Posted on 12/25/2005 12:31:52 PM PST by Neville72
THE Prince of Wales has discussed rejecting the title Charles III when he becomes King to avoid unhappy associations with some of the bloodiest periods in the monarchys history. The Princes favourite alternative name is George VII, in honour of his grandfather one of the best-loved monarchs of the past century.
The Times has spoken to two trusted friends of the Prince, who both said that the change to George has been considered seriously. One said: There have been many conversations with the Prince about this. It is an assumption among us all that it will happen.
The name Charles is tinged with so much sadness.
The other source said: They [the Royal Family] will decide at the time, but he has talked about George.
The name Charles is regarded as jinxed in some royal circles. Charles I was the only monarch to be executed. His beheading in 1649, after the English Civil War, brought about the short-lived republic under Oliver Cromwell.
Charles II, the son of Charles I, returned to the throne at the Restoration in 1660, after spending 18 years in exile overseas, but was mocked as the Merry Monarch because he had a string of mistresses, including the orange-seller Nell Gwyn.
There is sensitivity in royal circles about Bonnie Prince Charlie, the Young Pretender, who was known as Charles III by his supporters. Despite his defeat at the Battle of Culloden in 1746, he is still seen as a Scottish romantic figure.
The Prince of Wales, who was christened Charles Philip Arthur George, is a passionate supporter of the Union and spends most of his holidays in Scotland.
A Clarence House spokesman said that there had been long-term thinking about the Coronation, but that nothing had been discussed officially about changing the Princes title. He added: One of the questions that we have asked is what he will be known as. The decision will be taken at the time.
When he ascends the throne the new King will convene an Accession Council a meeting of the full Privy Council.
It is the only time that the full Privy Council, which includes ministers and senior bishops, meets. It will then be decreed by the council what title the new King will take.
Were the Prince to change his formal, or regnal, title he would be following a tradition begun by Queen Victoria in 1837, who was born Alexandrina. Four of the past six monarchs have changed their name, including George VI, the father of the Queen, who was christened Prince Albert.
Prince Charles was only 4 when his grandfather died but he was very close to his grandmother, the late Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother.
The issue of changing the regnal title has been raised at Clarence House but the name is not yet part of any formal planning for the sucession.
One senior Royal official said that there had been an assumption in informal talks about the accession that the Prince would keep the name Charles.
Patrick Cracroft-Brennan, a genealogist from Cracrofts Peerage, said: There has been a tradition over the last century for the regnal title to be different to the christian name. The change would make sense.
Monarchs called Charles have not had much luck. One was beheaded, one was in exile, and one was a pretender to the throne.
While the Prince of Wales is known throughout the world as Charles, there is enormous goodwill to the name George. George VI was an outstanding and popular King who took over in the immediate aftermath of the abdication crisis and rallied his people during the war. King George and Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother were wonderful. I think George VII and Queen Camilla sound wonderful, too.
When the marriage was announced of the Prince of Wales and Camilla Parker Bowles, Clarence House said that she would be known as the Duchess of Cornwall after the marriage and that it was intended that she would be known as Princess Consort when the Prince of Wales succeeds his mother to the throne.
If, however, public opinion were amenable, she could yet become Queen Camilla. Significantly, there was no such announcement about the title by which her husband would be known
I can't wait for his Purple Reign album.
"On second thought, let us not go to Buckingham. 'Tis a silly place."
QEII is going to give strict instructions to keep her on whatever life support is possible until Chuckie assumes room temperature.
I would say he is wall on his way to being a Henry.
Henry IX....needs to gather up 4 or 5 more wives tho to beat his presecessor.
Charles seems to fit this twit perfectly, if he ever makes it to the thrown. And guess what, if he ever makes it to the thrown and has bad things happen, all the superstitious commentators will say that he was really another jinxed Charles.
What he should do is abdicate before become King.
Ethelred The Unready II
Yes. Tampax I. Quite.
ARTHUR
Well ... I AM king.
DENNIS
Oh, very nice. King, eh! I expect you've got a palace and fine clothes and courtiers and plenty of food. And how d'you get that? By exploiting the workers! By hanging on to outdated imperialist dogma which perpetuates the social and economic differences in our society!
King Don
From Prince to King Foppy. Grand!
I guess "Vegan Leftist Loonie Adulterer" was already taken.
I consider this decision to be premature. He may never become king.
I also consider it tacky and insensitive on his part to be considering his future king name (should it happen) when his mother is still alive.
Charles III, George VII, whatever. They'll still have a dunderhead for a King. Poor Brits.
THAT reminds me of "Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy"--
"The hereditary Emperor is nearly dead and has been for many centuries. In the last moments of his dying coma he was locked in a stasis field which keeps him in a state of perpetual unchangingness. All his heirs are now long dead, and this means that without any drastic political upheaval, power has simply and effectively moved a
rung or two down the ladder.... "
Change his name to Mohammed. That's the way Britain is going these days and Charles sure has good feelings for islamikazis.
Sounds to me like Chuck has a bad case of Bush envy.
Hence, my original comment that he should be skipped over in favor of William.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.