Will FR embrace socialism to make way for Rudy Giuliani as a Republican presidential candidate?

vanity | April 21, 2007 | Jim Robinson

[Jim Robinson]

We've got some real challenges facing us. FR was established to fight against government corruption, overstepping, and abuse and to fight for a return to the limited constitutional government as envisioned and set forth by our founding fathers in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution and other founding documents.

One of the biggest cases of government corruption, overstepping and abuse that I know of is its disgraceful headlong slide into a socialist hell. Our founders never intended for abortion to be the law of the land. And they never intended the Supreme Court to be a legislative body. They never intended God or religion to be written out of public life. They never intended government to be used to deny God's existence or for government to be used to force sexual perversions onto our society or into our children's education curriculum. They never intend for government to disarm the people. They never intended for government to set up sanctuary cities for illegals. They never intended government to “rule” over the people and or to take their earnings or private property or to deprive them of their constitutional rights to free speech, free religion, private property, due process, etc. They never intended government to seize the private property of private citizens through draconian asset forfeiture laws or laws allowing government to take private property from lawful owners to give to developers. Or to seize wealth and redistribute it to others. Or to provide government forced health insurance or government forced retirement systems.

All of the above are examples of ever expanding socialism and tyranny brought to us by liberals/liberalism.

FR fights against the liberals/Democrats in all of these areas and always will. Now if liberalism infiltrates into the Republican party and Republicans start promoting all this socialist garbage, do you think that I or FR will suddenly stop fighting against it? Do you think I'm going to bow down and accept abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, global warming, illegal alien lawbreakers, gun control, asset forfeiture, socialism, tyranny, totalitarianism, etc, etc, etc, just so some fancy New York liberal lawyer can become president from the Republican party?

Do you really expect me to do that?

[ScreamingFist]

LMOA

[dmw]

“Looking for snide? The really gifted purveyors of snide have migrated to Wideawakes (the rest of us are rank amatuers). Go there to get your fill.”

He already has.

Member
Pravious
Account Created
1 day ago
Last Active
2 hours ago
Visit Count
17
Discussions Started
0
Comments Added
4

[dirtboy]

I read it dirt....it was spoken from anger......we don’t just trash members from anger....they get a cool down and a chance to think......

I'm sorry. That post was beyond the pale.

[NittanyLion]

I'll just throw this out, and take it for what it's worth. I may be in the small minority on this...but I really don't care what people are saying about this site on any other sites. So why are we posting it here?

I can certainly breeze right by it, so it isn't as though it's a real issue. But I've never understood the rationale behind sitting on one site and tracking another.

[ScreamingFist]

keep digging.....

[ScreamingFist]

Don’t care man, they’re gone......

[dirtboy]

DG is a good guy. He has not been a pro-Rudy, anti-conservative troll.

His comments deserve consideration, even if you disagree with them.

[KevinDavis]

I did..

[NautiNurse]

Your hypocrisy and lack of moral character is showing again.

To: NautiNurse

Try the decaf and STFU.

3,497 posted on 04/22/2007 9:40:35 PM EDT by mkjessup

[BykrBayb]

Just popped in to say hello. I hope you're doing well. As for me, I've had a howlingly good week, and I'm feeling just peachy. Hate to post and run, but duty calls.

[wagglebee]

You did what?

I’m sure over at the anti-Freeper site you are a member of they are happy to validate your dislike for religious conservatives. But there is nothing in the Declaration of Independence or Constitution to back up your views.

[bjs1779]

The glee in stifling dissent and the herding of long time members to the bugzapper is unprecedented at FR.

Nobody was "herded". Nobody was killed. If you remember correctly, it was your side that had the "glee" in the actual killing of Terri Schiavo.

[ScreamingFist]

The “man” has no respect for FR nor himself......don’t bother NN, he want’s a fight......screw him...he had a honorable way out, he choose poorly....

[Rb ver. 2.0]

“the Declaration of Independence proclaims that all men are created equal and endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, including the right to Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness.”

It was a fraudulent statement at the time and we’re still paying the price for the founder’s failure to include the black man as “all men”.

[KevinDavis]

Uh yes... We do have a Muslim in Congress, a Jew in a Senate, a Mormon running for President..

Yes we this country was founded on Christian values, but we have a secular government..

Even if I did post at the other site big frakin deal..

[gondramB]

>>Correct, government officials cannot be bound by any religious test. You have yet to show anything that indicates that there is a “separation of church and state.”<<

There is a clear prohibition against the government establishing an official religion or prevent the citizens from freedom to practice religion.

But somehow this has been twisted around and citizens are being prohibited from religious expression whenever they step out onto public property. I don’t understand how the first ammendment can be so misinterpreted as to now say that government has to suppress freedom of religion in public.

It would be so stupid as to be funny if it wasn’t so serious.

[Rb ver. 2.0]

Your obsession with associations has a Stalinist flavor. Back off and stop being so communist.

[mkjessup]

DG is a good guy. He has not been a pro-Rudy, anti-conservative troll.
His comments deserve consideration, even if you disagree with them.

He stated that I 'represented everything that's wrong with FR', I suggested he get his vision checked. That was a pretty mild response.

I think I gave his post all the consideration that it warranted.

And I didn't call him a 'little vulgar worm', nor did I scream at him to 'STFU' as was done to me by the posters DG apparently overlooked while he was admonishing me.

[WorkerbeeCitizen]

Bookmark

[Iwo Jima]

You are clueless and dishonorable and unworthy of any type of response from me.