Posted on 06/15/2007 6:52:12 AM PDT by Brytani
I didn't see anything posted on this live testimony. Who's watching it and what are your thoughts?
Well there goes that case.
I really dont get this, they found sperm, it just wasn’t the Lacross players
Not only that but he’s roundabout admitting she had NO credibility, had completely changed her statement, or made statements based on media reports yet he continued with this scam prosecution.
This man should be in prison for this....
Nifong is now hedging and can’t say what, if anything (other than a penis), she claimed she was penetrated with.
Yet, he still retains the sexual assault charges.
Nifong was about to answer what credible evidence was there of penetration of ANY object? Why drop rape charges and keep sexual assault charges?
Damn, dying to know what his rationalization for believing her at this point was.
And thats the only reason they’re still sucking air!
she wasn’t credible the night she was found passed out drunk in a car.
This case has set back the case of women who are honesty raped 1,000 years.
All women should want to take this lying fraud of a “victim” and this prosecutor outside for tar and feathering.
Nancy Grace was on yesterday. She said things that made it evident that she too had believed that the rape took place. I never did hear anything like "I regret my comments for the past months" nor did anyone else ask her "Aren't you going to apologize?" like was asked of President Bush over and over for his non-lie.
The labs that tested the DNA evidence found sperm from “multiple” sources in her vagina, anus, and panties.
NONE matched any of the lacrosse players.
Go to WRAL.com - good coverage, good picture, good sound and no breaks.
He basically sidestepped the question and in a roundabout way admitted she had no credibility yet he continued.
He knew he had a good chance at convictions because of the income, talent, education, and race disparity of his bogus victim and the men he intended to frame.
That is why I dont understand the line of questioning. If semen was not in her from these guys but there was semen from so many other men how can they take her accusations seriously.
No sane person could! Unless he was running for election (guess that really is covered under my first statement, isn’t it)?
I love this question, Why didn’t you talk with the lawyers of the defendents.
Thanks! I’ll try that, stunning that everyone is treating this as a simple ethical lapse.
It is criminal.
However he left a big-time college with a program near the top (Duke was the runner-up in this year's NCAA Division 1 championship even after all this and probably a hit on recruiting) for a college that is an unknown in the lacrosse world. I hope he got a huge settlement and have been glad to see him on interviews when he says that he did not leave Duke voluntarily.
It’s uninterrupted on http://www.wral.com/
Someone should have clued Nifong that you can con a jury, but its harder (and much more dangerous) to try to con a Judge, unless you’re a lot better at it than Nifong apparently is.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.