Posted on 11/16/2005 11:46:35 AM PST by nycfree
November 16, 2005 -- ALBANY Republican Senate hopeful Jeanine Pirro refused yesterday to back President Bush's selection of Samuel Alito for the Supreme Court, in part because of Alito's past anti-abortion views. The refusal by Pirro, who backs abortion rights, drew a quick condemnation from state Conservative Party leader Mike Long, whose support Pirro has been aggressively seeking. "I'm assuming Jeanine supported Bush for president and, therefore, she should be out front supporting the president's nominee for the Supreme Court because we know Hillary Clinton is going to vote 'no,' " Long said. Pirro, the outgoing Westchester district attorney, wants to "wait and see the Senate confirmation hearings" before making up her mind on Alito, said spokeswoman Andrea Tantaros. "She wants to hear the tough questions, and she wants to hear the answers on a wide spectrum of issues," Tantaros said.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
Stick a fork in her. She's done.
Lincoln Chaffee in Drag
What does it matter what she thinks? His confirmation vote will be WAY before she would ever have any chance of setting foot in the Senate.
Which "serious candidate" would you suggest that the Republicans run in NY against Hitlery?
Suggest a winning strategy for me, please! I'll be happy to listen, and work to follow through when you give your winning plan!
I'm from NJ. Whitman (RINO) wasn't much of a difference from Florio or what will be Gov Corzine.
RINOs are very annoying, but they are far less destructive to the republic than the socialist Demodogs are.
I didn't like Whitman much at all, but she managed to keep NJ under some control for a period of time. Nevertheless, NJ was a little better off when she was governor - yet I know that's not a great claim.
I thought it was an error in judgement that she was put on the Cabinet. The EPA was somewhat better of under her than the 'Toon Sec, at least, but she was dangerous there overall. The best part of her being on the Cabinet is that her relative failure there virtually removed her from influence on the national scene, and as a former "R woman governor", she was pretty dangerous for a while. Now I think she's relatively neutered.
Or how about:
"I'm a damn stinkin' commie liberal and I worship abortion and I hate conservatives so I would never back an evil white man like Alito." Or is that pretty much what she actually said?
Say it loud and proud Jeanine! You're a left-wing wacko, embrace your destiny!
Paging Mr. Spencer.
The once iconic John Vliet Lindsay would have a hard choice deciding between Hillary and Pirro, but I think he would go with his heart and Hillary if he could!
There is NO WAY to "control the RINOs". They are doing PRECISELY what their constituents want them to do. They will get elected over and over and over again - or they will be replaced by a socialist Demodog. They'll never be replaced by a "conservative" in the mold of Kyl, or Cornyn, or even someone like Hatch. No "libertarian" will ever dislodge them. The best that can be hoped for in most of the NorthEast races, and several other states, is to elect RINOs who will at least sometimes vote moderately conservative.
You'll never, ever get a 100%er, or even an 80%er. You just might be able to get a candidate elected who votes with you most of the time on welfare reforms, and pro-2ndA - but forget a true down-the-line conservative from these Blue States. If you can get enough of these RINOs replacing the 0% Demodogs, conservative legislation can be passed using shifting coalitions of the RINOs. That is the only hope. That is how any of the progress that has been since Reagan has occurred.
We need more RINOs in the Senate, replacing Blue State Demodog Senators. That, added to a few more conservative credentialed Senators from the Red States who have saddled themselves with incumbent Demodog Senators, will change the makeup of legislation radically. We're close to accomplishing that goal, but not quite there yet...
Please educate me: those "full slates of candidates" in NYState have resulted in exactly how many conservatives elected?
Please educate me how many terms the last Conservative Party Senator served, and how successful his election was when he didn't have the liberal vote split between two NY liberals.
Please further research for me: how many RINOs have been replaced by a 0% Demodog - full blooded liberal as a result of the self destructive desire of "true conservatives"?
Snowe and Collins depress me, but at least they vote with the Republican leadership half the time. [Chaffee doesn't make that mark and should be dropped. McCain should be dropped for other reasons.]
Future SAT Question:
Jeanine Pirro is to the Republican Party as:
a. Ted Kennedy is to AA;
b. Zell Miller is to the Democratic Party;
c. Paris Hilton is to any party;
d. Circle is to square;
e. All of the above;
f. None of the above.
Look! One of those evil "unelectable" NY politicians!
U.S. Senator Al D'Amato
(Republican/Conservative/Right-to-Life--NY)
Served: 1981-1999
oookaaay .... thank you Mrs Pirro ....
NEXT CANDIDATE, PLEASE!
A few points. Al D'Amato represented New York for almost 20 years. Santorum has represented Pennsylvania for 12. Many swing states can and do elect Republicans who could but in some cases don't act as conservatives. eg. Both senators from Maine are RINOs, but they would get reelected even if they were more conservative.
"but forget a true down-the-line conservative from these Blue States."
The exceptions, like Santorum, we should take extra effort to keep!
It is distressingly hard to dislodge some very bad liberal senators from blue states, but the solution is not running weak candidates just because they are mods. Conservatives often run better campaigns that energize based voters because they run sharper campaigns. A candidate that runs a forthright campaign on issues like taxes and spending and national security and family can indeed win even in the northeast. The trick is winning the swing vote without depressing the base.
The WRONG answer is to assume a wimpy moderate position is the answer. It's also the wrong answer to come out as a right-winger that will get pegged in a way to lose the the swing vote.
The RIGHT answer is to run the kind of campaign that Norm Coleman ran, where he both won swing voters and got the cosnrvative base energized. It's not easy but it is doable with the right, energetic candidates... mainstream conservatives can be winning candidates, even in New York.
Pirro is a disheartening disaster. We need SOMEONE good on the top of the ticket in New York in 2006 (Governor or Senator) or the Democrats will take back the State Senate. The first act of an all-Democrat legislator with a Democrat governor: a $4 billion tax hike to fund the Campaign for Equity lawsuit to dump more money into NYC schools.
Great answer!
C'mon right up here to NY, locate that candidate, and run that winning campaign you're describing! I'll be happy to help!
As of now, I'd be more than excited about RINO Pirro defeating Hitlery even if she ended up voting like Collins.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.