Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Neville72

Actually, Edward IX is not my first choice, but Kimberly-Clark would probably object to Tampax I.


15 posted on 12/25/2005 12:39:53 PM PST by RichInOC (Anybody who cheats on Diana Spencer with Camilla Parker-Bowles is too stupid to be king.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RichInOC

...ick...Procter and Gamble would, anyway.


19 posted on 12/25/2005 12:40:50 PM PST by RichInOC (Anybody who cheats on Diana Spencer with Camilla Parker-Bowles is too stupid to be king.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: RichInOC

Yes. Tampax I. Quite.


29 posted on 12/25/2005 1:06:06 PM PST by Hank Rearden (Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: RichInOC
Kimberly-Clark would probably object to Tampax I.

HA! It would be a great publicity coup.

I'm disgusted with chuck and cammy. They have no purpose for England, as I see it. The respected Queen and the boys seem to be a great income-maker for all of the markets in England. WHO would want a tea towel with chuck and cammy on it? --Maybe printed on toilet paper; but how much TP can a person use?

(That's rhetorical: The amount is not pertinent. Aw, heck! Compute if you'd like!)

107 posted on 12/25/2005 4:29:19 PM PST by bannie (The government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend upon the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: RichInOC; Thinkin' Gal

How about the Super Plus King? That would be a good 'fit'.


150 posted on 12/25/2005 8:39:20 PM PST by Lijahsbubbe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson