Live Thread: President Bush to make statement on prosecutor controversy at 5:45PM ET

Fox News | 03/20/2007

[notes2005]

just breaking on FOX

[cbkaty]

Translation: Bush to the liberals: Stick it where the sun don't shine. I love it

Excellent...it's about time he locked and loaded...

[onyx]

LOL -- yeah, he loves face time and with his face, I always have to wonder why. :0)

[txrangerette]

Just a guess...didn't see Tancredo, but if he wants the President impeached I can't believe it would be over emails circulating. Think it would be more over the border, the border agents convicted and jailed, and over the fact that he can't stand Gonzalez to HIS policies on these issues.

[ShandaLear]

OFF Tancredo's cracker! LOL!

[Howlin]

I cannot even begin to fathom this ugly, power drunk party winning the White House in '08. I don't care who I have to vote for.

It is time for those of us who have been called traitors on this forum because we are not 'pure' enough conservatively to fight back and not let these one issue people take this country to hell.

[onyx]

I'm still watching Brit --- did Tancredo actually call for POTUS to be impeached?

[SoCalPol]

Schmucky tries to out Hillary, Hillary.
Mark was all ready on this guy.

[ShandaLear]

I completely agree with you. Our one issue conservatives are just as bad as the left's moonbats and more destructive.

[onyx]

I really want clarification on Tancredo's statements.

[Oliver Optic]

If Tancredo wanted to attack Gonzales, he should have done so before it became the Democrats' cause celeb.

Right now, he really just needs to be quiet.

[txrangerette]

Sorry, it should read "he can't stand Gonzalez (DUE) to HIS policies".

[Howlin]

Yes, they are.

They are giving the moderates all the reason they need not to support the GOP.

[Txsleuth]

NO...but when John Gibson asked him if he would back off of the call for Gonzalez to be fired...he said NO, I will not.

He said "I have my reasons"...and John said, "Don't tell me, let me guess, does it start with and 'I'?"

Tancredo said YES...

Now...I posted that because I figured the only "I" word that Gibson would bring up..but not want to say the word, is IMPEACH.

I have heard Dana Rohrbacher and other REP Congressmen discussing a possible impeachment of Bush.

I put 2 and 2 together.

However, if you guys don't think that is what he means..then maybe that is wrong.

Could the "I" word have been "immigration"??? If so, why would John Gibson not want to say the word???

I am open to comments, and suggestions.

[Cap Huff]

Joke??? Me joke??? LOL!!!

;-)

[Peach]

It is time for those of us who have been called traitors on this forum because we are not 'pure' enough conservatively to fight back and not let these one issue people take this country to hell.

Ditto. Maybe turnabout is fair play and we should call freepers who don't care as much as we do about fiscal conservatism or national security issues the traitors. LOL

[HKMk23]

...Shoooomer...

You forgot the other "r"; it's "Shroooomer".

[WalterSkinner]

..don't worry though--John Cornyn of Texas just kicked his behind to the curb

C-Span2

[Howlin]

All the more reason to support Gonzales, IMO. :-)

[Chena]

I want clarification on Tancredo's statements too, onyx. I don't think that man has had both oars in the water for a long time, but if this latest "impeach" talk is true, the man has now fallen right out of the boat.

[Peach]

Thanks for the clarification; I'll bet you're right.