Posted on 09/07/2006 5:01:30 AM PDT by leadpenny
Darrell Anderson, the young Lexington soldier who deserted to Canada last year after being wounded in Iraq, wants to come home.
Anderson, now 24, has been an outspoken critic of U.S. policy in Iraq while living in Canada, appearing at peace rallies and attacking the Bush administration in interviews with international publications. Earlier this year, he married a Canadian woman, which his mother said should guarantee him permanent residency in Canada.
But Lexington's Anita Anderson confirmed that her son now wants to return to the United States sometime within the next few weeks. He could be arrested as soon as he crosses the border, she said. If not, he plans to travel to Kentucky, turn himself in at Fort Knox, and face whatever punishment the Army imposes, she said.
A number of peace groups and activists -- possibly including Cindy Sheehan -- will meet him when he crosses the U.S. border, she said. She said she expects considerable press coverage.
Darrell Anderson was on a trip to northern Canada yesterday and unavailable for comment.
But Anita Anderson said she has urged him to stay in Canada.
"I've tried to talk him out of coming back, because he's probably going to get sponsorship in Canada now that he is married to a Canadian girl," she said. "But he's constantly stressed out and worried, and he feels like he can't live out the rest of his life this way."
(Excerpt) Read more at kentucky.com ...
I'd be inclined to substitute "theory" for "practice".
Ok
Gabby Hayes had whiskers. Karl Marx had a beard.
-- George Carlin...when he was funny
Yeah...THAT brilliant move is really gonna help him at his court martial.
Don't sentence the Canadians to having to put up with these punks. Leavenworth will do just fine for him.
Canada will chuck him back anyways but the wheels of "justice" in Canada are really slow and a bit creaky./s
IMO, it will go better for him if he turns himself in, in the USA, and saves himself and Canada the wasted time.
Yes it is your tax dollars that did all of that in the past but it is my tax dollars that are keeping this bum on welfare in Canada.
Take him back and help us here raise our collective IQ. After all we tolerated him here in the first place which isn't too smart.
Good idea would be to start a draft, just for him, and send him to Afghanistan. He is already trained, but again, our soldiers are showing great courage in battle which he lacked. ( That is why he's up here right?)
Nah..Take him back, keep your Dixie Chicks while your at it. We have enough problems with our home grown loonies without having to import! By the way, God bless America and your troops doing a bang up job in Iraq!
"All those rich people in my country sent me to die
for oil and my education," he says. "I don't feel like I want to go back right now. Maybe if
things change."
Oh please. No one forced you to raise your hand. You are an idiot or you are a liar.
The guy looks like a terrorist. How do we know he hasn't coverted up there and is now part of the jihad against America? Look at him!
A bit more complicated than that. A declaration of war against a foreign government presupposes that there's a foreign sovereign to declare war on. The US didn't recognize the North Vietnamese as a legitimate government, and took part in Korea as part of a UN force, so a US declaration of war wouldn't have been appropriate.
For that matter, the US never declared war against the Confederacy, because its position was that the CSA was not a sovereign government, but a domestic rebellion.
I know it's legalistic nit-picking, but war is always a political act. And I will note that I don't see any international political reason -- though plenty of domestic ones -- not to declare war on Iraq in 1991 or 2003.
Oh please. No one forced you to raise your hand. You are an idiot or you are a liar.
No, he is just a coward pure and simple.
Yes, but legalistic nitpicking is the reason these deserters have no fear of the death penalty. Any lawyer worth his salt would argue that we weren't "at war".
Moreover, Congress has the power "To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;"... It says nothing about there being a foreign government being involved. The situation vis a vis Iraq and Afghanistan is little different from the war on the Barbary pirates.
Unbelievable is right. You try to call BS, tell me what I'm thinking and then get your wittle fewings hurt when I called you on it. Learn to read for comprehension and let others do their own thinking.
"Leadbrain!" Name calling. That's when you lost, REMF.
And it'd be a pretty strong argument, because we've been "at war" -- by some definition or other -- for nearly all of my lifetime. I was born in 1970, but the assessment would be the same if I'd been born in 1950.
I don't know the UCMJ well, but I do know (or at least believe, I could be wrong) that the highest form of desertion -- the one that customarily carries the death sentence -- is desertion in the face of the enemy. It's an important distinction.
If you're counting on someone to ship out with you, that's different from counting on someone to cover your backside in a firefight. Failure to do either is reprehensible, but the one that is more likely to get people killed is deserving of more severe punishment. If you're going to bail, better to bail stateside.
Off to Leavenworth, bub.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.