Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vick is latest to take rap for the rap in our culture (a black perspective)
St. Louis Post-Dispatch ^ | 07/20/2007 | Bryan Burwell

Posted on 07/23/2007 10:46:58 AM PDT by newgeezer

All the breathless debates about Michael Vick are missing the point. The bigger issue has nothing to do with whether or not he deserves the right of due process, or whether NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell should suspend him, or whether Atlanta Falcons owner Arthur Blank should enable him or give him tough love. It's not even about whether ... Nike should be launching another designer shoe with his name on it.

All of those are minor distractions from ...:

How did someone like Michael Vick ever come to exist?

Are we really ready to have that conversation? Do we dare explore how a young man of such unique athletic gifts and such obvious on-field marketing appeal was allowed to turn into just another unfortunate mug shot and potential ruined life? How did that remarkable athlete get a $100 million contract with the Falcons, become Nike's poster boy, rake in endorsements ..., then find himself on the verge of blowing it all because of an incredible tale that seems to come straight out of some hardcore gangsta rap video?

... The ultimate symbols of black athletes in our society used to be men of substance and positive image. Men with social conscience and resolve such as Jackie Robinson, Curt Flood, Jim Brown, ... They carried a burden and deep-rooted responsibility to portray themselves with a sense of dignity, pride and purpose. Even ... rebels such as Muhammad Ali ... stood for something more meaningful than a multimillion-dollar shoe deal.

But somewhere between Jackie Robinson and Michael Vick, ... "Street cred" became the anthem of the modern black athlete, this misguided notion that the only way to appeal to the young demographic of the sneaker-buying public was to adopt the negative attitudes of the thug life popularized by black hip-hop/gangster rappers. ...

(Excerpt) Read more at stltoday.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: black; blackculture; character; dogfighting; hiphop; michaelvick; rap; rappers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-158 next last
To: dfwgator

The article dealt with more than just hip-hop...


41 posted on 07/23/2007 11:27:22 AM PDT by johnny7 ("But that one on the far left... he had crazy eyes")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer
If you wish to mount a jihad against those who have high-jacked the responsible black man (I would suggest Floyd Patterson above Jackie or Curt), then start taking on the gang-like head scarves the black NFL players STILL INSIST on wearing. What kind of role model is that.

The NBA players are hardly role models as well — the PGA donates more to charity than the NBA. The NBA just flaunts their community service — you don’t endless public service spots on the PGA, or baseball — compared to the NBA self-glorification.

Gangsta Rap doesn’t lead - it reflects what is already accepted, ie., the rotten culture that’s out there.

Bill Cosby is a lone (black) voice in the wilderness. Juan Williams likes to quote him, but in actuality gives Cosby lip service regarding his own behavior. He’s a shill for the community.

Why am I not surprised by the Michael Vick situation.

42 posted on 07/23/2007 11:28:57 AM PDT by detch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle
If dog fighting were actually a matter of personal taste and legal, I might just take you up on your offer. It’s not. I attended a cock fight when I was in Viet Nam and I didn’t find it nearly as exciting as combat. It lacked the pomp you allude to although I saw men urinate on the loser.
43 posted on 07/23/2007 11:33:50 AM PDT by Ben Mugged (Always cheat; always win. The only unfair fight is the one you lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: radiohead

It’s not just the black kids.


44 posted on 07/23/2007 11:33:59 AM PDT by dblshot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer

‘That’s not how I read it at all. But, now that you mention it, I can see how one might.’

Yep. Those defending this turd are pulling out all the stops, blaming everything under the sun for Vick’s sick, twisted view of whats ‘sporting’.

For the past couple of weeks its been done over at The Sporting News website, but its telling Vick’s defenders are becoming fewer and fewer with each passing day.

I’ve seen posters blaming ‘the breed’ ‘racism’ ‘bigotry’ etc etc etc.

This is just a smoother attempt in my opinion. And it too falls way way short.


45 posted on 07/23/2007 11:36:22 AM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ishabibble

You left out many of the black “comedians.”


46 posted on 07/23/2007 11:36:27 AM PDT by elephantlips
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: DOGEY

I long for the days of Barry Sanders and Walter Payton. Score a touchdown, hand the ball to the ref and get off the field. None of this “Look at how great I am” crap.


47 posted on 07/23/2007 11:44:35 AM PDT by Long Island Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer
You often hear that the White man is just tearing another successful Black man down. It sounds like the Black community should shoulder more of the blame than the perceived White devil.
48 posted on 07/23/2007 11:44:45 AM PDT by WesternPacific
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer

The author used ‘african-american’ only once in the article. Pretty amazing in its ownself.


49 posted on 07/23/2007 11:46:30 AM PDT by gcruse (Let's strike Iran while it's hot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Raymann

First, know that no one I know would call me an “animal rights” person of any sort. I believe God gave us dominion over the animal kingdom and, when it comes down to animals vs. people, I side with people.

Now, given what you wrote about cockfighting and “senseless entertainment” and there being no moral difference between that sort of thing and watching an “action flick,” I’m curious...

Do you believe there’s nothing morally wrong with people torturing animals (their own animals, of course)? In other words, should you and I be able to buy puppies or kittens or whatever and treat them any way we want, without any consequences whatsoever?


50 posted on 07/23/2007 11:51:54 AM PDT by newgeezer (Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer
Mike Vick and others like him are stars from the time they are 10 years old. These guys are gifted and get everything handed to them. No discipline because family wants a cut and their yes men friends want a cut and invited to the party.

Who is Mike Vicks dad? Anyone? Did Vick grow up with coaches who act like dads (but really, how far will you go when your whole team is centered around one player?)

51 posted on 07/23/2007 11:57:36 AM PDT by normy (Don't hit at all if it is honorably possible to avoid hitting; but never hit soft.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Raymann

I believe in American culture and history, there are two animals that we as Americans demand good treatment of and that is dogs and horses. I think its just part of our culture and heritage. Cats? Thats another story.


52 posted on 07/23/2007 12:01:03 PM PDT by normy (Don't hit at all if it is honorably possible to avoid hitting; but never hit soft.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged
I was in Thailand recently on business and took in a monkey chain mace fight. They are NOT to be missed!

Owl_Eagle

If what I just wrote made you sad or angry,
it was probably just a joke.

53 posted on 07/23/2007 12:02:38 PM PDT by End Times Sentinel (In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: dblshot
It’s not just the black kids.

I hear what you're saying, and lord knows the white kids have certainly adopted hip hop dress, but, at least around here, I don't hear white kids being 'loud and wrong' out in public, which is what I find most disturbing and annoying.

54 posted on 07/23/2007 12:03:09 PM PDT by radiohead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged

Who would believe that Jimmy Stewart would date Paris Hilton were they contemporaries?


55 posted on 07/23/2007 12:03:11 PM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: i_dont_chat

I could have sworn that Will Rogers once said, “Once a man’s been a politician, he’s no longer fit for honest work,” but I can’t absolutely verify it.


56 posted on 07/23/2007 12:05:00 PM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer

Hip hop culture is just a symptom, it’s not the disease. The real problem here is a society that refuses to police itself. It celebrates reprobate and villifies the truly good. We are no longer allowed to judge and condemn the errant. It’s not their fault. They’re just a product of a fatherless home, racism, homophobia, islamaphobia, depression, anxiety, ADD, ADHD, poverty, inattentive mother, overbearing mother, too much TV violence, too many video games, cigarettes, trans-fats, lead paint, Alar poisoning, global warming, clergy abuse, bad schools, open borders or George Bush. Name a discretion, they’ve got an excuse. No one is accountable; no one deserves reproach. Walk into any shopping mall in any city in America and you are assaulted with language once reserved for the lowliest of sailors. And it’s coming from all ages and colors and no one even bats an eye. Hip hop is only a problem because we tolerate it, just like the potty mouths at the mall. Michael Vick is not a victim of hip hop; he’s just another example of turinng a blind eye to a problem, He was low-rent before he became a star, and continued to be low-rent after. Music and culture had nothing to do with his problem. He made a decision and no one called him on it; agents, managers, owners, teammates, or the press. Now he is paying a price in the legal system. How long before we hear what his excuse is? Who will be the first to jump to his defense.


57 posted on 07/23/2007 12:05:45 PM PDT by danno3150
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer
Want to stop this then cut off the money supply. Boycott the NFL, NBA, etc. I haven't watched the NBA for about 20 years and have added the National Felon's League a few years back.
58 posted on 07/23/2007 12:05:54 PM PDT by SgtSki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radiohead

Thank you for being part of the FR forum and giving your perspective. We need it.


59 posted on 07/23/2007 12:07:36 PM PDT by DeweyCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer
The ultimate symbols of black athletes in our society used to be men of substance and positive image. Men with social conscience and resolve such as Jackie Robinson, Curt Flood, Jim Brown, ..

Gale Sayers, Walter Payton, Willie Stargell...

60 posted on 07/23/2007 12:09:26 PM PDT by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-158 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson