Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Samuel Alito ~ Senate Judiciary Hearing [LIVE THREAD] (Day-4)
Senate Judiciary ^ | 1-12-06 | Senate Judiciary

Posted on 01/12/2006 5:14:27 AM PST by OXENinFLA

Day 4: Hearing Resumes

This morning, Senators will question Judge Alito during a third round. They will then go into a closed session, to review the FBI background investigation on the Supreme Court nominee. Outside witnesses may be called to testify this afternoon, as well as the American Bar Association, to discuss its recommendations.

THURS., 9:00AM ET, C-SPAN

Live Links

C-span

Judiciary LIVE LINK

FEDNET

CapitolHearings.org


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: 109th; alito; alitoakbar; alitohearings; alitorulz; babykilling; bidenisamoron; bush2rats0; clangingcymbals; demsareduds; emptybarrels; feingoldstinks; feinsteinreeks; judicialnominees; judiciary; kennedysucks; penumbra; scotus; senate; super; superdeduper; superduper; superduperduper; welldecided
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,181-1,2001,201-1,2201,221-1,240 ... 3,401-3,406 next last
To: King David

I called the arrogant lout's office this morning and really let rip. Among other things I demanded that he reveal the list of individuals and interest groups he had colluded with in preparing for these hearings.


1,201 posted on 01/12/2006 8:50:11 AM PST by Boston Tea Party
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1181 | View Replies]

To: andyland

Got it and understand now..Thank you..


1,202 posted on 01/12/2006 8:50:14 AM PST by Beth528
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1156 | View Replies]

To: King David

How is he ever going to prove that? Who cares anyway? There is no law against consulting with an attorney.


1,203 posted on 01/12/2006 8:50:19 AM PST by conservativebabe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1181 | View Replies]

Comment #1,204 Removed by Moderator

To: saveliberty

why is he still asking questions?? We already know that Feind-gold isn't going to vote for him

Does he love his own voice that much?


1,205 posted on 01/12/2006 8:50:52 AM PST by newnhdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1193 | View Replies]

To: Peach
A neighbor called and I missed all of Feinstein's questions; anything big I've missed? Big? Nah, just Feinstein's hair. No one really knows where she was going with her mumbling. Grassley did a nice job.
1,206 posted on 01/12/2006 8:50:53 AM PST by daybreakcoming (May God bless those who enter the valley of the shadow of death so that we may see the light of day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1150 | View Replies]

To: Lizarde

Watch Alito's fingers.....he has his hands clapsed, but his fingers are working like crazy when he talks


1,207 posted on 01/12/2006 8:50:55 AM PST by Loud Mime (Republicans protect Americans from terrorists, Democrats protect terrorists from Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1192 | View Replies]

To: Dianna

He's talking about NSA eavesdropping and FISA


1,208 posted on 01/12/2006 8:51:08 AM PST by guinnessman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1200 | View Replies]

To: King David

Russty is more concerned with hearing his on voice than hearing what Alito has to say.


1,209 posted on 01/12/2006 8:51:45 AM PST by JFC (W, I am with YA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1181 | View Replies]

To: Beth528
Each RAT member of the committee has an extremist group to appease.

DiFi's is the pro-death crowd.

1,210 posted on 01/12/2006 8:51:47 AM PST by ohioWfan (PROUD Mom of an Iraq War VET! THANKS, son!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1194 | View Replies]

To: All

He's troubled and concerned. Can we add a puzzled to that?


1,211 posted on 01/12/2006 8:51:48 AM PST by ilovew ("We are living through a watershed moment in the story of freedom." GWB 12-14-05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1208 | View Replies]

To: Beth528

Thanks - I meant it as a funny comment. I guess I didn't do a good enough job. :)

Check out this website I found - it is really good!

www.rightofgray.blogspot.com


1,212 posted on 01/12/2006 8:51:58 AM PST by andyland (Go Wolfpack!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1194 | View Replies]

To: auboy

Jes he does


1,213 posted on 01/12/2006 8:52:02 AM PST by saveliberty (Proud to be Head Snowflake, Bushbot and a new member of Sam's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1195 | View Replies]

To: King David
Feingold is "concerned" that Alito actually PREPARED for these meetings by lawyers?

Oh, horrors of horrors, some of those attorneys may actually have been involved in defending the President's position on the NSA electronic eavesdropping.
1,214 posted on 01/12/2006 8:52:30 AM PST by PerConPat (A politician is an animal which can sit on a fence and yet keep both ears to the ground.-- Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1181 | View Replies]

To: Dianna

Keep in mind that the Executive Branch is of EQUAL POWER with the Legislative.

The executive has special powers, even in time of war. In the Federalist Papers you can find continual references that the survival of the republic is of utmost of importance.

Feingold wants Alito to side with Bush's use of power.


1,215 posted on 01/12/2006 8:52:42 AM PST by Loud Mime (Republicans protect Americans from terrorists, Democrats protect terrorists from Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1200 | View Replies]

To: Loud Mime
I think it is safe to say that Feingold doesn't have a clue of what the Constitution says either

He also doesn't have a clue in how to present the facts of a case correctly either

Feinstgold keeps saying criminal .. and that the President is spying on Americans

He seems to forget the part about Americans receiving phone calls from KNOWN terrorists that want to MURDER Americans

1,216 posted on 01/12/2006 8:52:43 AM PST by Mo1 (Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists.. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1189 | View Replies]

To: guinnessman

Alito can say "Yes I want to impeach Bush" and Feind-Gold wouldn't vote for him
Why is ths jerk torturing him with these questions.


1,217 posted on 01/12/2006 8:52:45 AM PST by newnhdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1208 | View Replies]

To: Loud Mime
Since the 17th Amendment passed, the Senate has steadily declined into a chamber infected with the disease of party spirit and fundraising.

...in other words, the Senate has become a house of political party prostitutes.

1,218 posted on 01/12/2006 8:53:04 AM PST by Boston Blackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1140 | View Replies]

To: saveliberty

Feingold pushing hard for IMPEACHMENT


1,219 posted on 01/12/2006 8:53:25 AM PST by stocksthatgoup ("It's inexcusable to tell us to 'connect the dots' and not give us the tools to do so." G W Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1213 | View Replies]

To: guinnessman
IMHO, "Steel Seizure" is distinguishable from the NSA situation.

HUGELY distinguishable! I figure there is terrirotry between FISA and what the President is doing, and as even Jean Harman says, either the law has to change (not a bad idea), or some other rationale needs to be developed lest the government encroach on the people's right under the 4th. It's a sticky issue, but Congress can address it. RIght now they are playing politics with it, and it's going to be a loser for them at that level.

It's a very serious matter, but I really disresepct the fact that the DEMs are trying to flesh the issue out in this venue. Sure, discuss the process and make sure the judge can see arguments on both sides, then get on.

Others have hit on this, and what the DEMs are doing is using this venue for what they think will be political advantage. I'm convinced Alito will balance the rights of the people and the powers of the branches of government quite well.

Alito - admits this is an awesome isuue, sometimes even not justiciable. Alito is giving answers that are so good and so forthcoming - awesome, just awesome.

And Feingold admits this issue is really outside the bounds of this hearing. Russ, if it's not justiciable, all it means is "it's up to Congress and the President to set the boundary." I doubt that will be the case where an individual has a personal 4th amendment claim, BTW.

1,220 posted on 01/12/2006 8:53:37 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1159 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,181-1,2001,201-1,2201,221-1,240 ... 3,401-3,406 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson