Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why I believe in Creation
Worlnetdaily ^ | 12/17/2004 | joe farah

Posted on 06/17/2007 6:54:37 PM PDT by Rodney King

Why I believe in Creation Posted: December 17, 2004 1:00 a.m. Eastern

I was stunned the other day when I asked evolution-believing listeners to my nationally syndicated radio show to call in and tell me why they believed.

"Just give me one reason why you accept the theory," I said. "Just give me the strongest argument. You don't have to give me mountains of evidence. Just tell me why I should accept it."

Not one evolutionist called in.

Meanwhile, the phone banks lit up with dozens of evolution skeptics.

Go figure. For more than 40 years, evolution has been taught as fact in government schools to generations of children, yet there is still widespread skepticism, if not cynicism, about the theory across the country.

But, because of political correctness and the fear of ostracism, most people are afraid to admit what they believe about our origins. That's why I wrote my last column – "I believe in Creation."

The reaction to it has been unprecedented. While I expected mostly negative fallout, most letters have been quite positive.

So, I decided to take this issue a step further. Since the evolutionists don't want to tell me why they believe in their theory, I figured I would explain why I believe in mine.

The primary reason I believe, of course, is because the Bible tells me so. That's good enough for me, because I haven't found the Bible to be wrong about anything else.

But what about the worldly evidence?

The evolutionists insist the dinosaurs lived millions and millions of years ago and became extinct long before man walked the planet.

I don't believe that for a minute. I don't believe there is a shred of scientific evidence to suggest it. I am 100 percent certain man and dinosaurs walked the earth at the same time. In fact, I'm not at all sure dinosaurs are even extinct!

Think of all the world's legends about dragons. Look at those images. What were those folks seeing? They were clearly seeing dinosaurs. You can see them etched in cave drawings. You can see them in ancient literature. You can see them described in the Bible. You can see them in virtually every culture in every corner of the world.

Did the human race have a collective common nightmare? Or did these people actually see dragons? I believe they saw dragons – what we now call dinosaurs.

Furthermore, many of the dinosaur fossils discovered in various parts of the world were found right along human footprints and remains. How did that happen?

And what about the not-so-unusual sightings of contemporary sea monsters? Some of them have actually been captured.

There are also countless contemporary sightings of what appear to be pterodactyls in Asia and Africa.

You know what I think? I think we've been sold a bill of goods about the dinosaurs. I don't believe they died off millions and millions of years ago. In fact, I'm not at all convinced they've died off completely.

Evolutionists have put the cart before the horse. They start out with a theory, then ignore all the facts that contradict the theory. Any observation that might call into question their assumptions is discounted, ridiculed and covered up. That's not science.

How could all the thousands of historical records of dragons and behemoths throughout mankind's time on earth be ignored? Let's admit it. At least some of these observations and records indicate dinosaurs were walking the earth fairly recently – if not still walking it today.

If I'm right about that – which I am – then the whole evolutionary house of cards comes tumbling down.

This is the evidence about which the evolutionists dare not speak.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: barney; betty; creationism; crevo; dino; dlrcravescock; evolution; farah; farahisafag; fred; fsmdidit; nutjob; trydarwincentral; wilma; wnd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 701-716 next last
To: sentis1
It was never meant to be taken literally.

And that is stated where? Revelation 22:18-19 says, "I warn everyone who hears the prophetic words in this book: if anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues described in this book, and if anyone takes away from the words in this prophetic book, God will take away his share in the tree of life and in the holy city described in this book."

461 posted on 06/21/2007 12:21:28 AM PDT by taxesareforever (Never forget Matt Maupin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman
Can you see no scientific evidence that supports evolution?

I can see no scientific evidence that supports evolution. The reason being is that there isn't any.

462 posted on 06/21/2007 12:28:09 AM PDT by taxesareforever (Never forget Matt Maupin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: RFC_Gal
What is really sad is that you believe that evolution is anti-God

What is really sad is that you believe it isn't.

463 posted on 06/21/2007 12:29:38 AM PDT by taxesareforever (Never forget Matt Maupin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
I mean, you don't think that various forms of geology, carbon dating, etc. at least hint at the possibility that the world is older than the new earth creationists preach?

Nope. How's that for being positive.

464 posted on 06/21/2007 12:31:23 AM PDT by taxesareforever (Never forget Matt Maupin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger
Most times a radio show discusses the issue, the people who call up on either side are uninformed and emotional. That’s on BOTH sides. I can’t complain...it makes me look good when I call up. ;-)

Well, it was classic when Sean Hannity hung up on you.

465 posted on 06/21/2007 2:27:05 AM PDT by AtomicBuffaloWings (Still not hot enough, A few of my taste buds are still alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 397 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner

You have the wrong poster here.

I am not a young earth guy.


466 posted on 06/21/2007 4:46:03 AM PDT by DreamsofPolycarp (Americans used to roar like lions for liberty. Now they bleat like sheep for security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 438 | View Replies]

To: DreamsofPolycarp
You have the wrong poster here. I am not a young earth guy.

It's really hard to keep track sometimes, since we see on these threads (and on the national stage) people who are avowed young earth creationists, allying themselves with Michael Behe, who accepts an old earth and common descent.

It's really odd to see creationists arguing for intelligent design.

467 posted on 06/21/2007 4:55:03 AM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 466 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger
Suggestions pertaining to whether or not dinosaurs may still be alive. Look up "mokele mbembe," "pterosaur" and "emela-ntouka" on google and CreationWiki. There are some interesting stories coming out of remote regions of the Congo, which some creationists are currently pursuing.

I'm perfectly willing to believe that a dinosaur is some form or another still exists, but, the existence of one would not validate the claim that T-Rex and Stegasuarus were around when Jesus was.

468 posted on 06/21/2007 5:27:30 AM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 396 | View Replies]

Comment #469 Removed by Moderator

Comment #470 Removed by Moderator

To: DaveLoneRanger
Wait — if we found a living dinosaur in the Congo basin, this still wouldn’t prove to you that dinosaurs lived at the same time Jesus did? What, did they all die out and stay dead until some miraculous re-evolution some centuries later? Perhaps you mean that dinosaurs didn’t exist around the same region as Christ. That would make more sense.

It would prove that a dinosaur lived today, and, would prove that "dinosaurs" lived at the same time as jesus. That would not prove that the "era of the dinosaurs" when the earth was filled with millions of the big guys didn't happen 100 million years ago,(or whatever the commonly accepted date is).

471 posted on 06/21/2007 6:34:42 AM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 470 | View Replies]

Comment #472 Removed by Moderator

To: DreamsofPolycarp
You have the wrong poster here.

I am not a young earth guy.

Sorry.

473 posted on 06/21/2007 6:49:02 AM PDT by GunRunner (Come on Fred, how long are you going to wait?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 466 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger

The link you provided contains theories that date the Earth as much older than 6,000 years. That’s all I was asking, so I assume you don’t hold the strict creationist view that the Earth was constructed in 6 days 6,000 years ago.


474 posted on 06/21/2007 6:53:10 AM PDT by GunRunner (Come on Fred, how long are you going to wait?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 455 | View Replies]

Comment #475 Removed by Moderator

To: knarf
Not mine ... I believe my faith in God supercedes your faith in scientists and computer models

So nothing in science can sway you from of your strict literalist view of the Bible.

You're certainly entitled to your belief. Since you admit that no amount of scientific evidence would make you revisit your interpretation of the Bible, I would no sooner try and talk you out of your belief than I would a Hindu who believes in reincarnation.

476 posted on 06/21/2007 6:59:52 AM PDT by GunRunner (Come on Fred, how long are you going to wait?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 457 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger

I was only directing my point to those who hold the literal view of Genesis as chronicling 6,000 year old Earth. I mistook you and Dreamsofpolycarp as advocates of this belief.


477 posted on 06/21/2007 7:03:36 AM PDT by GunRunner (Come on Fred, how long are you going to wait?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 475 | View Replies]

To: taxesareforever

Since the GC was formed by a land upheaval that was carved back down by the Colorado river, I’m afraid the flood doesn’t apply.


478 posted on 06/21/2007 7:04:05 AM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 460 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King

Farah, if you’re reading this, PLEASE stfu if you want us to win in 2008. Or at least read an actual biology textbook instead of some wacko cryptozoology tract.


479 posted on 06/21/2007 7:41:33 AM PDT by RightWingAtheist (Creationism is to conservatism what Howard Dean is to liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger
Hey Dave!
480 posted on 06/21/2007 7:43:28 AM PDT by RightWingAtheist (Creationism is to conservatism what Howard Dean is to liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 409 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 701-716 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson