Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SUSAN ESTRICH RESPONDS TO JUANITA BROADDRICK'S OFFER TO SPEAK ABOUT HER RAPE -- "not interested"
email from Susan Estrich | 10-21-05 | Doug from Upland

Posted on 10/21/2005 2:18:09 PM PDT by doug from upland

At 11:37 am this morning, I received an email from USC professor of law, Susan Estrich.

After hearing Estrich discuss her new Hillary book with Sean Hannity on October 11, I was a little upset. Estrich was essentially calling our friend Juanita Broaddrick a liar. She had spoken with her friend Bill Clinton, and, of course, Bill denied that he raped Juanita. That was good enough for Estrich. Bill could lie to his wife, lie to his daughter, lie to his attorney, lie to his secretary, lie to reporters, lie to his cabinet, lie to the court, and lie to the American people while pointing his finger at us, but by some cosmic mystery that is beyond human comprehension, Bill would not lie to her. Okay then. So, Juanita was not telling the truth. She is a liar. Unfortunately, this teacher of law students, this officer of the court, this person who purports to be so fair and open-minded, had not heard the other side of the story. She has never spoken with Juanita. Yet, Juanita is a liar. A known liar and perjurer told her so. Well, something needed to be done about that.

PREVIOUS STORY

An initial conversation was held with Ms. Estrich's secretary at USC inquiring about the willingness of Estrich to speak with Juanita if it could be arranged. That was followed up with an email.

Juanita then contacted me through FReepmail with the good news -- she wanted to meet with Susan. She had some things she wanted to tell her. Certainly, Estrich, as a fellow rape survivor, would be interested in speaking with Juanita, right?

Another phone call and email to Estrich's office gave her the good news. Apparently, it was not very good news to Estrich. Here is the email received from her this morning ---



What? She is not interested? A fellow rape survivor wants to speak with her after comments were made on a radio show and Estrich is not interested?

If she were honest, rather than merely being a Bill Clinton sick-o-fant, here is the email she should have sent to me ---

If anyone is interested in taking some action, I would appreciate your help. Until Estrich speaks with Juanita and hears her story, why would any talk show host on our side have the sick-o-fant on the air to sell her book? If you participate on blogs, please spread the word.

We all know why Estrich won't meet with her. She is afraid to hear the truth. If she heard the truth, it would be an incredible moral dilemma. How does a rape survivor side with a rapist against a fellow rape survivor and dare show herself on television ever again?

Just imagine her course of action had the rapist been named Newt Gingrich, Tom DeLay, Dick Cheney, Karl Rove, or George W. Bush.

Susan, I once had some respect for you when you and I had good discussions on your Los Angeles weekend radio show. Now, the sight of you and the sound of your voice simply make me ill. You are a phony.

SUSAN ESTRICH CONTACT INFORMATION

Susan Estrich
Robert Kingsley Professor in Law and Professor of Law and Political Science

Phone: (213) 740-7578
E-mail address: sestrich@law.usc.edu


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: broaddrick; clinton; estrich; estrichtherapist; hillary; juanita; rape; sexualpredator; syphiliticdementia; uglierthansin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-227 next last
To: A CA Guy
Thanks, but the main point being a stranger coming up to discuss what they shouldn't know regarding a mysterious disappearance of the family pet is a concern.

Indeed, I do agree with you completely. That invasion of one's personal space and the threat implied must have had a long term chilling effect.

201 posted on 10/26/2005 11:56:38 PM PDT by caryatid (All good things which exist are the fruits of originality. [John Stuart Mill])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: caryatid; doug from upland
Has Louis Freeh given any account of those 900 or so FBI files? I know he is making the rounds but I haven't seen anything on the files. Would love to hear about how THAT happened and why it apparently has never been corrected and prosecuted.
202 posted on 10/27/2005 8:56:54 AM PDT by hummingbird (Think I'll google for a while.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: hummingbird

I haven't read his book yet.


203 posted on 10/27/2005 9:30:14 AM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Go DFU Go! Keep the heat on! Estrich is showing her true spineless colors.


204 posted on 10/27/2005 9:32:27 AM PDT by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYpeanut; All
NYpeanut has graciously volunteered to start a Juanita ping list (or does someone already have that?). If you want on, FReepmail NYpeanut or do a ping on a thread and ask to NYpeanut be on it.

Juanita and Kathleen are taking it to Bill and Hillary, and I suspect we will be hearing more.

205 posted on 10/27/2005 9:33:42 AM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
click
206 posted on 10/27/2005 9:35:09 AM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Must have been a blind man that raped Susan Ostrich. Or maybe it was really dark.

Sorry, couldn't resist.


207 posted on 10/27/2005 9:37:04 AM PDT by subterfuge (Obama, mo mama...er Osama-La bamba, uh, bama...banana rama...URP!---Ted Kennedy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Even a twerp like Christopher Shays said he believed that, after viewing the evidence, Clinton raped JB twice. Of course, the schmuck didn't find this impeachable.


208 posted on 10/27/2005 9:38:42 AM PDT by Inwoodian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirJohnBarleycorn

Well said.

I predict that someday, when the former philanderer in Chief has died of AIDS or some other STD, and Hitlary has been fettered off to the Socialist's Old Folks home, that many many women who were previously afraid of Arkancide will come foward with stories of brutal rape by Slick Willie.


209 posted on 10/27/2005 9:41:56 AM PDT by subterfuge (Obama, mo mama...er Osama-La bamba, uh, bama...banana rama...URP!---Ted Kennedy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: subterfuge

Come on. That doesn't help. Rape, of course, has a sexual element, but it really is about control and violence.


210 posted on 10/27/2005 9:44:01 AM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

The problem with Susan Estrich is that she has little if any respect for the truth. She doesn't care whether Juanita Broderick got raped or whether Bill Clinton is lying about anything.

The first priority of every chick is simple: Chicks want MORE, more stuff, more money, more power, more freedom, more fun, more, more, more . . . That is what being a chick is all about. It has nothing to do with morals and truthtelling. Chicks just want MORE.

Bill Clinton got elected by promising chicks MORE and getting their votes. He got re-elected by using the presidency to give chicks MORE. Bill Clinton was "Big Daddy" for every female voter. That explains his presidency.

That is why Susan Estrich supports Clinton. It has nothing to do with truthtelling. She cares nothing about truth and the facts of what happened to some other girl. She herself is a chick and Clinton gave chicks MORE in order to get their votes.

DA740


211 posted on 10/27/2005 9:55:00 AM PDT by DA740
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DA740
I think some lady FReepers may have a problem with your post. Chicks? I think you may have had some issues. :)

Actually, for Susan, it is about political agenda.

212 posted on 10/27/2005 10:10:46 AM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: caryatid

Kathleen is still scared about being out in the public with this. She is that much more concerned for the rest of the country should Hillary get elected.

Lots of dead people around the Clintons, so it is an issue of concern.


213 posted on 10/27/2005 10:50:15 AM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Why are men supposed to shy away from the truth because otherwise chicks might get mad?

That's my whole point about what has gone wrong within the male mind. Truth is our business, men's business, and truth should not be ignored and buried because chicks might get mad at it.

DA740


214 posted on 10/27/2005 11:04:56 AM PDT by DA740
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
I haven't read his book yet.

Same here...man o' man...Susan Estrich was awful on b o'R last night. She should have told O'R "not interested" in being on his show. She looked so peculiar and came across as a giddy ghostwriter. If that is how she teaches her classes, students probably lose credit taking any of her classes.
215 posted on 10/27/2005 12:33:34 PM PDT by hummingbird (Think I'll google for a while.....on FRED THOMPSON for a seat on the SUPREME COURT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: DA740
This 'chick' doesn't want 'more and more,' she wants less and less of inane stereotyping and attempts to divide freepers. Bash liberals all you want here, but try to keep in mind that a large percent of freepers are female and don't appreciate hearing that we are all the same. There's a world of difference between me and a liberal woman.

Likewise, I hope that you and bill clinton aren't the same just because you are the same gender. Because he wanted more and more. More flesh to bruise, more women to rape.

216 posted on 10/27/2005 3:26:02 PM PDT by NYpeanut (gulping for air, I started crying and yelling at him, "Why did you lie to me?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: DA740
"Here a chick, there a chick, everywhere a chick, chick, Ole Big Daddy chased them all, EE-I-EE-I-O".

Don't put all your (chicken) eggs in one basket. You're Big Daddy was no better than chicken feed to me. OF COURSE I didn't vote for the likes of him to be president! He was unfit for that distinquished office before the-masses-are-the-asses stupidly voted for him. His real character (or, more to point, lack of it) after he got elected was on display for all the world to see.

And what does that say about his ambitious, shameless wife that she did not kick him the hell out of her life?

Oh no! Not them in the White House again! Conservatives have to pull out all the stops...the Clinton connivers must be exposed without mercy or timidity. If Hil is given the soft-glove treatment, conservatives with a voice can blame themselves.

I'm not a "chick", thank you very much.

217 posted on 10/27/2005 10:04:35 PM PDT by IIntense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: NYpeanut

I would tend to think you view men just as homogeneously as I view females. Right? (C'mon, admit it.)

I'm not as bad as you think, either. Do you really expect a man not to try very hard to find the truth? (I am a man, after all.)

DA740


218 posted on 10/28/2005 1:36:03 PM PDT by DA740
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: DA740
I would tend to think you view men just as homogeneously as I view females. Right? (C'mon, admit it.)

Absolutely not, so I can't admit it. My ex is a lying, cheating, lazy drunk and I despise everyone like him, male or female. My significant other and the rest of my friends are smart, honest and delightful, male and female.

I don't think you're bad, just the victim of your experiences. You can recover, no big deal.

219 posted on 10/28/2005 2:18:17 PM PDT by NYpeanut (gulping for air, I started crying and yelling at him, "Why did you lie to me?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: NYpeanut
"My ex is a lying, cheating, lazy drunk..."

Too many "once-married" women and men have similar experiences and I know some of them. Do these people do a 180 after they walk down the aisle or does the other party to the marriage choose to ignore the tell-tale signs?

At times I've wondered if some marriages were a mistake in the first place. I recall my Mother's words to me: "There are a million reasons why people marry" (the one they marry, she obviously meant.)

220 posted on 10/28/2005 10:14:30 PM PDT by IIntense (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-227 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson