Posted on 04/21/2007 6:42:25 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
We've got some real challenges facing us. FR was established to fight against government corruption, overstepping, and abuse and to fight for a return to the limited constitutional government as envisioned and set forth by our founding fathers in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution and other founding documents.
One of the biggest cases of government corruption, overstepping and abuse that I know of is its disgraceful headlong slide into a socialist hell. Our founders never intended for abortion to be the law of the land. And they never intended the Supreme Court to be a legislative body. They never intended God or religion to be written out of public life. They never intended government to be used to deny God's existence or for government to be used to force sexual perversions onto our society or into our children's education curriculum. They never intend for government to disarm the people. They never intended for government to set up sanctuary cities for illegals. They never intended government to “rule” over the people and or to take their earnings or private property or to deprive them of their constitutional rights to free speech, free religion, private property, due process, etc. They never intended government to seize the private property of private citizens through draconian asset forfeiture laws or laws allowing government to take private property from lawful owners to give to developers. Or to seize wealth and redistribute it to others. Or to provide government forced health insurance or government forced retirement systems.
All of the above are examples of ever expanding socialism and tyranny brought to us by liberals/liberalism.
FR fights against the liberals/Democrats in all of these areas and always will. Now if liberalism infiltrates into the Republican party and Republicans start promoting all this socialist garbage, do you think that I or FR will suddenly stop fighting against it? Do you think I'm going to bow down and accept abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, global warming, illegal alien lawbreakers, gun control, asset forfeiture, socialism, tyranny, totalitarianism, etc, etc, etc, just so some fancy New York liberal lawyer can become president from the Republican party?
Do you really expect me to do that?
“So who do you think will “unite” the party?”
Yoko Giuliani.
Thanks for that clarification, Jim. ;^)
She probably wasn’t bluffing, but it clearly wasn’t a threat against a candidate, so no one is going to pay any attention to her concern. Seriously, does she think the media is going to run with that on the nightly news? Does she think the FBI is going to go after a site for a comment a poster that made that is CLEARLY not a threat?
PC LOAD LETTER!!! PC LOAD LETTER!!!!
Are you trying to refer to me? Sorry, I don’t swing that way.
Thanks!
Now that’s a good question. I wouldn’t believe it for a second. But you are asking me if SHE believed it.
I think an intelligent person wouldn’t believe it, but that’s not really fair. Maybe she truly believed it. I can’t say.
If she believed it, she still would have been saying that he was a liar and manipulator. So then the question is, do you deserve to be banned if you say bad things about a candidate that are obviously false but which you honestly believe to be true?
I can’t answer that, because if I was in charge she wouldn’t have been banned. But FO was banned after saying something he really thought was true but turned out to be false, because I suppose he SHOULD have known it was false.
So it is possible she got banned for saying something she thought was true.
Look, since I don’t know her, I can’t really say what she believed. So this is all speculative on my part. But I wanted to answer you as best I could.
“M. Thatcher just oppused from FR via FReepmail. Says she’s going to alert the FBI to your post #5606 above. She claims it’s a “threat to candidates.”
Good. Another fraudulent poster. All of you just opus and get the hell out of here. You fight for your liberal pols and we’ll fight for the conservatives. We’ll be smaller, leaner and better.
“And she’s going to discuss it with her boss and her powerful friends in the media.”
Laughing My Arse Off!!!!!!!!! “powerful friends in the media BWWAAAAAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
It’s nuts, absolutely nuts.
LOLOL
Whatever. I just called it nonsense. If she follows up on it, that is the price of doing business.
IMO, its much ado about nothing.
I think you might be headed to federal pound me in the a** prison.
Yeah, for a bit! dance isnt over til 9pm!! i just gotta watch the clock lol
They sure are! on more than one issue!!
The truth is, that, even with the most secure tenure of office, during good behavior, the danger is not, that the judges will be too firm in resisting public opinion, and in defence of private rights or public liberties; but, that they will be ready to yield themselves to the passions, and politics, and prejudices of the day.
Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution, 1833
He had a lot of foresight. I suspect, if we could talk to him today about things, he might have said, “See, didn’t I tell you?”
“Why do you even care what people are doing on another site?”
I’m going covert on their liberal rumps. Why? I just like observing social interactions. What is your goal on this site?
Is that where the zots go to trash FR?
LOL!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.