Will FR embrace socialism to make way for Rudy Giuliani as a Republican presidential candidate?

vanity | April 21, 2007 | Jim Robinson

[Jim Robinson]

We've got some real challenges facing us. FR was established to fight against government corruption, overstepping, and abuse and to fight for a return to the limited constitutional government as envisioned and set forth by our founding fathers in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution and other founding documents.

One of the biggest cases of government corruption, overstepping and abuse that I know of is its disgraceful headlong slide into a socialist hell. Our founders never intended for abortion to be the law of the land. And they never intended the Supreme Court to be a legislative body. They never intended God or religion to be written out of public life. They never intended government to be used to deny God's existence or for government to be used to force sexual perversions onto our society or into our children's education curriculum. They never intend for government to disarm the people. They never intended for government to set up sanctuary cities for illegals. They never intended government to “rule” over the people and or to take their earnings or private property or to deprive them of their constitutional rights to free speech, free religion, private property, due process, etc. They never intended government to seize the private property of private citizens through draconian asset forfeiture laws or laws allowing government to take private property from lawful owners to give to developers. Or to seize wealth and redistribute it to others. Or to provide government forced health insurance or government forced retirement systems.

All of the above are examples of ever expanding socialism and tyranny brought to us by liberals/liberalism.

FR fights against the liberals/Democrats in all of these areas and always will. Now if liberalism infiltrates into the Republican party and Republicans start promoting all this socialist garbage, do you think that I or FR will suddenly stop fighting against it? Do you think I'm going to bow down and accept abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, global warming, illegal alien lawbreakers, gun control, asset forfeiture, socialism, tyranny, totalitarianism, etc, etc, etc, just so some fancy New York liberal lawyer can become president from the Republican party?

Do you really expect me to do that?

[EternalVigilance]

And, so it starts.

I've made my views known throughout. This is nothing new.

[FreeReign]

Nailed it!

You nailed it

LOL! You two nailed each other.

[Iwo Jima]

I’m afraid your reading is, shall we say, incomplete.

[Iwo Jima]

Now, that’s a disgusting thought.

[EternalVigilance]

Well, there you go, guys. This is your big chance to climb right back on top. Make the most of it, and just remember that you’ve got the future of the country in your hands.

[mkjessup]

You would freak the majority of the people out ... they would turn on you and shut down the debate

Well I DID say it was only a daydream, eh? ;)

IMO .. the best why to get a women to understand there is actually a baby inside them ... is to show them a sonogram ... those things can show amazing details of their babies

I agree. I like the new Florida legislation requiring women to see a sonogram of their unborn child BEFORE they murder them, I'd like to think that will help save lives that are unable to save themselves.

[DCPatriot]

LOL! Homey don’t play that!

[Petronski]

You two nailed each other.

I have an unblemished thirty+ year record of staunch heterosexuality.

[stephenjohnbanker]

” broadcast footage of an actual abortion, perhaps even a partial birth abortion”

Drudge did that yeas ago, and immediately lost his tv show.

[TET1968]

“Pro-life conservatives didn’t elect Perot. He was a pro-abort. His wife sat on the Planned Barrenhood board.”

Believe me, I get it.
Thanks a load to all the “Pro- Life Conservatives” for handing the country over to Bill & Hillary Clinton ...appears there are some that want to do it again.

[Mo1]

can’t say I’m suprised

[DCPatriot]

nice try, EV....Homey don’t play THAT either!! ;^)

[EternalVigilance]

Again, prolifers didn’t support Perot. You’re mistaken.

[EternalVigilance]

I have no idea what you mean.

[DCPatriot]

You had to be there! ;^)

[FreeReign]

Since when is the common definition of "nailed"....?

Oh what's the use.

[Chena]

bookmark

[stephenjohnbanker]

Just curious, who are you rooting for?

[DCPatriot]

ROFL!!

I was going to post an "I'd Hit It' graphic...but I'm too lazy tonight.

Just kidding Petronski! ;^) Your thirty year record is safe!

[EternalVigilance]

Thanks a load to all the “Pro- Life Conservatives” for handing the country over to Bill & Hillary Clinton ...appears there are some that want to do it again.

The "Blame Conservatives-first" Republicans just don't give up.