Will FR embrace socialism to make way for Rudy Giuliani as a Republican presidential candidate?

vanity | April 21, 2007 | Jim Robinson

[Jim Robinson]

We've got some real challenges facing us. FR was established to fight against government corruption, overstepping, and abuse and to fight for a return to the limited constitutional government as envisioned and set forth by our founding fathers in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution and other founding documents.

One of the biggest cases of government corruption, overstepping and abuse that I know of is its disgraceful headlong slide into a socialist hell. Our founders never intended for abortion to be the law of the land. And they never intended the Supreme Court to be a legislative body. They never intended God or religion to be written out of public life. They never intended government to be used to deny God's existence or for government to be used to force sexual perversions onto our society or into our children's education curriculum. They never intend for government to disarm the people. They never intended for government to set up sanctuary cities for illegals. They never intended government to “rule” over the people and or to take their earnings or private property or to deprive them of their constitutional rights to free speech, free religion, private property, due process, etc. They never intended government to seize the private property of private citizens through draconian asset forfeiture laws or laws allowing government to take private property from lawful owners to give to developers. Or to seize wealth and redistribute it to others. Or to provide government forced health insurance or government forced retirement systems.

All of the above are examples of ever expanding socialism and tyranny brought to us by liberals/liberalism.

FR fights against the liberals/Democrats in all of these areas and always will. Now if liberalism infiltrates into the Republican party and Republicans start promoting all this socialist garbage, do you think that I or FR will suddenly stop fighting against it? Do you think I'm going to bow down and accept abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, global warming, illegal alien lawbreakers, gun control, asset forfeiture, socialism, tyranny, totalitarianism, etc, etc, etc, just so some fancy New York liberal lawyer can become president from the Republican party?

Do you really expect me to do that?

[EternalVigilance]

;-)

[Kevmo]

Watch yer step, too. With a login name like yours, someone’s likely to key up on you after contributing to the adult beverage consumption economy.

[mkjessup]

I put in "bugzapperthread"

What kind of keyword would you suggest for this lil' item EV?

'Did Rudy Help Enable 9/11 Hijackers?' (my headline)

From National Review Online, June 2005

[Interview of author Fred Siegel by Kathyrn Jean Lopez]

(mkj note: Fred Siegel is ironically, one of Rudy Giuliani's biggest fans and supporters, who wrote 'Prince of the City']

Q - "How did Giuliani's immigration policy contribute to our 9/11 intelligence failure?"

A - [ Fred Siegel] - "Giuliani's lax policy on immigration helped allow several of the hijackers to operate comfortably in Brooklyn only a few blocks from my house."

Now isn't THIS an interesting angle? This ranks right up there (IMHO) with John F'in Kerry's dismissal of FAA security officials who desperately tried to warn Kerry about the lack of security at Logan International in the Spring of 2001 which could open the door to terrorist hijackings of airliners.

How ironic this damning revelation comes from one of Rudy's biggest fans.

[dixiechick2000]

Not that I’ve seen.

Her last post was here...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1821435/posts?page=1634#1634

...and I guess her new administrative job at WA doesn’t allow her to spend any more time here. ;o)

BTW, I’m trapped in librul Portland. LOL

[EternalVigilance]

“Giuliunintendedconsequences”

[Kevmo]

Nice catch.

[mkjessup]

“Giuliunintendedconsequences”

That was quick.

[Reagan Man]

Her last post was over here.

[EternalVigilance]

But...but...but...NO ONE ELSE can defeat the terrorists! /angry sarcasm

[EternalVigilance]

Good thing it didn’t have to be a real one. Don’t think it would fit. ;-)

[mkjessup]

But...but...but...NO ONE ELSE can defeat the terrorists! /angry sarcasm

Yeah. Imagine that. :|

[Kevmo]

I’m going to put in Mass Resignation and Self Immolation after reading JimRob’s post at # 12,041.

[EternalVigilance]

Good idea.

[dixiechick2000]

Oh...I KNOW that. ;o)

I’m not too fond of your posts.
You are quite brusk with them.

BUT, I do like that the “harpies” haven’t been able to get rid of you.

MOST impressive. LOL

[EternalVigilance]

Chickens coming home to roost ping...

[Reagan Man]

You need to read all my posts. My bluntness comes from being born and raised in NYC. No time for BS. And I am only harsh and ungracious to those who are harsh and ungracious to me.

Otherwise, I'm a nice guy and a good conservative. ;^)

[mkjessup]

Ruh roh, have some power flux going on in my locale, looks like I’m going to have to shut down for a while. I’ll pick back up later today.

G’nite to everyone!

‘sic semper rudybotus’ lol

[dixiechick2000]

No...chickens feeling comfortable about coming out of their hidey hole bump!

[EternalVigilance]

Oh no. You’ve been called “brusk”!

If I listed out the names I’ve been called in the last few days, I’d probably get banned.

;-)

[jedward]

Good news Bump for the hidey holers :)