I do not like this either..... I really cannot believe someone would actually agree to do this.....there must have been a financial incentive
Next step, employees will be intestinated - see the film "Fortress" with Christopher Lambert.
This is the most significant freedom/liberty issue currently on the table.
Those who submit to this are leading humanity toward slavery.
And I'm not talking some kind of religious issue. I'm simply speaking to the obvious long-term results of such technology.
It will be abused. "Power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely."
This article is without the usual innuendos/word plays of a hoax article, so one is left to ask, "What's in a name?".
I wish these were in the 80's. I could of used them when I lived in Los Angeles with both of my ex-wives.
No, it will be termed 'mandatory compliance'. This is something for which there needs to be a Constitutional amendment. There will be too many ways to weasel around the 13th.
Anyone come at me with a RFID tag and I'll blow they're head off. Not me, not in a million years will I adopt the mark of the beast.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1574836/posts
The UN Plan for Your Mental Health (UNESCO)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1563271/posts
Healthy People 2010
Before Bill Clinton left office, he authorized 2001 an 84% increase in the government's investment in nanotechnology research and development, National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) http://clinton4.nara.gov/WH/New/html/20000121_4.html and made it a top priority.
* This governmental increase has been combined with non-governmental organizations (NGO) and grant programs. These NGOs have been creating partnerships with existing governmental agencies and masking initiatives as Federal and State grant reward programs. They are not.
* Here, at the CDC is an overview of what is called, Healthy People 2010 http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/otheract/hpdata2010/abouthp.htm .
* As you can see from www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/otheract/hpdata2010/abouthp.htm, the initiative is driven with 28 different categories. All of these categories have grant award programs that are awarding monies through various agencies to promote a healthy initiative program'. Some of the programs alone, sound harmless. When they are tied together though, they are disturbing.
* Former President Clinton's budget for his NATIONAL NANOTECHNOLOGY INITIATIVE is fueled by funding from the National Nanotechnology Initiative, National Science Foundation, National Institutes of Health, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Energy and the Department of Defense in combination with private and nonprofit funds from non-governmental organizations.
These funds now make available monies for grant projects for:
Focus Areas at a Glance (28)
* Access to Quality Health Services
* Arthritis, Osteoporosis and Chronic Back Conditions
* Cancer
* Chronic Kidney Disease
* Diabetes
* Disability and Secondary Conditions
* Educational and Community-Based Programs
* Environmental Health
* Family Planning
* Food Safety
* Health Communication
* Heart Disease and Stroke
* Immunizations and Infectious Diseases
* Nutrition and Overweight
* Injury and Violence Prevention
* Maternal, Infant, and Child Health
* Medical Product Safety
* Mental Health and Mental Disorders
* Occupational Safety and Health
* Oral Health
* Physical Activity and Fitness
* Public Health Infrastructure
* Respiratory Diseases
* Sexually Transmitted Diseases -STD
* Substance Abuse
* Tobacco Use
* Vision and Hearing
* An association, state, or company applies for the grants to fund these initiatives
* In turn they authorize a Freedom of Information Release to all their data. This is a sample of the data collected from a grant application. All the data requirements are the same, the only difference is the partnered agency that is acting as a liaison for relaying the data. Example, this one below is using the USDA as the partnered liaison. If this was a hospital application, it would say the CDC.
More: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1563271/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1573646/posts
How do you say No NAIS in Japanese?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1570042/posts
Safe and Secure Food Act of 2005
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1565481/posts
USDA steps up efforts to track livestock
http://nationalpropertyowners.org
National Property Owners
Full research sections on National Animal Identification System (NAIS)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1563271/posts
Healthy People 2010
Information on where the funding came from for NAIS
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1561077/posts
Animal Tagging and SCHOOL LUNCHES???
Information on some of the partners on these posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1564815/posts
Digital Angel and Microchip
Info on the technology that will be used for the tagging
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1549425/posts
German Proposes Tagging Islamic Militants
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1339911/posts
Parents Protest School Mandate That Students Wear Radio ID Tags
Posted by BenLurkin
On News/Activism 02/09/2005 8:29:20 PM EST · 152 replies · 1,792+ views
Associated Press ^ | -02-09-05 1927EST | Lisa Leff
SUTTER, Calif. (AP) - The only grade school in this rural town is requiring students to wear radio frequency identification badges that can track their every move. Some parents are outraged, fearing it will rob their children of privacy. The badges introduced at Brittan Elementary School on Jan. 18 rely on the same radio frequency and scanner technology that companies use to track livestock and product inventory. While similar devices are being tested at several schools in Japan so parents can know when their children arrive and leave, Brittan appears to be the first U.S. school district to embrace such...
How is the state expected to be able to inventory its property?
Creepiness ping.
..
..
ping
The sign of things to come.
I always enjoyed that movie for some reason...Looking forward to personalized billboards next!
This is on the same path Social Security numbers is on today. When first presented and promised it would "NEVER" be used as a means to locate and identify people but that lie was duly ignored and now we have it as a National Identifier. As technology advances it will just follow in the same vein more lies and more worthless promises and there will be a unending stream of ignorant dupes willing to agree who stand inviolate of Biblical Prophecy. This should surprise nobody who reads and keeps up with the times we live in.
That's just creepy
Mark
Creeping incrementalism. What is not compulsory today will be compulsory tomorrow - next week - next year. However long it takes to make the idea acceptable.