Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush panders before the NAACP (Larry Elder)
Townhall.com ^ | July 27, 2006 | Larry Elder

Posted on 07/27/2006 5:14:37 PM PDT by EveningStar

President Bush addressed the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People -- after five years of invitations -- and blew it. He pandered, he condescended, all to show blacks that, yes, the president feels your pain...

(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush; larryelder; naacp; pandering
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: Mrs. Shawnlaw
Don't they realize that if something happened to the Prez and VPrez that Condi would be it?!?

Nope, and for good reason. The order of Presidential succession is VP, Speaker of the House, President pro tempore of the Senate, then the Sec. of State.

21 posted on 07/27/2006 5:34:05 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Firefigher NC

Let's compare. Bush has addressed the NAACP once in 8 years. Reagan Addressed the NAACP twice in 8 years.


22 posted on 07/27/2006 5:34:56 PM PDT by Texasforever (I have neither been there nor done that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Firefigher NC
I see the Bush apologists wasted no time to scold Elder for his correct criticism of the President on this.

Elder is wrong. Bush showed up, said a few niceties, then left.

He wasn't invited there to read the riot act.

23 posted on 07/27/2006 5:35:15 PM PDT by sinkspur (Today, we settled all family business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Comment #24 Removed by Moderator

To: Texasforever

Nobody's perfect, not even Reagan.


25 posted on 07/27/2006 5:37:02 PM PDT by Firefigher NC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Southack
It wasn't pandering, the reason he went was so the next group of Republicans don't have to start their Administrations off with the cloud of a previous administration having snubbed the NAACP.

That being said, we all know the NAACP is a racist organization that is race obsessed. They need to thinking of themselves as Americans and not a color to begin the rest of their journey toward the American dream.
26 posted on 07/27/2006 5:37:44 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Borders.Language.Beer.
You do one, you have to do them all, lest you piss off some interest group.

Be happy that Bush calls in, as Reagan did.

27 posted on 07/27/2006 5:37:51 PM PDT by sinkspur (Today, we settled all family business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Borders.Language.Beer.
Why not? Hmmmmmm????????

I don't know, maybe security?

28 posted on 07/27/2006 5:37:52 PM PDT by Texasforever (I have neither been there nor done that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Firefigher NC
Every president has addressed the annual convention of the NAACP since its inception. Up until the appearance Bush was the only no show.
29 posted on 07/27/2006 5:39:05 PM PDT by Texasforever (I have neither been there nor done that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Bush, the most pro-life president this country has ever had

If by pro-life you mean allowing the continual operation of thousands of extermination camp / eugenic centers to thrive across America (called "fertilization clinics" in newspeak), then yes he is very pro-life.
30 posted on 07/27/2006 5:39:12 PM PDT by jonesboheim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

He wasn't invited there to read the riot act.
-----
Well he should have -- he should have told those self-proclaimed victims to get off their lazy butts and become upstanding Americans, not to remain a bunch of leeches that require PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT AND PANDERING for their votes --- like Bush's Mexican friends!!!

I think my position on politicians pandering for votes is quite clear.


31 posted on 07/27/2006 5:40:00 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: jonesboheim
If by pro-life you mean allowing the continual operation of thousands of extermination camp / eugenic centers to thrive across America (called "fertilization clinics" in newspeak), then yes he is very pro-life.

Man you are really out there. GEEZE.

32 posted on 07/27/2006 5:40:12 PM PDT by Texasforever (I have neither been there nor done that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever

I'd just assume conservative Presidents not waste their time speaking at such an organization.


33 posted on 07/27/2006 5:40:42 PM PDT by Firefigher NC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Exactly. The man is the President, of ALL Americans, yet some folks would only be happy if he got in front of this particular group and said "Why do you morons consistently vote for the party that wanted to keep you as slaves?" But then, he'd be insulting those Republicans who are still fighting the Civil War, too, for bringing up THAT subject.

Nothing Bush could say at such an event would satisfy some people--nothing. And not going would achieve what?

34 posted on 07/27/2006 5:40:43 PM PDT by Darkwolf377 (http://www.savethesoldiers.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: jonesboheim
If by pro-life you mean allowing the continual operation of thousands of extermination camp / eugenic centers to thrive across America (called "fertilization clinics" in newspeak), then yes he is very pro-life.

He's a president, not a monarch.

Contact your congressman as he is the one who moves legislation.

35 posted on 07/27/2006 5:41:01 PM PDT by sinkspur (Today, we settled all family business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

Yep.


36 posted on 07/27/2006 5:41:27 PM PDT by Texasforever (I have neither been there nor done that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Firefigher NC
I'd just assume conservative Presidents not waste their time speaking at such an organization.

When you get to be president, you can turn down the invitation.

37 posted on 07/27/2006 5:42:31 PM PDT by sinkspur (Today, we settled all family business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Totally agree.


38 posted on 07/27/2006 5:42:47 PM PDT by KJC1 ("Thank you for the Hezbollah view." (Tony Snow to Helen Thomas))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #39 Removed by Moderator

To: EveningStar

So Larry Elder is going to say?: "Thank you Mr.President for your kind words."

If he said that he would be out of a job. "Deny, deny and deny some more that anybody is helping you, because if you don't, we will find someone who will keep up the denial game. You will be on the outside looking in if you don't comply."


40 posted on 07/27/2006 5:43:16 PM PDT by joem15 (If less is more, then what is plenty?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson