Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LexBaird
Congress hasn't had the balls to declare war since WWII.

A bit more complicated than that. A declaration of war against a foreign government presupposes that there's a foreign sovereign to declare war on. The US didn't recognize the North Vietnamese as a legitimate government, and took part in Korea as part of a UN force, so a US declaration of war wouldn't have been appropriate.

For that matter, the US never declared war against the Confederacy, because its position was that the CSA was not a sovereign government, but a domestic rebellion.

I know it's legalistic nit-picking, but war is always a political act. And I will note that I don't see any international political reason -- though plenty of domestic ones -- not to declare war on Iraq in 1991 or 2003.

91 posted on 09/07/2006 2:15:23 PM PDT by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: ReignOfError
I know it's legalistic nit-picking, but war is always a political act

Yes, but legalistic nitpicking is the reason these deserters have no fear of the death penalty. Any lawyer worth his salt would argue that we weren't "at war".

Moreover, Congress has the power "To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;"... It says nothing about there being a foreign government being involved. The situation vis a vis Iraq and Afghanistan is little different from the war on the Barbary pirates.

93 posted on 09/07/2006 3:06:13 PM PDT by LexBaird (Another member of the Bush/Halliburton/Zionist/CIA/NWO/Illuminati conspiracy for global domination!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson