Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Foley Claims He Was Molested by Clergyman When He Was a Teen
FoxNews ^ | 10/3/06 | FoxNews

Posted on 10/03/2006 3:22:32 PM PDT by ableLight

Edited on 10/03/2006 3:55:08 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

Attorney: Foley Was Molested as a Teen by a Clergyman

WASHINGTON — Former Rep. Mark Foley was molested between the ages 13 and 15 by a clergyman, his attorney Mark Roth told reporters late Tuesday.

Foley also wants Americans to know that he is a gay man but he never had sexual contact with a minor, Roth said. Foley was admitted on Saturday night to a mental health facility, where he will remain for at least 30 days.

Roth said Foley wanted to release the name and religious affiliation where his alleged molestation occurred, but was advised by civil counsel to delay naming names at this time. However, details of the clergyman, the timeframe and the situation will be released when counsel advises Foley to do so.

Excerpt


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aids; caca; cawcaw; childpredator; disease; fagdom; foley; foleygate; goshitsnotmyfault; hiv; homosexual; immorality; itsnotmyfault; macaca; nambla; pedophile; sodomite; sodomy; wellthatexplainsit; wheredogayscomefrom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 321 next last
To: sappy
The lefts favorite trick. Indict the GOP, indict the church. Split the "evangelical" voter block, get illegals on the rolls with no ID requirements and voila. Election victory.

I'm glad to read your comments, because you get it.

When the pro-illegal-alien rallies backfired on the Democrats, they had to resort to other dirty tricks.

If the House falls into Democratic hands, watch out for Democratic Congressmen voting instant amnesty for the illegal aliens, especially the ones who voted on the fall election.

101 posted on 10/03/2006 3:39:03 PM PDT by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

Comment #102 Removed by Moderator

To: Howlin

Dear Howlin,

"Where is the crime here? Can somebody tell me where the crime is if the facts are as we know them now, that he IM'd boys of legal age?"

Ironically, it appears that Mr. Foley would have been better off, legally-speaking, have actual sex with his correspondents.

Apparently, the age of consent in Washington, DC is 16.

However, Mr. Foley pushed hard for legislation that makes a felony out of prurient communications via the Internet with anyone under the age of 18.

Thus, chatting about it over the Internet appears to be a felony, but actually doing it is not.

* * * * *

"Its a mixed up muddled up shook up world except for Lola"


sitetest


103 posted on 10/03/2006 3:39:15 PM PDT by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred

Thanks


104 posted on 10/03/2006 3:39:31 PM PDT by ableLight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Where is the crime here?

There is no crime as it stands now but that is of no issue to the Dems.

William Jefferson was caught red handed committing a felony and he still holds his seat.

Karl Rove did nothing and the head of the Democrat Party, Minority Leader and others called for his immediate dismissal and arrest.

Now Foley does something stupid and reprehensible but no illegal, resigns immediately and the whole Republican Party is to blame.

Hypocrite thy name is Democrat.
105 posted on 10/03/2006 3:40:31 PM PDT by msnimje (Seriously, if it REALLY were a religion of PEACE, would they have to label it as such?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: GQuagmire

Well, given most Floridians are from somewhere else, who's to say a Mass. parish didn't dump a bad priest or two on us?


106 posted on 10/03/2006 3:40:41 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Treaty Fetishism: "[The] belief that a piece of paper will alter the behavior of thugs." R. Lowry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: ableLight

He's in "good" company. That's close to the Amish killer's excuse today in a note he left behind.


107 posted on 10/03/2006 3:40:44 PM PDT by MaineVoter2002 (http://www.cafenetamerica.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ableLight

Good grief. Could this story get any more revolting or pathetic?

Do everybody a favor Foley. STFU, crawl under a rock, and never ever EVER come out.

Neesh.


108 posted on 10/03/2006 3:41:06 PM PDT by VictoryGal (Never give up, never surrender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #109 Removed by Moderator

To: ableLight

NOTICE: This scandal has officially "jumped the shark".


110 posted on 10/03/2006 3:41:33 PM PDT by Califelephant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I_Love_My_Husband
Gays love him(mccgreevey) and they call the guy who said he was sexually harassed by him as a bs'er.

That's exactly right and the poster who said mccgreevey wasn't being embraced by the democrat base or homosexual lobby is mistaken.

The appearance on Oprah is nirvana to them.

111 posted on 10/03/2006 3:41:41 PM PDT by Dane ("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: sitetest

Yep. This is just setting up for criminal defense. I'll bet whoever this priest "was" is long dead and conveniently unable to refute such charges - if he decides to throw someone under the bus.


112 posted on 10/03/2006 3:42:05 PM PDT by Rutles4Ever ("My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness." (2 Cor. 12:9))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: ableLight

Foley needs to just crawl under rock. A press conference with his lawyer only draws more attention to the scandal. He's already done enough damage to the GOP.


113 posted on 10/03/2006 3:42:06 PM PDT by New Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRios1968

Good grief, give me a break...troll equals new member?


114 posted on 10/03/2006 3:42:14 PM PDT by mel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: VictoryGal

I agree. And it's especially infuriating b/c he associated himself with the RNC. He should have been true to what he was and joined the rats.


115 posted on 10/03/2006 3:42:38 PM PDT by ableLight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: mel

Do yourself a favor and read the whole thread...


116 posted on 10/03/2006 3:43:05 PM PDT by JRios1968 (Tagline wanted...inquire within)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: WillT

You asked -- "Is there anyone left in America that hasn't been molested?"

Well, sometimes I wonder. Perhaps not. So, what does that do for everyone?

Regards,
Star Traveler


117 posted on 10/03/2006 3:43:14 PM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: ableLight

I looked now and it says he switched in the '80s. I think it said '90s yesterday, but there have been hundreds of changes made to the page in the past couple of days.


118 posted on 10/03/2006 3:43:19 PM PDT by Rastus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

"Well, given most Floridians are from somewhere else, who's to say a Mass. parish didn't dump a bad priest or two on us?"


Very possible....I wonder where sicko Paul Shandley was at that time


119 posted on 10/03/2006 3:43:30 PM PDT by GQuagmire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: msnimje
Something I've missed, is the timeline here. Noted on WSJ respnse to todays editorial on Foley..."Could a gay congressman be quarantined?"

The Timing Is Important Mary Neale - Baltimore, Md.

The sexually explicit instant messages that were made public last Friday pre-dated the email Mr. Foley sent in 2005 which was the communication brought to the attention of the Republican leadership in 2005. The instant message two-way conversation happened in 2003.

It is possible that Mr. Foley never sent another sexually explicit instant message after he was interviewed and counseled by the Republican party authorities designated to do so. None of the Republican leadership had any knowledge of the 2003 instant messages.

The sloppy quality of reporting on this October surprise is almost as disappointing to me as Mr. Foley's behavior.

120 posted on 10/03/2006 3:43:37 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 321 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson