Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US sides with Muslims in cartoon dispute
Yahoo! News ^ | 02/03/06 | Yahoo! News

Posted on 02/03/2006 9:04:55 AM PST by thesharkboy

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Washington on Friday condemned caricatures in European newspapers of Islam's Prophet Mohammad, siding with Muslims who are outraged that the publications put press freedom over respect for religion.

"These cartoons are indeed offensive to the belief of Muslims," State Department spokesman Kurtis Cooper said in answer to a question.

"We all fully recognize and respect freedom of the press and expression but it must be coupled with press responsibility. Inciting religious or ethnic hatreds in this manner is not acceptable."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: aarielsharonism; absolutebushism; absurd; americandhimmies; americanjihad; appeasers; barfalert; breaking; brokebackstatedept; bungling; cartoons; christianhypocrites; dhimmi; dhimmitude; dim; dos; empty; fakers; foolish; gofigure; govwatch; incompetent; ineffective; islam; jihad; laughable; libertarians; meaningless; muslims; notbright; ofnouse; ofnovalue; pansyazzofficials; pathetic; ridiculous; rinowatch; selfimportant; statedepartment; trop; useless; weak; worsethanthefrench; worthless; xistianhypocrites
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 341-356 next last
To: thesharkboy
There's a bunch of hypocrisy in the Muslim reaction. Islam condemns all makings of any image of anything created by God, not just those images made by non-Muslims. Yet they proudly display the crescent moon (Was the moon not created by God?), and for decades they've burned and beaten replicas of world leaders on their streets as the Muslim throngs cheer. The incident with the cartoons have brought out the hypocrites of Islam.
281 posted on 02/03/2006 2:34:22 PM PST by backtothestreets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thesharkboy
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2006\02\04\story_4-2-2006_pg7_6

i was just reading this...it sort of makes sense now. the US doesn't really want to tick off the muslims that are actually helping us...in other words, like one of the posters said somewhere...lol Justin Higgins was doing what he is supposed to do, being diplomatic. imagine if the Iraqi's that are helping in Iraq thought the US was okay with mocking their God. i really don't think it would help the situation there at all.

282 posted on 02/03/2006 3:08:43 PM PST by ferri (Be Politically Incorrect: Support the Constitution!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Barney Gumble

ooh good one

any artists here?

i'd love to send that one around!!

i'd even print it and send it with "real" letters to all my reps.

this is crazy -- the U.S. has lost its mind. Bush spoke warmly of IslUm again in his SOTU address and made me feel like vomiting.


283 posted on 02/03/2006 3:18:01 PM PST by kpp_kpp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: thesharkboy

BARF...


284 posted on 02/03/2006 3:18:41 PM PST by Cornpone (Who Dares Wins -- Defame Islam Today -- Tell the Truth About Mohammed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thesharkboy

They should of.. if they didn't they are hypocrites.

I don't mind the State Dept saying they are offensive... espically when they put the respect of freedom of press and speech first.

You can say what you want.. but be thoughtful of what you say.

That's a good message to send. But it should go for the Jews and the Christians as much as it does for the Muslims.


285 posted on 02/03/2006 3:37:19 PM PST by Almondjoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
As long as the State Department condemns cartoons in the Arab media that belittles Judaism, Christianity, Hinduism, etc. I am in agreement. But I don't see that happening, unfortunately. Therefore, I was a bit put out by their statement. Islam needs to be held accountable for their actions and the societies they have created. That is not happening.
286 posted on 02/03/2006 3:58:28 PM PST by Chgogal (CNN, the network that enabled Saddam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal

Do you really want to put our soldiers in Iraq in more harms way, and do you really want to blow our fragile relationship with our new Iraqi allies, all to come to the defense of the arrogant ingrates of Europe?


287 posted on 02/03/2006 4:04:02 PM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

WE could have remained silent, Sam the Man. No one was asking for our opinion. We volunteered unnecessarily.


288 posted on 02/03/2006 4:06:30 PM PST by Chgogal (CNN, the network that enabled Saddam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies]

To: thesharkboy
My reaction to today's State Department comment on the cartoons is the same as President Bush's "religion of peace" characterization.

The U.S. government's role is to protect and further the interests of the United States and its people, not to fight a religious war. This distinction is particularly important as the U.S. is trying to establish a peaceful and modern constitutional democracy in Iraq, a country that is virtually 100% Muslim. The U.S. government cannot remain silent on the topic, since all nations with predominate Muslim populations are telling them that U.S. support on the issue is their top priority.

We may correctly observe that Islam is a violent political movement masquerading as a religion. Our government cannot do so, at least not in our lifetimes.

289 posted on 02/03/2006 4:07:23 PM PST by Praxeologue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beowulf

Lame @ss State Department PC pansies.


290 posted on 02/03/2006 4:08:39 PM PST by steelyourfaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thesharkboy

Screw you Kurtis Cooper.


291 posted on 02/03/2006 4:10:03 PM PST by Modok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal
WE could have remained silent, Sam the Man. No one was asking for our opinion. We volunteered unnecessarily.
Hey. We have our new friends in Iraq to think of and all of our SOLDIERS who are out in the field working with them. Have you FORGOTTEN them?

Iraq is where the real battle line is being drawn. Let the euroweenies defend their own damned cartoons.

292 posted on 02/03/2006 4:10:14 PM PST by samtheman (Islam: The Religion of Ecited Delirium)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]

To: thesharkboy

Is this the Rice led State Department?


293 posted on 02/03/2006 4:10:50 PM PST by Modok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

No, I have not forgotten. I send packages every week.

May I refer you to the following essay by VDH?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1570861/posts


294 posted on 02/03/2006 4:12:25 PM PST by Chgogal (CNN, the network that enabled Saddam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: Modok

Yes. This is the Rice-led State Department supporting our troops in Iraq, not looking for fights in Europe.


295 posted on 02/03/2006 4:12:57 PM PST by samtheman (Islam: The Religion of Excited Delirium)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal
I send packages every week.
That's great. Then I hope you think about what I'm saying. We want a lot of Iraqi Muslims on our side right now, don't we? They're working arm and arm with our troops right now, aren't they? We should be picking our battles carefully right now, shouldn't we?
296 posted on 02/03/2006 4:14:13 PM PST by samtheman (Islam: The Religion of Excited Delirium)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

LOL


297 posted on 02/03/2006 4:14:47 PM PST by Modok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

With regard to satirical cartoons in a privately owned Danish or French newspaper, that has nothing to do with the foreign or domestic policies of the governments in question. Is America anti-Christian because of blasphemous art in the public arena? This is just an excuse for radical Muslims to agitate against the Western democracies. Shame on the State Department for caving in to terrorist supporters.


298 posted on 02/03/2006 4:17:16 PM PST by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: thesharkboy

Islam is a Satanic Cult!! The State blew this one.

Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters


299 posted on 02/03/2006 4:17:41 PM PST by bray (Jack Bauer '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

No, Muslims will never be on our side because we are infidels and need to be either converted or put to death.


300 posted on 02/03/2006 4:19:08 PM PST by Chgogal (CNN, the network that enabled Saddam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 341-356 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson