NO...but when John Gibson asked him if he would back off of the call for Gonzalez to be fired...he said NO, I will not.
He said "I have my reasons"...and John said, "Don't tell me, let me guess, does it start with and 'I'?"
Tancredo said YES...
Now...I posted that because I figured the only "I" word that Gibson would bring up..but not want to say the word, is IMPEACH.
I have heard Dana Rohrbacher and other REP Congressmen discussing a possible impeachment of Bush.
I put 2 and 2 together.
However, if you guys don't think that is what he means..then maybe that is wrong.
Could the "I" word have been "immigration"??? If so, why would John Gibson not want to say the word???
I am open to comments, and suggestions.
Thanks for the clarification; I'll bet you're right.
I put nothing past Tancredo, but he IS AS WE KNOW APOPLECTIC over the Immigration issue, so it's entirely possible he meant that word and not impeachment.
I think so. Tancredo is a Johnny One Note.
If so, why would John Gibson not want to say the word???
Probably because Gibson thought he was being witty and erudite.
Yeah --- the "I" word is probably immigration. I wish Gibson would have just said "immigration." It's still unclear.
Please see my post #513
I was listening to Tancredo...Schumer at the same time.
I posted what I HEARD in post #513...so my speculation may have been off.
However, I posted on another post what Tancredo said about the Administration imploding..and not know who is running it..and something about someone needing a pilot's license...
IOW, Tancredo was HARD to follow tonight..and I apologize if I got any of you upset for nothing.
If Tancredo meant "immigration" instead of "impeachment", I was wrong...I just wonder why Gibson wouldn't say immigration...and I DO know I read that Rohrbacher is talking about impeachment over the two border guards.
I am VERY sorry if I got it wrong...