Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Approves Cuts to Social Programs (Cutting $36B in Spending!)
Fox News ^ | November 03, 2005 | AP

Posted on 11/03/2005 3:32:35 PM PST by HHKrepublican_2

WASHINGTON — The Senate on Thursday narrowly approved the first cuts since 1997 to benefit programs such as Medicare (search), Medicaid (search) and farm subsidies, giving Republicans a symbolic victory against ever-rising government spending.

The bill, passed by a 52-47 vote, would make modest cuts to the health care programs for the elderly, poor and disabled, but leave the food stamp program untouched.

The measure also would permit exploratory oil drilling in an Alaskan wilderness (search) area.

The spending battle now heads to the House, where Republicans are divided over whether to cut more deeply across a broader range of social programs.

The spending battle now heads to the House, where Republicans are divided over whether to cut more deeply across a broader range of social programs

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; awayfromthetrough; bouttime; federalspending; fiscalrestraint; pork; twofrontwar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 221-240 next last
To: HHKrepublican_2

It's $36 Billion over 5 years so whoppee freakin' do


61 posted on 11/03/2005 3:52:37 PM PST by qam1 (There's been a huge party. All plates and the bottles are empty, all that's left is the bill to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Onelifetogive

"This is fine, so long as we don't cut that bridge to NOWHERE in Alaska..."

Good point. I mean, that bridge to nowhere is a lot more important than the elderly and disabled.


62 posted on 11/03/2005 3:54:32 PM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March ("Every time the court veers left, the people are overwhelmingly opposed." [Laura Ingraham])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sofa King
You all missed the fact that they put an increase of the H1b visas in there. It will increase the number of legal residents by one third, more than 300k. They could care less about the American working man at all. The only any of them care about is corporate bottom lines.
63 posted on 11/03/2005 3:55:05 PM PST by calvo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: scottdeus12

Collins, Snowe, Dewine and Chafee. Landrieu voted yea (but she's coming back for the money).


64 posted on 11/03/2005 3:57:11 PM PST by byteback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: King Prout
If baseline budgeting is still in effect...

I actually thought that the Republican Congress had eliminated that noxious practice after the 104th Congress, but I suppose not.

65 posted on 11/03/2005 3:57:43 PM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: calvo

Better than having them come here illegally over the border than the refuse to do anything about.


66 posted on 11/03/2005 3:58:30 PM PST by Sofa King (A wise man uses compromise as an alternative to defeat. A fool uses it as an alternative to victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: HHKrepublican_2

Is this a cut in the DC sense of the word (reduction in increase) or an actual cut (less than last year)?


67 posted on 11/03/2005 3:59:06 PM PST by FMBass (“Now that I’m sober I watch a lot of news” – Garofalo: From “Treason” by Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: byteback
Also Colman Nay and Ben Nelson yea. What's up with Coleman?

Senate roll call

68 posted on 11/03/2005 3:59:08 PM PST by byteback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: byteback

Thanks, hey where'd you get that info? I'd like to see how everyone voted....


69 posted on 11/03/2005 3:59:21 PM PST by scottdeus12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: TeenagedConservative
It was a sarcastic statement... after signing so many pork-laden spending bills up to this point. It's about time congress got down to being "Conservative" and Bush quit proposing new projects that we cant afford.
70 posted on 11/03/2005 4:00:49 PM PST by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: HHKrepublican_2

I won't believe this until I see the dollar figure of what was spent on these programs last year and the dollar figure that is budgeted to be spent this year. $36B less? I want to do the math myself, thank you.


71 posted on 11/03/2005 4:03:07 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HHKrepublican_2

Why don't they start by cutting out hundreds of unnecessary government programs and let the elite bureaucrats take it in the neck rather than people who've been paying taxes all their lives? Or cut back welfare and let ablebodied people work to eat, not sit back and wait for the next check? I've heard college students talk about how they can live off the gov.. No doubt their extreme left wing profs taught them well.


72 posted on 11/03/2005 4:03:14 PM PST by Paperdoll (On the cutting edge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

Can't. I seem to be dreaming with you...


73 posted on 11/03/2005 4:03:20 PM PST by Irish Rose (Will work for chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph
Only in Washington is a reduction in the amount of increased spending considered to be a cut

Deserves repeating...!!

74 posted on 11/03/2005 4:04:25 PM PST by Osage Orange (Hillary's heart is blacker than the devil's riding boots......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

"Only in Washington is a reduction in the amount of increased spending considered to be a cut."


Bears repeating.


75 posted on 11/03/2005 4:05:19 PM PST by taxed2death (A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Deetes

I have no clue, but at least this is a step forward.


76 posted on 11/03/2005 4:07:08 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph
Only in Washington is a reduction in the amount of increased spending considered to be a cut.

It's a bone, tossed out for the hungry among us.

77 posted on 11/03/2005 4:07:26 PM PST by Black Tooth (The more people I meet, the more I like my dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HHKrepublican_2

36 billion in social spending cuts!!! Those heartless knuckledragging homophobic/sexist/racist/bigotted/misogynist fascists would throw their own grandmothers out into the street and starve all school-aged children whose families are too busy spending their hard-earned welfare checks on cigarettes, crack and other necessities of life. Of course progressyve Democrats are never racists even when we say racist things because we aren't racist by definition. We also demonstrate our love for our families as we work to get cradle to grave government support for all our extended families through a redistributive tax structure.
I mean, AlGore hit the nail on the head when he asked who was going to take care of his mother's needs back in the stolen 2000 election. Sure the guy was worth something short of a million bucks, but what the hey, shouldn't we share in the blessings of supporting his mother through our taxes? Surely government can't expect progressyves to bear the brunt of providing for our aged and increasingly non-productive parents can it?
Like I've always said: In the interest of a beautiful world without suffering, hug an old-growth tree and euthanize grandma.


78 posted on 11/03/2005 4:09:09 PM PST by rockthecasbah (Today is the greatest day I've ever known. Can't wait for tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thinkin' Gal

Yea. The ones where they talk for three hours and vote to honor the Super Bowl champions or some philanthropy.


79 posted on 11/03/2005 4:10:55 PM PST by Veritas et equitas ad Votum (If the Constitution "lives and breathes", it dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

Maybe Reid's little temper tantrum the other day showed them once and for all they can't get along with these guys so now they're just doing whatever they feel like.


80 posted on 11/03/2005 4:12:14 PM PST by festus (The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 221-240 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson