Will FR embrace socialism to make way for Rudy Giuliani as a Republican presidential candidate?

vanity | April 21, 2007 | Jim Robinson

[Jim Robinson]

We've got some real challenges facing us. FR was established to fight against government corruption, overstepping, and abuse and to fight for a return to the limited constitutional government as envisioned and set forth by our founding fathers in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution and other founding documents.

One of the biggest cases of government corruption, overstepping and abuse that I know of is its disgraceful headlong slide into a socialist hell. Our founders never intended for abortion to be the law of the land. And they never intended the Supreme Court to be a legislative body. They never intended God or religion to be written out of public life. They never intended government to be used to deny God's existence or for government to be used to force sexual perversions onto our society or into our children's education curriculum. They never intend for government to disarm the people. They never intended for government to set up sanctuary cities for illegals. They never intended government to “rule” over the people and or to take their earnings or private property or to deprive them of their constitutional rights to free speech, free religion, private property, due process, etc. They never intended government to seize the private property of private citizens through draconian asset forfeiture laws or laws allowing government to take private property from lawful owners to give to developers. Or to seize wealth and redistribute it to others. Or to provide government forced health insurance or government forced retirement systems.

All of the above are examples of ever expanding socialism and tyranny brought to us by liberals/liberalism.

FR fights against the liberals/Democrats in all of these areas and always will. Now if liberalism infiltrates into the Republican party and Republicans start promoting all this socialist garbage, do you think that I or FR will suddenly stop fighting against it? Do you think I'm going to bow down and accept abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, global warming, illegal alien lawbreakers, gun control, asset forfeiture, socialism, tyranny, totalitarianism, etc, etc, etc, just so some fancy New York liberal lawyer can become president from the Republican party?

Do you really expect me to do that?

[Knitting A Conundrum]

No it isn’t. Her stated purpose is to keep the GOP in charge of the White House. That’s different.

She knows everything that Rudy stands for is bad.

Too much angst is being caused by looking to the general election.

We need to focus on what’s before us, not November 2008. What’s before us is the hard work of getting a good conservative nominated. Let’s focus on the task at hand and stop killing ourselves with “What do I do if the worst happens?”

[Reagan Man]

If anyone knows why NapkinUser was zapped, please post it.

[Kryptonite]

When you find out why NapkinUser was suspended, please let me know. I was the first to recognize that, and it baffles me.

[calcowgirl]

Thanks—and you’re welcome. :-)

[EternalVigilance]

Could you tell us why NapkinUser was suspended? It’s pretty mysterious, because they have been such a solid conservative poster.

[The Spirit Of Allegiance]

Our grand business undoubtedly is,
not to see what lies dimly at a distance,
but do to what lies clearly at hand.

— Thomas Carlyle

[Tolsti]

Good riddance to liberal noise.

[EternalVigilance]

Great quote.

[Knitting A Conundrum]

And it’s time to roll up our sleeves, make contacts with others if we haven’t yet, and get organized.

[EternalVigilance]

I’m not familiar with what you’re talking about.

[Tolsti]

The banned poster.

[Reagan Man]

>>>>>We need to focus on what’s before us, not November 2008.

That's what I've been telling Chena. She isn't listening. Last resorts are called that for a reason. Broadcasting today, what you're gonna do in Nov2008, is not consistent with a last resort. Especially not on a forum populated by mostly conservatives.

[T'wit]

>> RadioAstronomer isn't here to defend himself anymore.

That's because he was thrown out for bad behavior.

[EternalVigilance]

I’ve never seen any evidence of liberalism from NapkinUser. Care to give us a link?

[Tolsti]

Well he’s banned, proof enough.

[EternalVigilance]

Well he’s banned, proof enough.

Not necessarily.

[Tolsti]

Are you suggestion a mistake might’ve been made?

[Reagan Man]

>>>>>I’ve never seen any evidence of liberalism from NapkinUser. Care to give us a link?

Ditto!

[Dad yer funny]

,,.. um , perhaps Tolsti was just making a “drive-by flipant comment” [/srcsm]

[EternalVigilance]

Are you suggestion a mistake might’ve been made?

Maybe. That's why I and others asked. We don't know what happened.