Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LIVE THREAD - California special election (props 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80)
California Secretary of State- Special Statewide Election ^ | Tuesday evening November 8th

Posted on 11/08/2005 8:20:03 PM PST by ajolympian2004

TODAY, Californians are heading to the polls to vote on several major propositions that shall dramatically affect both the political and economic future of our state.

We are following the activity and will report the results.

California Propositions

2.8% of precincts reporting as of Nov 08 08:13 PM PST

Results: http://www.sfgate.com/election/

(Excerpt) Read more at vote2005.ss.ca.gov ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: 2006doitagain; abortionfelons; arnold; bankruptdems; bankruptunions; biglabor; bleedtheliberals; bogusconservatives; bushsfaultnot; cadoomed; california; californiaislost; crashandburn; dergrubenator; doitagain2006; dontevenbother; electionresults; electionreturns; givelibshell2006; hastalavistababy; ilk; illbeback; joinarnold; kennedywithanr; kickass2006; liberalrinos; mikerosen; oneterminator; partytrumpsperson; pollyannarinos; prop73; prop74; prop75; prop76; prop77; proposition73; proposition74; proposition75; proposition76; proposition77; proposition78; repeatpropositions; rinosscrewedusagain; schwarzeneggar; schwarzenegger; schwarzenrino; screwedbyrinosagain; specialelection; statewidereturns; stopuniontheivery; terminator; unionthugs; wherewasbush; whydidntyouvote
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 1,481-1,489 next last
To: NormsRevenge

this is huge for Arnold. the msm were for the opposite of what's going down.


141 posted on 11/08/2005 8:58:40 PM PST by againstallhope (go bears indeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: ajolympian2004
Ca State Seal C A L I F O R N I A   S E C R E T A R Y   O F   S T A T E
 B R U C E   M c P H E R S O N


Special Statewide Election
November 8, 2005

  Home   Please Read   County Reporting Status   Feedback  
 
State Ballot Measures
12.6% ( 2222 of 17657 ) precincts reporting as of Nov 8, 2005 at 8:56 pm

 Statewide Returns County Returns | County Status 
   Propositions                      Yes Votes   Pct.   No Votes   Pct.
  Y    Minor's Pregnancy            977,488  52.0     903,466  48.0  Map
  Y    Teacher Tenure               970,102  51.1     928,555  48.9  Map
  Y    Public Union Dues          1,040,526  55.1     851,026  44.9  Map
  N    Spending/Funding             826,664  43.6   1,066,462  56.4  Map
  N    Redistricting                875,048  46.6     999,577  53.4  Map
  N    Rx Drug Discounts            808,279  43.2   1,058,659  56.8  Map
  N    Rx Drug Rebates              706,563  38.0   1,150,907  62.0  Map
  N    Electric Regulation          639,234  35.0   1,184,010  65.0  Map
 
spacer
      Y - Proposition is passing
      N - Proposition is not passing
 
County Returns for
All Counties
Alameda
Alpine
Amador
Butte
Calaveras
Colusa
Contra Costa
Del Norte
El Dorado
Fresno
Glenn
Humboldt
Imperial
Inyo
Kern
Kings
Lake
Lassen
Los Angeles
Madera
Marin
Mariposa
Mendocino
Merced
Modoc
Mono
Monterey
Napa
Nevada
Orange
Placer
Plumas
Riverside
Sacramento
San Benito
San Bernardino
San Diego
San Francisco
San Joaquin
San Luis Obispo
San Mateo
Santa Barbara
Santa Clara
Santa Cruz
Shasta
Sierra
Siskiyou
Solano
Sonoma
Stanislaus
Sutter
Tehama
Trinity
Tulare
Tuolumne
Ventura
Yolo
Yuba
 
 
 
California 2005 Special Election
County Reporting Status


















































142 posted on 11/08/2005 8:58:41 PM PST by davidosborne (www.DavidOsborne.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl

And once it passes...oh boy. NOT good for the unions! And THAT is a good thing!


143 posted on 11/08/2005 8:59:04 PM PST by Simmy2.5 (There are more conspiracies at DU then there are on Coast to Coast AM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: GVgirl
San Francisco and the Bay Area will vote against 73, 74 and 75 but it won't make a difference. Californians like a spending cap - when 46% of the public voted for it, politicians need to pay attention. People obviously do want the government to live within its means (Prop. 76 wouldn't really restrain spending so that's why voters rejected it) and the Democrats are in danger of overreaching if they think it means business as usual.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie.Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

144 posted on 11/08/2005 8:59:07 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Chuck54

I'm surprised about Inyo, Kern and SB counties on 77. I thought these more conservative areas would swing Yes. I know it's early though.


145 posted on 11/08/2005 8:59:30 PM PST by WalterSkinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne

Notice some votes came in from SF and knocked down 75 to just over 55%.


146 posted on 11/08/2005 9:00:06 PM PST by Looper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I'm not sure about Prop. 73 and 74. They seem too close that, once San Franfreakshow comes in, these two might fail.

Prop. 75 on the other hand...appears headed to victory! And more power to it!


147 posted on 11/08/2005 9:00:18 PM PST by Simmy2.5 (There are more conspiracies at DU then there are on Coast to Coast AM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: avant_garde
Why would you want an unelected panel deciding the district lines? Seems the conservative position would have only elected officials so that they could be held accountable by voters!

Yes, you should have 1 elected official drawing the lines. But what you should not have is the legislature draw the lines for themselves which is what I think is true in CA.

The legislature draws the lines so that they can always win which means they draw the lines which means they win, etc.

148 posted on 11/08/2005 9:00:28 PM PST by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl

good point, we may need a couple more hours and a bigger chunk to have a better feel for what is going down.


149 posted on 11/08/2005 9:00:47 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB; Brad's Gramma; RonDog

"Still, 2 out of Arnie's 4, plus the parental notification amendment passing...IN California. Take the wins where they come."


HoooYeah. We take back our rights one HUNDRED MILLION DOLLAR UNION EXPENDITURE at a time. Ain't going to be easy. But it's got to be done. Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition.


150 posted on 11/08/2005 9:00:51 PM PST by The Spirit Of Allegiance (SAVE THE BRAINFOREST! Boycott the RED Dead Tree Media & NUKE the DNC Class Action Temper Tantrum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

"Prop. 76 had built-in borrowing. It wasn't a real spending cap and 77 - while voters like the idea of ending gerrymandering, who trusts judges?"

I think you hit the nail on the head, here. I wasn't really happy with the "retired judges redistricting" in 77. Also wasn't too sure about 76, because of the borrowing, but voted for both because of Arnold. If we want him to clean this place up, we have to give him the tools. But not too surprised if 76-77 go down. At least it's a place to start next time.


151 posted on 11/08/2005 9:00:52 PM PST by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: ruthles

I honestly don't think most people in California see 73 as particularly controversial. It is just that anything at all that encroaches on abortion availability is seen as a slippery slope in this state.


152 posted on 11/08/2005 9:01:04 PM PST by dsmtoday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Looper

here's the local sf station.

http://static.viacomlocalnetworks.com/~kpix/leader/racelist.htm

aren't they more current?


153 posted on 11/08/2005 9:01:27 PM PST by againstallhope (go bears indeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Simmy2.5

I would like 73 and 75 to pass of all of them but if only 75 passes, hell , light the stogies. ;-)


154 posted on 11/08/2005 9:02:03 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: JWojack

Only the President and VP have Constitutional requirements for their offices (Article 2, Section 1; and the 12th Amendment, respectively). There are no other constitutional requirements for any other Executive offices (which is why cabinet members are said to serve "at the pleasure of the President.") So technically, no one else in the line of succession needs to have these same requirements. In the event of a catstrophe, should the line come to one who does not meet them, that person would simply be skipped in the line of succession.


155 posted on 11/08/2005 9:02:44 PM PST by TheBigB (<----cooler than the other side of the pillow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch

Wow! That's neat!


156 posted on 11/08/2005 9:02:53 PM PST by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Blurblogger

Yeppers. It MUST be done!


157 posted on 11/08/2005 9:02:59 PM PST by Brad’s Gramma (FR1....Varoooooom, Varooooooom!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: Simmy2.5
They will pass. They're leading in Los Angeles County. Hey we take what we can get. All year Arnold has been pulverized by the unions and the Democrats and he's still standing. He'll look stronger after tomorrow. The spending cap issue will be back again as well as redistricting. Those issues are not going to go away any time soon.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie.Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

158 posted on 11/08/2005 9:03:18 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl

Am I reading these stats right?

9.2% turnout in San Fransisco?

9.1% in LA?

If those are right then 73,74, and 75 are all going to pass. Perhaps even 77.


159 posted on 11/08/2005 9:03:21 PM PST by furquhart (Cheney-Bush '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

160 posted on 11/08/2005 9:03:21 PM PST by keat (Posting code without previewing since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 1,481-1,489 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson