Posted on 06/18/2007 8:11:00 PM PDT by monomaniac
Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- More than any other candidate, Mitt Romney has received considerable scrutiny on the issue of abortion as a result of his change of position on the issue just a few years ago. Now the GOP presidential candidate is facing questions that he flip-flopped on the issue of embryonic stem cell research.
The charges come even though it was that contentious scientific issue that led him to adopt a pro-life position on abortion.
The question is about whether or not Romney agrees with a federal bill that forces taxpayers to fund embryonic stem cell research involving the destruction of human embryos that are so-called leftovers from fertility clinics.
It's an important one because President Bush has single-handedly protected Americans from funding the grisly research with a veto of one funding bill and an expected veto of a second this week. Congress has been unable to override him.
In 2005, then-Governor Romney indicated he supported the embryonic funding measure, according to a New York Times report.
“The United States House of Representatives voted for a bill that was identical to what I proposed,” Romney said. “They voted to provide for surplus embryos from in vitro fertilization processes being used for research and experimentation. That's what I said I support.”
Romney made a distinction in his position during the first Republican presidential debate last month, making it appear he supports keeping embryonic stem cell research legal but won't subject taxpayers to funding it.
He said he would be "happy" to allow embryonic stem cell research using "leftover" human embryos and then qualified his statement.
“I shouldn't say happy. It’s fine for that to be allowed, to be legal. I won't use our government funds for that," he explained.
Peter Flaherty, Romney's deputy campaign manager and his bioethics advisor during his tenure as governor, told the New York Times that Romney is solidly against embryonic stem cell research funding using public money.
“From the moment we sat down as an administration to formulate a policy on stem cell research, the governor has never been a proponent of expanded federal funding or state funding for embryonic stem cell research,” he said.
“Governor Romney is a strong advocate for federal funding for alternative methods to get pluripotent stem cells, such as altered nuclear transfer and direct reprogramming," Flaherty added.
But Matthew David, a spokesman for John McCain, doesn't buy it.
“It shouldn't surprise any Republican primary voters that Mitt Romney has changed his position on federal funding of stem cells, just like he did on ... abortion," David told the newspaper.
Ironically, McCain has upset pro-life advocates by repeatedly voting to fund embryonic stem cell research.
Which way are they not waffling now?
When Romney wavered about federal funding for stem cell research - Hunter was certain about his opinion and wanted to share it with Mrs. Reagan.
***After the 1st debate: http://www.americandaily.com/article/18685
Oh no . Not again. I am shocked. Is it me or is there a pattern developing ?
Until _after_ the primaries.
When did the government get in the healthcare business anyway?
Don’t really know about Romney, but heard his wife (in an interview with Larry King) give one of the best answers I’ve ever heard any one give, for the reasons why she’s against embryonic stem cell research (and she was being asked in the context of a person with a disease that supposedly might be helped by stem cell therapy...she has MS.)
I think it was in the LBJ days.
Bye, bye Mitt! You and McLib just keep dukeing it out against each other! As near as I can figure there must be a REALLY BIG prize for third place in this contest and both are going all out to get it!
Doesn’t much matter what you say anymore....your enemies will find a way to use it against you.
It is entirely possible for someone to change their convictions for reasons that are not cynical in nature.
Romney’s problem is that his road to Damascus moment came about the time he decided he wanted to be President running on the Republican ticket.
Maybe it’s genuine. Maybe it’s just unfortunate coincidence. Forty years from now if I was wrong I’ll apologize. Right now I’ve learned better then to believe these stunning conversions.
That doesn’t mean someone with a 20 year pro-Life record is necessarily trustworthy either. A lot of people know they are going into politics and plot their every move. no different then high achievers that set their sights on harvard or yale. They may or may not like all activities they involve themselves with to include on the resume. It doesn’t matter, it’s all a means to an end.
I’d still rather have the 20 record then the 3 year record.
BTW, Dowd, done any polling for you guy lately? If you have I suppose it’s about as credible as your amnesty polls...
He said he would be "happy" to allow embryonic stem cell research using "leftover" human embryos and then qualified his statement.
“I shouldn't say happy. It’s fine for that to be allowed, to be legal. I won't use our government funds for that," he explained."
It appears he has flipped, flopped, and flippity flopped.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
