Posted on 06/11/2007 2:09:09 PM PDT by Alter Kaker
PRINCETON, NJ -- The majority of Republicans in the United States do not believe the theory of evolution is true and do not believe that humans evolved over millions of years from less advanced forms of life. This suggests that when three Republican presidential candidates at a May debate stated they did not believe in evolution, they were generally in sync with the bulk of the rank-and-file Republicans whose nomination they are seeking to obtain.
Independents and Democrats are more likely than Republicans to believe in the theory of evolution. But even among non-Republicans there appears to be a significant minority who doubt that evolution adequately explains where humans came from.
The data from several recent Gallup studies suggest that Americans' religious behavior is highly correlated with beliefs about evolution. Those who attend church frequently are much less likely to believe in evolution than are those who seldom or never attend. That Republicans tend to be frequent churchgoers helps explain their doubts about evolution.
The data indicate some seeming confusion on the part of Americans on this issue. About a quarter of Americans say they believe both in evolution's explanation that humans evolved over millions of years and in the creationist explanation that humans were created as is about 10,000 years ago.
Broad Patterns of Belief in Evolution
The theory of evolution as an explanation for the origin and development of life has been controversial for centuries, and, in particular, since the 1859 publication of Charles Darwin's famous The Origin of Species. Although many scientists accept evolution as the best theoretical explanation for diversity in forms of life on Earth, the issue of its validity has risen again as an important issue in the current 2008 presidential campaign. Two recent Republican debates have included questions to the candidates about evolution. Three candidates -- Sam Brownback, Mike Huckabee, and Tom Tancredo -- indicated in response to a question during the May 3 debate that they did not believe in the theory of evolution, although they have attempted to clarify their positions in the weeks since.
Several recent Gallup Polls conducted in May and June indicate that a significant number of Americans have doubts about the theory of evolution.
One such question was included in a May Gallup Panel survey:
Now thinking about how human beings came to exist on Earth, do you, personally, believe in evolution, or not?
| ||||
Yes, believe |
No, do |
No |
||
2007 May 21-24 |
|
49 |
48 |
2 |
It is important to note that this question included a specific reference to "thinking about how human beings came to exist on Earth . . ." that oriented the respondents toward an explicit consideration of the implication of evolution for man's origin. Results may have been different without this introductory phrase.
With that said, Americans' responses to this question are essentially split down the middle. About half say they do believe in evolution and about half say they do not.
A second question included in a June 1-3 USA Today/Gallup poll asked about evolution side by side with a similar question about creationism:
Next, we'd like to ask about your views on two different explanations for the origin and development of life on earth. Do you think -- [ITEMS ROTATED] -- is -- [ROTATED: definitely true, probably true, probably false, (or) definitely false]?
A. Evolution, that is, the idea that human beings developed over millions of years from less advanced forms of life
| ||||||||
Definite- |
Probably |
Probably |
Definite- |
No |
|
Total |
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
2007 Jun 1-3 |
|
18% |
35 |
16 |
28 |
3 |
53 |
44 |
B. Creationism, that is, the idea that God created human beings pretty much in their present form at one time within the last 10,000 years
| ||||||||
Definite- |
Probably |
Probably |
Definite- |
No |
|
Total |
Total |
|
2007 Jun 1-3 |
|
39% |
27 |
16 |
15 |
3 |
66 |
31 |
These results are similar to those from the question asked in May. A little more than half of Americans say evolution -- as defined in this question wording -- is definitely or probably true. Forty-four percent say that it is probably or definitely false.
In contrast, even more Americans, two-thirds, say the theory of creationism is definitely or probably true.
A separate Gallup Poll trend question -- also asked in May -- gave Americans three choices about human beings' origins. Responses to this question found that 43% of Americans choose the alternative closest to the creationist perspective, that "God created human beings pretty much in their present form at one time within the last 10,000 years or so." A substantial 38% say human beings evolved, but with God guiding the process. Another 14% favored an interpretation of evolution arguing that God had no part in the process, leaving a total of 52% who say humans evolved with or without God's direction.
Which of the following statements comes closest to your views on the origin and development of human beings -- [ROTATE 1-3/3-1: 1) Human beings have developed over millions of years from less advanced forms of life, but God guided this process, 2) Human beings have developed over millions of years from less advanced forms of life, but God had no part in this process, 3) God created human beings pretty much in their present form at one time within the last 10,000 years or so]?
| |||||
Man developed, |
Man developed, |
God created |
Other/ |
||
|
|||||
% |
% |
% |
% |
||
2007 May 10-13 |
38 |
14 |
|
43 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 May 8-11 |
36 |
13 |
|
46 |
5 |
2004 Nov 7-10 |
38 |
13 |
45 |
4 |
|
2001 Feb 19-21 |
|
37 |
12 |
45 |
5 |
1999 Aug 24-26 |
40 |
9 |
47 |
|
4 |
1997 Nov 6-9 |
39 |
10 |
44 |
7 |
|
1993 Jun 23-26 |
35 |
|
11 |
47 |
7 |
|
38 |
9 |
44 |
9 |
To summarize the results of these three questions about evolution and human origins:
It might seem contradictory to believe that humans were created in their present form at one time within the past 10,000 years and at the same time believe that humans developed over millions of years from less advanced forms of life. But, based on an analysis of the two side-by-side questions asked this month about evolution and creationism, it appears that a substantial number of Americans hold these conflicting views.
| ||||||
View of Evolution and View of Creationism |
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Probably |
Probably |
Definitely |
|||
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
||
View of Evolution |
Definitely true |
3 |
1 |
|
2 |
11 |
Probably true |
5 |
14 |
12 |
3 |
||
|
Probably false |
6 |
8 |
1 |
1 |
|
Definitely false |
24 |
|
3 |
* |
1 |
|
* Less than 0.5% |
These results show that:
Without further research, it's not possible to determine the exact thinking process of those who agreed that both the theory of evolution and creationism are true. It may be, however, that some respondents were seeking a way to express their views that evolution may have been initiated by or guided by God, and told the interviewer that they agreed with both evolution and creationism in an effort to express this more complex attitude.
Importance of Religion
It is important to remember that all three questions in this analysis included wording that explicitly focused the respondents on the origin of human beings.
This wording may have made Americans think about the implications of the theory of evolution in terms of humans being special creatures as reflected in religious teachings and in particular in the Judeo-Christian story of human origins as related in the book of Genesis. USA Today recently quoted Christian conservative and former presidential candidate Gary Bauer as saying: "Most of us don't think that we're just apes with trousers."
Thus, it is not surprising to find that many of those who do not believe in the theory of evolution justify that belief with explicitly religious explanations:
(Asked of those who do not believe in evolution) What is the most important reason why you would say you do not believe in evolution? [OPEN-ENDED]
| ||
|
2007 May 21-24 |
|
% |
||
I believe in Jesus Christ |
19 |
|
I believe in the almighty God, creator of Heaven and Earth |
|
16 |
Due to my religion and faith |
16 |
|
Not enough scientific evidence to prove otherwise |
14 |
|
I believe in what I read in the Bible |
12 |
|
|
||
I'm a Christian |
9 |
|
I don't believe humans come from beasts/monkeys |
3 |
|
|
||
Other |
5 |
|
|
||
No reason in particular |
2 |
|
No opinion |
3 |
The majority of these responses are clearly religious in nature. It is fascinating to note that some Americans simply justified their objection to evolution by statements of general faith and belief. Although the New Testament does not include many explicit references to the origin of humans in the words of Jesus, 19% of Americans state that they do not believe in evolution because they believe in Jesus Christ. Other religious justifications focus on statements of belief in God, general faith concerns, references to the Bible, and the statement that "I'm a Christian." A relatively small number of this group justify their disbelief of evolution by saying more specifically that they do not believe that there is enough scientific evidence to prove the theory and/or that they simply do not believe that humans come from beasts or monkeys.
The graph shows the relationship between church attendance and response to the straightforward question of belief in evolution.
The group of Americans who attend church weekly -- about 40% in this sample -- are strongly likely to reject the theory of evolution. The group of Americans who attend church seldom or never -- also about 40% -- have the mirror image opinion and are strongly likely to accept the theory of evolution.
Republicans Most Likely to Reject Evolution
As noted previously, belief in evolution has been injected into the political debate already this year, with much attention given to the fact three Republican presidential candidates answered a debate question by saying that they did not believe in evolution.
It appears that these candidates are, in some ways, "preaching to the choir" in terms of addressing their own party's constituents -- the group that matters when it comes to the GOP primaries. Republicans are much more likely to be religious and attend church than independents or Democrats in general. Therefore, it comes as no great surprise to find that Republicans are also significantly more likely not to believe in evolution than are independents and Democrats.
Bottom Line
The data in this analysis were measured in the context of questions about the origin and development of human beings. It is apparent that many Americans simply do not like the idea that humans evolved from lower forms of life. This appears to be substantially based on a belief in the story of creation as outlined in the Bible -- that God created humans in a process that, taking the Bible literally, occurred about 10,000 years ago.
Americans who say they do not believe in the theory of evolution are highly likely to justify this belief by reference to religion, Jesus Christ, or the Bible. Furthermore, there is a strong correlation between high levels of personal religiosity and doubts about evolution.
Being religious in America today is strongly related to partisanship, with more religious Americans in general much more likely to be Republicans than to be independents or Democrats. This relationship helps explain the finding that Republicans are significantly more likely than independents or Democrats to say they do not believe in evolution. When three Republican presidential candidates said in a May debate that they did not believe in evolution, the current analysis suggests that many Republicans across the country no doubt agreed.
Survey Methods
These results are based on telephone interviews with a randomly selected national sample of 1,007 adults, aged 18 and older, conducted June 1-3, 2007. For results based on this sample, one can say with 95% confidence that the maximum error attributable to sampling and other random effects is ±3 percentage points.
For results based on the sample of 203 Catholics, the maximum margin of sampling error is ±8 percentage points.
For results based on the sample of 804 non-Catholics, the maximum margin of sampling error is ±4 percentage points.
In addition to sampling error, question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of public opinion polls.
“It seems as if many ex-Freepers who are genuine scientists and those who support immigration reform have both been driven from FR.
I suppose it’s another demonstration that all civilizations eventually fall to the hands of unthinking superstitious mobs. America truly is in decline.”
CRY ME A RIVER...puuuhlease.....
My real name is Michael P...you are why I couldn’t get that screen name.
I have two retired race hounds as pets.
Less than 1/3 of americans believe that evolution is fact. To win elections, if this issue is important, to understand that evolution is fantasy is a decided advantage.
This article will be useful to understand why Republicans are MORE MAINSTREAM in this issue than we give them credit for :
I mean the poll, recently reported by USA Today, that shows that 66% of Americans think that the statement, Creationism, that is, the idea that God created human beings pretty much in their present form at one time within the last 10,000 years is definitely or probably true.
This is wonderful poll question for people who believe that Uncle Sams alter ego is Santa Claus. I wonder how much public money Darwin lobbies in high science will screw out of US taxpayers in order to try to change their minds - with about as much success as they have had in the past - zilch.
As I pointed out in By Design or by Chance?, the human history that most people would recognize is certainly less than 10,000 years old. Ur of the Chaldees, the city Abraham left in order to wander in the desert, is about 6500 years old. The Great Pyramid is only about 4500 years old. Apart from wordless outliers like the Willendorf Venus and the Cave of Lascaux, we have only the empty speculations of evolutionary psychology for the vast stretches of time before then. So real history is relatively recent.
And that is a significant fact. Something happened to human beings relatively recently (less than ten thousand years ago) that did not happen to lemurs, toads, or ants. And it is a mark of the enormously heavy investment that the American materialist elite has made in materialism that it is at such pains to try to convince everyone else of its peculiar delusion that nothing really happened.
To see what is at stake here, consider the following three propositions:
1. Five million years ago, your ancestors were lemur-like creatures screaming in the trees.
2. You are about 60% water.
3. Your DNA is 98% identical to that of a chimpanzee.
All sensible humans who are not materialists will respond to any one of these propositions, So?
Now, any one of them may happen not to be true. For example, because I am a woman, I am more likely to be about 50% water (because fat binds less water than muscle does, and women store proportionately more fat).
But either way, half of me is the same stuff as Lake Ontario. But what does that mean? It means you can replicate that half by pouring yourself a glass of water. So thats the half you dont need to bother about.
Similarly, the fact that our ancestors may have screamed in the trees millions of years ago is actually of vastly less significance than the events of the last ten thousand years. Just as the similarities of our DNA with that of chimpanzees mainly tells you that most of what you need to know about a human being is not in the DNA.
The real reason that most Americans simply dont go along with elite opinion about the origin of human beings is that they are relatively freer than other peoples to dissent from their elite, and they know - as any sensible person who thinks about the matter must know - that the materialist view of human beings is nonsense. And they rightly reject everything connected with it.
Something did happen less than ten thousand years ago that forever separated us from Lake Ontario and from whatever screams in the trees. And I think the solid 66% on the poll question are trying to say that, even though they are forced to fund the propagandists of the elite through their taxes.
I agree with you. I believe that evolution is the mechanics of intelligent design just as Darwin believed. I also believe that bringing this debate into party politics is suicide for the Republican party.
Many Americans fear the growth of an American Theocracy and this silliness reinforces those fears.
Also, I have noticed that your tin horn only squeeks out this one note. What is it that is so existentially threatening to you about people who believe that your great X 20 grandpappy wasn't the monkey you know him to have been?
Question for you. About 97% of all the water on the planet is salt water. If it rained enough to flood the entire surface of the planet to a depth of tens of thousands of feet then all that salt water mixed with the fresh water and polluted it. So what did Noah drink once all the water receded?
Dude, majority of human beings alive today don’t believe this crap, as they don’t believe that there is no difference between men and women and that pederasty (what you politically corrected folks like to call ‘gaiety’) is perfectly normal, so there!
Some people (not me!) wish to think God created by evolution, that Genesis need not be taken literally (e.g. post #100), that macroevolution occurred with God’s guidance.
Good one.
Name one.
>>So, to paraphrase Doyle, when you rule out the impossible, whatever is left, no matter how improbable, must be true.<<
It is an equal error to rule something out when one doesn’t understand it. Time after time science has advanced and explained things that were thought to be beyond human comprehension.
They clearly are mutually exclusive, unlessyou want to disregard what creationism is all about.
Ok, I'll go along with that as long as those scientific classroom teachers and materials fully inform students evolution is only a theory developed by some in the scientific community.
No true there are many “credible” scientists whom dispute the theory of macroevolution: biologists and chemists on the issues of DNA and cellular formation (that it is 1 too complex, to shows intelligence), and other scientists even geologists whom recognize that there has been proof of species in fossils appears in rock that they shouldn’t according to the geologic clock. Don’tput out false information that these creation scientists don’t rely upon empirical evidence (its the same ad-hominim attack) that many darwinists rely upon rather than substantive Argument..!
You should change your name to godlessSteve_Seattle.
The poll questions presented them as mutually exclusive.
Which is idiotic.
I don't see why you expect it to, given that it doesn't even attempt to address this question.
Or life from non-life?
Same answer as above. The theory of evolution doesn't address the question of how life arrose. It only deals with the question of how life changes over time.
What is nonsense is the fairy tale that a single cell (which no one knows how it could come about), has 'evolved' into a human being.
Why is it nonsense? All human beings start their existence as single cells. That's true of you too.
And you can add any amount of zero's to the millions of years you want, it is utter nonsense.
Please go study some geology. It just doesn't work that way.
So, to paraphrase Doyle, when you rule out the impossible, whatever is left, no matter how improbable, must be true.
Okay, so what's your point?
Evolution is a fairy tale for adults who want to believe that they will not face their Creator at a Judgment seat (Rev.20)
It's only a fairy tale to those who willfully ignore the evidence.
BTW, you still haven't offered a single argument to back up your original statement:
Either God is impossible or Evolution is.
I'm waiting.
Oh, Gerald Ford how we need you so now!
Macroevolution is not synonymous with science--something a lot of Macroevolutionists still don't seem to get. (An apple is a fruit, but it isn't synonymous with fruit).
In this case, Macroevolution is pseudoscience. (A rock isn't fruit).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.