Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: doug from upland

The problem with Susan Estrich is that she has little if any respect for the truth. She doesn't care whether Juanita Broderick got raped or whether Bill Clinton is lying about anything.

The first priority of every chick is simple: Chicks want MORE, more stuff, more money, more power, more freedom, more fun, more, more, more . . . That is what being a chick is all about. It has nothing to do with morals and truthtelling. Chicks just want MORE.

Bill Clinton got elected by promising chicks MORE and getting their votes. He got re-elected by using the presidency to give chicks MORE. Bill Clinton was "Big Daddy" for every female voter. That explains his presidency.

That is why Susan Estrich supports Clinton. It has nothing to do with truthtelling. She cares nothing about truth and the facts of what happened to some other girl. She herself is a chick and Clinton gave chicks MORE in order to get their votes.

DA740


211 posted on 10/27/2005 9:55:00 AM PDT by DA740
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DA740
I think some lady FReepers may have a problem with your post. Chicks? I think you may have had some issues. :)

Actually, for Susan, it is about political agenda.

212 posted on 10/27/2005 10:10:46 AM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies ]

To: DA740
This 'chick' doesn't want 'more and more,' she wants less and less of inane stereotyping and attempts to divide freepers. Bash liberals all you want here, but try to keep in mind that a large percent of freepers are female and don't appreciate hearing that we are all the same. There's a world of difference between me and a liberal woman.

Likewise, I hope that you and bill clinton aren't the same just because you are the same gender. Because he wanted more and more. More flesh to bruise, more women to rape.

216 posted on 10/27/2005 3:26:02 PM PDT by NYpeanut (gulping for air, I started crying and yelling at him, "Why did you lie to me?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies ]

To: DA740
"Here a chick, there a chick, everywhere a chick, chick, Ole Big Daddy chased them all, EE-I-EE-I-O".

Don't put all your (chicken) eggs in one basket. You're Big Daddy was no better than chicken feed to me. OF COURSE I didn't vote for the likes of him to be president! He was unfit for that distinquished office before the-masses-are-the-asses stupidly voted for him. His real character (or, more to point, lack of it) after he got elected was on display for all the world to see.

And what does that say about his ambitious, shameless wife that she did not kick him the hell out of her life?

Oh no! Not them in the White House again! Conservatives have to pull out all the stops...the Clinton connivers must be exposed without mercy or timidity. If Hil is given the soft-glove treatment, conservatives with a voice can blame themselves.

I'm not a "chick", thank you very much.

217 posted on 10/27/2005 10:04:35 PM PDT by IIntense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson