Posted on 01/06/2006 7:14:48 PM PST by LSUfan
If anyone has any doubt about the kind of nuclear work Iran has been doing for the past 18 years, it must be a case of naiveté compounded by gullibility. Nor should there be any uncertainty about what Iran's mullahocracy would do with a nuclear weapon.
(Excerpt) Read more at spacewar.com ...
The document, says the Guardian, lists scores of Iranian companies and institutions involved in the arms race. It also details Tehran's determination to perfect a ballistic missile capable of delivering warheads far beyond its borders. Iran is trying to extend the range of its Shahab-3 missile, which has a range of almost 1,000 miles, capable of reaching Israel."
Now, Mahmoud may just be absolutely crazy- which is a distinct possibility- or his rhetoric and recent actions may be just what I've described, an attempt to force the US's- or perhaps even better Israel's- hand and unleash limited military action.
If we do end up going to war with Iran I hope we fight a total war like we did against Japan.We should hit them with everything we have and only stop when there's nothing left of their military and nobody left to fight for it.
I can't tell which one is uglier.
I just want you to know that suicide bomber photo never left my head all day - and I wonder who was going to write his family a 25K check, Saudia Arabia or Iran?
So who is running the pool? I'll say Jan, 2007.
"I suspect one reason may be that President Bush knows the rats will skewer him."
The RATs would skewer President Bush if he were to single-handedly wipe out world poverty, ignorance and disease tomorrow morning. Of that I have no doubts.
"On the other hand, as with Iraq, I like to think he will do what is right. For all we know, he could be talking with the congressional leadership behind the scene for just such an eventuality."
I have never doubted for a moment that President Bush will do what is necessary to eliminate any threat to our country and our way of life, with the possible exception of our border situation with our "neighbors" to the south. Sooner or later he is going to be compelled to address that issue with a high degree of seriousness.
That picture defines the word naiveté, and exemplifies the cheap political expediency and cowardice of the Clinton administration. That one picture says as much as a one-hour speech on the subject of naiveté. It is a perfect example of human folly and a climactic moment in the history of naive human behavior. In the history of naiveté, that picture is a tour de force.
When its all over, the US Marine and SOG snipers will have their stories told.
If people knew that story, they would know one thing: We have NOT lost.
The bombers do not control the streets of Iraq. We do. I hope an Al Jezeera reporter saw that photo too while it was up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.