1 posted on
12/25/2005 12:31:53 PM PST by
Neville72
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
To: Neville72
King William sounds much better - skip over Charles altogether.
2 posted on
12/25/2005 12:33:43 PM PST by
DTogo
(Merry CHRISTmas, and a healthy & happy New Year!)
To: Neville72
Who needs another King George? He should cut to the chase and choose the name Dubya.
3 posted on
12/25/2005 12:34:48 PM PST by
inkling
To: Neville72; MadIvan; Cacique; rmlew
I've said it once and I'll say it again, if only the Brits would do to the Charles and the rest of the House of Windsor/Saxe Coburg/Hannover what they did to Charles I:
4 posted on
12/25/2005 12:34:52 PM PST by
Clemenza
(Smartest words ever written by a Communist: "Show me the way to the next Whiskey Bar")
To: Neville72
What a curse to be royalty these days. I almost feel sorry for him, except he's a Moonbat too.
5 posted on
12/25/2005 12:35:01 PM PST by
Fenris6
(3 Purple Hearts in 4 months w/o missing a day of work? He's either John Rambo or a Fraud)
To: Neville72
Wasn't it a King George who lost the colonies?
Or is Charles looking to honor President Bush?
7 posted on
12/25/2005 12:35:29 PM PST by
Cyclops08
To: Neville72
11 posted on
12/25/2005 12:37:32 PM PST by
RichInOC
(Anybody who cheats on Diana Spencer with Camilla Parker-Bowles is too stupid to be king.)
To: Neville72
OTOH, "The Madness of King George, Part II" will be a ready-made title.
To: Neville72
14 posted on
12/25/2005 12:38:51 PM PST by
jigsaw
(God Bless Our Troops!)
To: Neville72
Actually, Edward IX is not my first choice, but Kimberly-Clark would probably object to Tampax I.
15 posted on
12/25/2005 12:39:53 PM PST by
RichInOC
(Anybody who cheats on Diana Spencer with Camilla Parker-Bowles is too stupid to be king.)
To: Neville72
17 posted on
12/25/2005 12:40:20 PM PST by
ncountylee
(Dead terrorists smell like victory)
To: Neville72
Well, since Ratzie didn't take the name George Ringo I as his papal name, I suppose that alternative is still open to the British monarchy....
To: Neville72
What's the matter with Arthur?21 posted on
12/25/2005 12:43:48 PM PST by
socal_parrot
(Fröliche Weinachten)
To: Neville72
...and they will forever refer to him as: "the king known as George."
I can't wait for his Purple Reign album.
To: Neville72
QEII is going to give strict instructions to keep her on whatever life support is possible until Chuckie assumes room temperature.
To: Neville72
I would say he is wall on his way to being a Henry.
Henry IX....needs to gather up 4 or 5 more wives tho to beat his presecessor.
26 posted on
12/25/2005 12:59:08 PM PST by
bert
(Franks for President '08)
To: Neville72
To: Neville72
ARTHUR
Well ... I AM king.
DENNIS
Oh, very nice. King, eh! I expect you've got a palace and fine clothes and courtiers and plenty of food. And how d'you get that? By exploiting the workers! By hanging on to outdated imperialist dogma which perpetuates the social and economic differences in our society!
To: Neville72
To: Neville72
From Prince to King Foppy. Grand!
32 posted on
12/25/2005 1:12:44 PM PST by
onedoug
To: Neville72
I guess "Vegan Leftist Loonie Adulterer" was already taken.
33 posted on
12/25/2005 1:15:23 PM PST by
HereInTheHeartland
(Never bring a knife to a gun fight, or a Democrat to do serious work...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson