Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Keep Darwin's 'lies' out of Polish schools: education official
AFP via Yahoo! News ^ | October 14, 2006

Posted on 10/14/2006 11:16:50 AM PDT by lizol

Keep Darwin's 'lies' out of Polish schools: education official 2 hours.

WARSAW (AFP) - Poland's deputy education minister called for the influential evolutionary theories of Charles Darwin not to be taught in the country's schools, branding them "lies."

"The theory of evolution is a lie, an error that we have legalised as a common truth," Miroslaw Orzechowski, the deputy minister in the country's right-wing coalition government, was quoted as saying by the Gazeta Wyborcza daily Saturday.

Orzechowski said the theory was "a feeble idea of an aged non-believer," who had come up with it "perhaps because he was a vegetarian and lacked fire inside him."

The evolution theory of the 19th-century British naturalist holds that existing animals and plants are the result of natural selection which eliminated inferior species gradually over time. This conflicts with the "creationist" theory that God created all life on the planet in a finite number.

Orzechowski called for a debate on whether Darwin's theory should be taught in schools.

"We should not teach lies, just as we should not teach bad instead of good, or ugliness instead of beauty," he said. "We are not going to withdraw (Darwin's theory) from the school books, but we should start to discuss it."

The deputy minister is a member of a Catholic far-right political group, the League of Polish Families. The league's head, Roman Giertych, is education minister in the conservative coalition government of Prime Minister Jaroslaw Kaczynski.

Giertych's father Maciej, who represents the league in the European Parliament, organised a discussion there last week on Darwinism. He described the theory as "not supported by proof" and called for it be removed from school books.

The far-right joined the government in May when Kaczynski's ruling conservative Law and Justice (PiS) party, after months of ineffective minority government, formed a coalition including LPR and the populist Sambroon party.

Roman Giertych has not spoken out on Darwinism, but the far-right politician's stance on other issues has stirred protest in Poland since he joined the government.

A school pupils' association was expected to demonstrate in front of the education ministry on Saturday to call for his resignation.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: creationism; crevolist; darwin; education; enoughalready; evolution; faith; keywordwars; moralabsolutes; poland; preacher; religion; seethingnaturalists; skullporn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 1,061-1,070 next last
To: Fester Chugabrew
There are many scientific disciplines that may be used to support the philosophy of history known as "the theory of evolution." As a whole however, the theory of evolution is not science. It isn't even useful as a so-called science. If one wants usefulness and progress out of science, then he should take up intelligent design, without which the universe would be neither useful nor intelligible.

Young earth creationist lecturing us on science ===> Placemarker <===

61 posted on 10/14/2006 2:57:07 PM PDT by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman
Oh come on, you could drive a truck through evolution's holes.

Feel free to produce said truck here. I am all eyes.

They teach it like the gospel truth, rather than scientific theory. Thats my only objection.

Yes, like they teach that silly "Gravity" thing -- the Theory not the experience. Do you also object to chemistry and physics?

62 posted on 10/14/2006 2:58:20 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (ID: bad science, bad theology and, above all, bad philology)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew
Calling the theory of evolution a "science" - calling something a thing which it is not - what do we call that? I'll be charitable and call it a "misnomer."

I see you have gone from sophomoric drunken philosophy to flat-out dis- and mis-information.

Well, we all have to evolve, I suppose.

63 posted on 10/14/2006 2:59:53 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (ID: bad science, bad theology and, above all, bad philology)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew
As a whole however, the theory of evolution is not science. It isn't even useful as a so-called science

How so? The theory is supported by the evidence.

nayway, as I said, I'm quite willing to entertain the idea of a Divine input, but that doesn't mean that it's the Hebrew God as the source of that input. Could be Brahmah, or Isis for that matter. It worries me that ID can be a mask for Biblical fundmentalism.

64 posted on 10/14/2006 2:59:59 PM PDT by Da_Shrimp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: stultorum
But they're more than lies as they are intent on poisoning the minds and spirits of our children with un-Godly thought.

Good thing they now will know that angels hold airplanes aloft and that using this "science" thing is evil EVIL, I tell you.

"Nehemiah Scudder, call on Line One."

65 posted on 10/14/2006 3:02:07 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (ID: bad science, bad theology and, above all, bad philology)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Da_Shrimp
It worries me that ID can be a mask for Biblical fundmentalism.

A transparent mask. It is like a glass Trojan Horse.

66 posted on 10/14/2006 3:03:00 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (ID: bad science, bad theology and, above all, bad philology)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: thomaswest
In most cases, science strictly speaking confines itself to experimentation and observation (both directly and indirectly) on a small scale with the aid of reason as it is applied in particular ways. When matters of ultimate history and causation are induced or deduced, and expressions made regarding the same (i.e. when the bigger picture is presented as with evolution in the wide sense) we are entering the realm of philosophy and exiting the realm of science.

In view of the text of our Constitution it is an abomination to expect the theory of evolution to enjoy an exclusive hearing by law in public schools, regardless of any further implications.

67 posted on 10/14/2006 3:04:54 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7
God bless Poland and don't take our atheists here too seriously. They are a very small but very vocal minority.

But the majority of us who UNDERSTAND science and are Christian call on the Poles to reject anti-scientism as a path to destruction. The USA can withstand a generation of willful ignorance and purposeful dumbing-down -- Poland cannot.

68 posted on 10/14/2006 3:05:11 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (ID: bad science, bad theology and, above all, bad philology)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Da_Shrimp
I like your post.

The quibble I have about "Divine input" is that in order for it to be seen as a valid part of how nature behaves and scientific, there must be some understanding of how and where it happened. Eventually, it has to be measureable.

It is insufficient to wave hands and say God did it. One must be able to say, "ah it happened here at this time, and all the evidence points to it."

The burden for the creationists/IDists is that "God did it" can be used by the uneducated any time they like to "explain" anything they don't understand. Since GDI explains everything, it explains nothing.

69 posted on 10/14/2006 3:05:16 PM PDT by thomaswest (Thank god for evolution! Without it, we wouldn't be here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
Yes, dumbing down a whole country is certainly the path to riches.

Don't read too much into this statement. It's an outburst by a member of a fringe fundamentalist party that the ruling party stupidly allowed into the governing coalition in order to get a majority. They're paying the price now.

70 posted on 10/14/2006 3:05:45 PM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew
When matters of ultimate history and causation are induced or deduced, and expressions made regarding the same (i.e. when the bigger picture is presented as with evolution in the wide sense) we are entering the realm of philosophy and exiting the realm of science.

Oh, I see you ARE still espousing drunken sophomoric philosophy.

*whew* You have me worried.

71 posted on 10/14/2006 3:06:20 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (ID: bad science, bad theology and, above all, bad philology)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: curiosity

Good to know.

And I hope you see your words in my tag :)


72 posted on 10/14/2006 3:06:48 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (ID: bad science, bad theology and, above all, bad philology)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
But the majority of us who UNDERSTAND science

So you believe all life came from single cell via undirected means and that this has been established beyond all argument?

73 posted on 10/14/2006 3:10:41 PM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew
we may reasonably infer as much....of man evolving from another species.

What is your objection to inferring in this context?

It seems to me that you would object to historians believing anything. For instance, there is not a human alive with "direct observation" of Julius Caesar. Do you therefore argue that the prior existence of Caesar is a lie?

74 posted on 10/14/2006 3:10:44 PM PDT by thomaswest (Thank god for evolution! Without it, we wouldn't be here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

Comment #75 Removed by Moderator

To: Coyoteman

Although many may label me as a "young earth creationist" I am at heart a "big earth creationist."


76 posted on 10/14/2006 3:13:10 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: lizol
"Poland's deputy education minister called for the influential evolutionary theories of Charles Darwin not to be taught in the country's schools, branding them "lies." "

This gentleman speaks the truth. Evolution is a big lie and others are seeing it. No need to taint the minds of children with such nonsense.
77 posted on 10/14/2006 3:13:48 PM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew
You espouse a well-known logical fallacy. Namely, that the validity of an idea is to be determined by its utility or usefulness.

One variation of this flawed thinking is the argument that the validity of a proposition is to be judged by its effect on society. Interestingly, this was a favorite argument of communist theoreticians.

78 posted on 10/14/2006 3:16:52 PM PDT by thomaswest (The truth will make you free. But it may tick you off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Axlrose
"Darwinism is in retreat. The secularists are running."

Very true!

Watch how nasty evolutionists get on this thread. For THEM, evolution is THEIR RELIGION. Never mind that there is NO, absolutely NO evidence to support their HYPOTHESIS. Yes, hypothesis. It's not even a theory by their OWN definition of a theory. Yet that doesn't stop them from touting it now as a "fact". It only goes to show just how far they are removed from reality. Evolutionists live in a fanatical dream world supported by JUNK science.
79 posted on 10/14/2006 3:17:02 PM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7

"They are a very small but very vocal minority.

Thank God they are few in numbers.

I will admit, though, that they're very fanatical in that they redouble their efforts and give solidity to their "theory" when they see it falling apart with each passing day.


80 posted on 10/14/2006 3:18:22 PM PDT by stultorum (dont hire illegal aliens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 1,061-1,070 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson