Skip to comments.
US suspends 'war on terror' trials after court ruling
Yahoo News ^
| 11/15/05
Posted on 11/15/2005 3:22:43 PM PST by Valin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-152 next last
1
posted on
11/15/2005 3:22:46 PM PST
by
Valin
To: Valin
Heck, why have trials and find out who's guilty when you can just keep punishing innocent and guilty together!
2
posted on
11/15/2005 3:24:03 PM PST
by
Gondring
(I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
To: Valin
I think 90% of Federal Judges should be sent down to Guantanamo, and locked up permanently.
3
posted on
11/15/2005 3:25:58 PM PST
by
yarddog
To: Valin
good grief ... what ever happened to separate but EQUAL branches of government.
the court, nor the congress, has any say in how the military treat it's prisoners of war.
To: Valin
Kotelly ruled that the Hicks trial be suspended ahead of an anticipated ruling by the US Supreme Court on the legality of the special military tribunals set up after the September 11, 2001 attacks.Huh??? Guess all those trials of the Nazi's for war crimes wouldn't happen in today's world?? An I missing something or is this BS like I think it is?
5
posted on
11/15/2005 3:27:50 PM PST
by
StarCMC
(Old Sarge is my hero...doing it right in Iraq! Vaya con Dios, Sarge.)
To: Valin
OK, so is Justice-pending Alito going to be seated in time to rule on this? Or will the Dems try and keep Sandra Day alive for this vote from the SC?
6
posted on
11/15/2005 3:29:43 PM PST
by
rhombus
To: Valin
Judge K-K is a Clinton appointee, 1997
7
posted on
11/15/2005 3:30:43 PM PST
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: StarCMC
"Guess all those trials of the Nazi's for war crimes wouldn't happen in today's world??"
Now, now. They were victims too. It is important to society to reach out to them and others among the less fortunate, those who weren't born with a silver spoon in their mouth, who haven't won life's lottery. We should celebrate their diversity and strive to learn from their alternative world-view, don't you think? That is a much more enlightened approach than brute punishment.
To: Valin
...which have been condemned by civil legal groups and even many of the military lawyers defending the detainees.OMG! Even the defense attorneys want their clients to get a better deal! If that's what the defense attorneys argue then it must be a good idea -- at least that's how the logic works with this writer.
Seriously, this is a pretty lousy piece of "news" writing.
9
posted on
11/15/2005 3:45:51 PM PST
by
68skylark
To: Valin
The courts can't make up their minds.
To: yarddog
"I think 90% of Federal Judges should be sent down to Guantanamo, and locked up permanently."
...and take the Senate with them.
To: RightOnTheLeftCoast
don't you think? Well, since you asked.... No. LOL! I say kill 'em all and let God sort 'em out.
In the words of Toby and Willie....
"Justice is the one thing
You should always find
You gotta saddle up your boys
You gotta draw a hard line.
When the gunsmoke settles
Sing a victory song
And we'll all meet back at the local saloon
Singin' whiskey for my men,
Beer for my horses."
12
posted on
11/15/2005 3:49:09 PM PST
by
StarCMC
(Old Sarge is my hero...doing it right in Iraq! Vaya con Dios, Sarge.)
To: Arrowhead1952; txradioguy; MoJo2001; 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub; Bahbah; LUV W; AZamericonnie; ...
This one has me seething....Ping
13
posted on
11/15/2005 3:50:50 PM PST
by
StarCMC
(Old Sarge is my hero...doing it right in Iraq! Vaya con Dios, Sarge.)
To: Valin
Execute and then try them. If found innocent in the trial they can be exonerated and a apology given.Hee hee hee.
14
posted on
11/15/2005 3:52:26 PM PST
by
taxesareforever
(Government is running amuck)
To: Valin
Let's take it a step further: Stop taking prisoners.
15
posted on
11/15/2005 3:53:56 PM PST
by
Cyber Liberty
(© 2005, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
To: StarCMC
GRRRRRRRR! What a bunch'a hugh maroons! They will regret that decision...but it'll still be Bush's fault!
16
posted on
11/15/2005 3:56:03 PM PST
by
luvie
(Our will is strong, our nation is united, and we will settle for nothing less than victory. GWB11-11)
To: StarCMC
Hoping for a few of these info nuggets to come to the forefront:
"The alleged terrorist during routine administrative transfer from his cell, started an altercation with the accompanying MPS guarding him. The alleged terrorist struggled with the MP to gain control of th MPs sidearm. In the subsequent struggle, the sidearm accidentaly discharged. The bullet entered the alleged terrorist's forehead and remain lodged in his head. The now deceased alleged terrorist expired due this accidental but fatal injury."
Said in a Chicago Cop accent
17
posted on
11/15/2005 3:57:49 PM PST
by
slapshot
("USAF- when you absolutely, positively need it delivered on target, on time, right away")
To: slapshot
That's right. Shot while trying to escape. Darn. What bad luck. /sarc
18
posted on
11/15/2005 3:58:58 PM PST
by
StarCMC
(Old Sarge is my hero...doing it right in Iraq! Vaya con Dios, Sarge.)
To: Valin
Some of the judges need to be tried as well for aiding and abetting terrorism against the United States of America.
To: NormsRevenge
I saw the K K and knew instantly who appointed her. Thanks for the confirmation. It just didn't look like your average citizen's name, and that usually indicates a lefty.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-152 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson