Hijacking the language, and reversing the meanings of words over a span of less than a generation, is itself no mean feat. Not a very admirable one, either.

The New Republic covers itself with glory yet again. They have rarely embraced intellectual honesty, preferring to duck into innuendo and character assassination, in lieu of actually dealing with the facts of the matter.

If they were engaged in the practice of law, it would be clear that they would almost surely NEVER get it right. As an exercise in logic, there must be, somewhere, a factual basis for their reasoning.

Facts. If they do not have them, they will cheerfully make some up on the spot.