Posted on 07/13/2007 9:51:52 AM PDT by PolishProud
What's with Laura Ingraham? This morning Peggy Noonan wrote an op ed which included the following criticism of President Bush:
"Every major domestic initiative of his second term has been ill thought through and ended in failure. His Iraq leadership has failed. His standing is lower than any previous president's since polling began.",
Laura loved Noonan's op ed. Go gal, kick him when he's down.
Ingraham is taking herself too seriously. Yesterday she was aghast over security chief Chertoff's "gut feeling." I don't know why. I would appreciate any source regarding security even Chertoff's gut. She also found Chertoff less than handsome. What a cheap shot.
Ingraham lost me when she went over to the dark side on the Foley scandal. She thought Hastert should have resigned for not protecting male pages from gay congressmen.
Bill Kristol,yesterday on her show, suggested that now is the time that talk show hosts should support the president. His comment went right over her head.
Okay, good to know where you stand.
Obviously I mean prosperity.
But you knew that, right?
Let's see, great on defense, great on the economy and great appointments to the USSC --terrible president--gosh, you're hard to please.
no difference. Just responding in kind.
LOL, she complains about the non-support, while agitating more non-support.
Good grief.
Talking to yourself again?
;-)
Lets see...Chertoff has gut feeling that somehow more terrorists are going to come into our country and attack us again....how would they get in?....OUR BORDERS ARE WIDE OPEN THE LAWS ARE ALREADY THERE AND THE ADMINISTRATION CALLS ANYONE WHO WANTS THE FEDS TO DO THEIR JOB A RACIST!...so Laura Ingraham should just bite her tongue and say the President is doing a great job! BUSH IS A GLOBALIST! He couldn’t care less about US Sovereignty! IF you are fighting a war and trying to stop attacks on your soil the FIRST thing you do is SEAL THE BORDER! National Security is directly related to this. Didn’t you ever wonder why all the steps that were taken ended up being imposed on people travelling within THIS country rather than focusing on people crossing the BORDER?!? She is conservative, BUSH is NOT.
Ravenstar
Politics aside, Noonan is a damned good writer. One of my majors was English.
He does?
I've never seen it articulated.
"It's what's best for America" is not a rational statement. it sounds more like a -- bumper sticker.
False.
The current administration did not call her or anyone racist. This is a lie that is circulating widely. You've bought into it.
Yeah, that Reagan exit strategy from Lebanon sure worked.
LOL. Actually, I mean Bill “I’m a limp-wristed weenie who wouldn’t know how to make a fist even if you gave me written instructions” Kristol
The fact is, Bush is the one that is semi-retarded. He is incompetent and unable to sell his vision - on ANYTHING. Unconvincing, insincere, disrespectful, elitist, smug, unprincipled, etc.
So, a quick recap: CONSERVATIVES - BUSH DOES NOT LIKE YOU, HE DOESN'T AGREE WITH YOU, HE THINKS YOU ARE STUPID. DEAL WITH IT.
With all the locks known to man on our borders how hard do you think it is to get phony documentation? Terrorists are NOT going to be stopped by an immigration check on the border. Have you been to an airport lately? The security lines are endless and the people checking papers wouldn’t know a fraudulent document if it had FRAUD stamped on it!
I completely agree with your sense of the situation over there.
I admit that I reluctantly supported the war, believing that the president and his team not only knew about the WMDs but had thought it all through to a successful end-game. My bad.
I should have trusted my instinct that it would devolve into an insurgency which no modern nation can win against third-world fanatics. Not us in Viet Nam or the Russians in Afghanistan or, especially, the French in Algeria.
That being said, I think it will be a horrendous disaster for us to simply face defeat and come home. But public support is in freefall and we will be coming home and soon. Our departure from Viet Nam cost a lot of Asian lives but was relatively painless (except psychologically) for us. This defeat will not be painless for us. It probably portends the arrival of as Islamic superstate with a deathgrip on ME oil supplies and nuclear weapons, or else, a major ME war with Israel using nukes to attempt to thwart the previous scenario and its own annihilation.
I have no good ideas. Our president has far too little credibility to lead us in such difficult times.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.