To: mware
Does CTV plan breaks at EXACTLY the crucial times?
Nifong was about to answer what credible evidence was there of penetration of ANY object? Why drop rape charges and keep sexual assault charges?
Damn, dying to know what his rationalization for believing her at this point was.
To: roses of sharon
Go to WRAL.com - good coverage, good picture, good sound and no breaks.
He basically sidestepped the question and in a roundabout way admitted she had no credibility yet he continued.
291 posted on
06/15/2007 12:35:15 PM PDT by
Brytani
(Keeper of the FR Loofah, Bath-cap and Rubber Duckie)
To: roses of sharon
Damn, dying to know what his rationalization for believing her at this point was.
Direct streams a so much better because they don't have interruptions.
==
Nifong said that she said she could not say that a penis was the object inserted (although she originally claimed rape). Therefore, without the penis insertion, the rape claim 'goes away'.
Nifong says some other object was inserted, but he can't recall what that object might have been.
But without that 'insertion', there is no sexual assault, so he has to keep the idea of an object being using.
293 posted on
06/15/2007 12:35:45 PM PDT by
TomGuy
To: roses of sharon
299 posted on
06/15/2007 12:39:54 PM PDT by
Sue Perkick
(And I hope that what I’ve done here today doesn’t force you to have a negative opinion of me….)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson