[Paleo Conservative]

Does the average CNN viewer have rocks for brains?

78% Yes

22% No

[Diogenesis]

It is not changing even with a vote. Probably fixed.

[Cicero]

Here are the numbers. Let's see if anything changes:

Do you believe that The New York Times, L.A. Times and The Wall Street Journal SWIFT reports put at risk our national security?
Yes		22%	227 votes
No		78%	803 votes
Total: 1030 votes

[Lexington Green]

rigged, as always...

[eleni121]

Dobbs? I voted but my vote didn't count.

[Grampa Dave]

Do you believe that The New York Times, L.A. Times and The Wall Street Journal SWIFT reports put at risk our national security?

Yes 22% 227 votes

No 78% 803 votes

[digger48]

Do you believe that The New York Times, L.A. Times and The Wall Street Journal SWIFT reports put at risk our national security?

Yes 19% 732 votes

No 81% 3095 votes

[Screamname]

Like I said before; Follow the law...Have the trial... If found guilty, zap them like the bugs that they are.

The federal statute on treason, 18 USC 2381, provides in relevant part: "Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States ... adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000."

[syriacus]

Do you believe that The New York Times, L.A. Times and The Wall Street Journal SWIFT reports put at risk our national security?

Yes 19% 732 votes
No 81% 3095 votes

We don't need to be certain that security risks occurred, in order to know it was a bad idea to print the reports. If there was any chance that our security was being put at risk, the reports should not have been printed.