No, it will be termed 'mandatory compliance'. This is something for which there needs to be a Constitutional amendment. There will be too many ways to weasel around the 13th.
"No, it will be termed 'mandatory compliance'. This is something for which there needs to be a Constitutional amendment. There will be too many ways to weasel around the 13th."
Yeah, people will find all kinds of excuses (concienteous objection, etc.) to not comply. This has to be absolutely obligatory for ALL US citizens, then there will be no confusion - and HUGE advantages on the battlefield, reduces friendly fire incidents dramatically they say. Anyway, be prepared for the ACLU to find LOTS of BS excuses why people should not submit, but let's separate the wheat from the chaff ONCE AND FOR ALL.
"The technology’s defenders say it is acceptable as long as it is not compulsory."
And the guy that developed it said that it would only be used in animals, never in humans, too. Oops! Guess we had mission creep once again.