Posted on 06/29/2006 3:41:47 PM PDT by KeyLargo
POLL TO FREEP
Do you believe that The New York Times, L.A. Times and The Wall Street Journal SWIFT reports put at risk our national security? Yes
22% No
78%
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
78% Yes22% No
It is not changing even with a vote. Probably fixed.
We voted from several different computers and the numbers did not change..........
Yes!
The only reason that I recently viewed Dobbs show was his position on border protection, however I am very aware that he is still and will always be a lefty lib and flack for the DemoRATS.
|
Do you believe that The New York Times, L.A. Times and The Wall Street Journal SWIFT reports put at risk our national security?
|
|||
 |
|||
|
Yes
|
   |
22%
|
227 votes
|
 |
|||
|
No
|
  |
78%
|
803 votes
|
|
Total: 1030 votes
|
|||
|
|||
Did the same. No change yet. Figures.
rigged, as always...
Dobbs? I voted but my vote didn't count.
Do you believe that The New York Times, L.A. Times and The Wall Street Journal SWIFT reports put at risk our national security?
Yes 22% 227 votes
No 78% 803 votes
CNN has closed the poll or rigged it like their fellow rats do on election day.
Did anyone ever doubt?
If you install multiple browsers on your computers, often you can cast a vote for each browser. One for Internet Explorer, one for Netscape 8.X, one for Netscape 4.7X, one for Opera, etc.
Do you believe that The New York Times, L.A. Times and The Wall Street Journal SWIFT reports put at risk our national security?
Yes 19% 732 votes
No 81% 3095 votes
The federal statute on treason, 18 USC 2381, provides in relevant part: "Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States ... adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000."
Have Fox run the same survey and see how it turns out....
Yes 19% 732 votesWe don't need to be certain that security risks occurred, in order to know it was a bad idea to print the reports. If there was any chance that our security was being put at risk, the reports should not have been printed.
No 81% 3095 votes
Fact is it was the Times that outed the story. The WSJ hopped on the band wagon when it became known that the story was going to be broken. Not that they weren't acting opportunistically but, I find it hard to believe that Paul Gigot would have broken this story if the Times hadn't already committed to doing so. The LA Times is another story. They would release a damaging story in a heartbeat.
All the elite media in NY and Hollywood write and broadcast for each other.
They could care less about their country or its citizens.
Yes 19%
1546 votes
No 81%
6610 votes
The RATs are winning big time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.